Learning with Social Media: How do Preservice Teachers Integrate YouTube and Social Media in Teaching?

Alayyar, G. M., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: Support from blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1298–1316.

Alvermann, D. E. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 8–19.

Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234–249.

Bassey, M. (1990). On the nature of research in education (part 2). Research Intelligence, 37(Summer), 39–44.

Beckman, K., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2014). Understanding students’ use and value of technology for learning. Learning, Media and Technology. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.878353 .

Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can YouTube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 269–285.

Bonk, C. J. (2008). YouTube anchors and enders: The use of shared online video content as a macro context for learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association 2008 Annual Meeting.

Bush, T. (2002). Authenticity - reliability, validity and triangulation. In M. Coleman & A. Briggs (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (pp. 58–72). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Callahan, M., & King, J. M. (2011). Classroom remix: Patterns of pedagogy in a techno-literacies poetry unit. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 134–144.

Carter, G. V., & Arroyo, S. J. (2011). Tubing the future: Participatory pedagogy and YouTube U in 2020. Computers and Composition, 28(4), 292–302.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating Preservice Teachers’ Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill.

Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.

Eagleton, M. B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the Web: strategies for Internet inquiry. New York: Guilford Press.

Enochsson, A. B., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in Initial Teacher Training: Research Review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 38, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220502872611 .

Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE.

Gao, P., Tan, S. C., Wang, L. L., Wong, A. F. L., & Choy, D. (2011). Self reflection and preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge: Promoting earlier adoption of student-centric pedagogies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology., 27(6), 997–1013.

Garcia, A., & Morrell, E. (2013). City youth and the pedagogy of participatory media, learning. Media and Technology, 38(2), 123–127.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Gourlay, L., Hamilton, M., & Lea, M. R. (2013). Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–13.

Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28, 530–546.

Guzman, A., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25, 453–469.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21 century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation.

Jones, C. (2010). A new generation of learners? The net generation and digital natives. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(4), 365–368.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F. W. (2012). Leveraging the affordances of YouTube: The role of pedagogical knowledge and mental models of technology functions for lesson planning with technology. Computers & Education, 58, 1194–1206.

Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies (3ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208.

Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.

Leu, D. J., Jr, Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570–1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenages’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New media Society, 10(3), 393–411.

McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306.

Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367.

Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0, wikis, and social networking. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63, 8–13. December 2005/January 2006.

Salomon, G. (1964). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658.

Shin, D. -H. (2013). Defining sociability and social presence in Social TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 939–947.

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The scocial psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2013). Exploring Chinese pre-service teachers’ integrations of YouTube in teaching. Paper presented at the 2013 American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, U.S.A.

Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2014a). Exploring the usage of ICT and YouTube for teaching: a study of preservice teachers in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 53–59.

 Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2014b). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: what effects are there on students′ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.881391.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.