Learner characteristics and information processing in multimedia learning: A moderated mediation of the seductive details effect

Canham, 2010, Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics, Learning and Instruction, 20, 155, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014 Choi, 2014, Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load, Educational Psychology Review, 26, 225, 10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6 Ekstrom, 1976 Garner, 1991, Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A microanalysis, The Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 310, 10.1080/00220973.1991.10806569 Garner, 1992, "Seductive details" and learning from text, 239 Garner, 1989, Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children, Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41, 10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2 Goetz, 1995, ‘Commentary: The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions?’: Reply, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 518, 10.2307/747630 Gyselinck, 2000, Visuospatial working memory in learning from multimedia systems, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 166, 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00128.x Haider, 1999, Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information-reduction hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 172 Harp, 2005, The consequences of including seductive details during lecture, Teaching of Psychology, 32, 100, 10.1207/s15328023top3202_4 Harp, 1998, How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414, 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414 Hayes, 2013 Hidi, 1988, Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts, Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465, 10.2307/747644 Holsanova, 2009, Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1215, 10.1002/acp.1525 Jarodzka, 2010, In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli, Learning and Instruction, 20, 146, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019 Just, 1976, Eye fixations and cognitive processes, Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441, 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3 Kalyuga, 2011, Cognitiv load theory: How many types of load does it really need?, Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1, 10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7 Kalyuga, 2003, The expertise reversal effect, Educational Psychologist, 38, 23, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4 Kalyuga, 1998, Levels of expertise and instructional design, Human Factors, 40, 1, 10.1518/001872098779480587 Knörzer, 2016, Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning, Learning and Instruction, 44, 97, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.002 Koch, 2008, One more expertise reversal effect in an instructional design to foster coherence formation, 207 Lehman, 2007, Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002 Leppink, 2014, Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load, Learning and Instruction, 30, 32, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001 Magner, 2014, Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments, Learning and Instruction, 29, 141, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002 Mayer, 2001 Mayer, 2010, Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics, Learning and Instruction, 20, 167, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.012 Mayer, 1994, For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389, 10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389 Mayer, 1996, When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64, 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64 Mayer, 2008, Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329 McCrudden, 2010, Verbal ability and the processing of scientific text with seductive detail sentences, Reading Psychology, 31, 282, 10.1080/02702710903256486 McInerney, 1991, Cross cultural model testing: Inventory of school motivation, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 123, 10.1177/0013164491511011 McNamara, 1996, Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text, Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1, 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 Moreno, 2010, Cognitive load theory: Historical development and relation to other theories, 9 Münzer, 2009, Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities, Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 481, 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.001 Oberauer, 2000, Working memory capacity – Facets of a cognitive ability construct, Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017, 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2 Paas, 1992, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 Paas, 2003, Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments, Educational Psychologist, 38, 1, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 Park, 2015, The rhythm method: A new method for measuring cognitive load – An experimental dual-task study, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 232, 10.1002/acp.3100 Park, 2015, Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061 Park, 2015, Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms, Computers & Education, 86, 30, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.016 Park, 2015, Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect? A cognitive-load-study using eye-tracking, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 24 Park, 2011, Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006 Park, B., Münzer, S., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (accepted). The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning: An ATI-study. Computers in Human Behavior. Park, 2014, Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning, Learning and Instruction, 29, 125, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005 Plass, 2014, Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning, Learning and Instruction, 29, 128, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006 2010 Rayner, 1998, Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20years of research, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372, 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 Rayner, 2007, Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects, Vision Research, 47, 2714, 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007 Reichle, 2003, The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445, 10.1017/S0140525X03000104 Rey, 2012, A review of research and meta-analysis of the seductive details effect, Educational Research Review, 7, 216, 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003 Rey, 2014, Seductive details and attention distraction - an eye tracker experiment, Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 133, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.017 Sanchez, 2006, An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity, Memory & Cognition, 34, 344, 10.3758/BF03193412 Schmidt-Weigand, 2010, A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 100, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011 Schraw, 1998, Processing and recall differences among seductive details, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3, 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.3 Sweller, 2011 Um, 2012, Emotional design in multimedia learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485, 10.1037/a0026609