Lãnh đạo và niềm tin thúc đẩy sự thành công của các nhóm chức năng chéo
Tóm tắt
Các nhóm chức năng chéo (CFTs) đã gia tăng sự phổ biến trong nhiều tổ chức khác nhau. Trong khi những nhóm này tuyên bố rằng chúng nâng cao hiệu quả tổ chức, nghiên cứu đã cho thấy kết quả không nhất quán. Bài báo này xem xét những thách thức mà các CFTs phải đối mặt và lý do tại sao những thách thức này làm phát sinh nhu cầu phát triển một khí hậu đội nhóm cho niềm tin. Niềm tin được bàn thảo như một cấu trúc cấp độ đội nhóm, một khía cạnh của "khí hậu vi mô" xảy ra trong một đội. Các hành động lãnh đạo đặc biệt quan trọng đối với các nhóm chức năng chéo và sự phát triển của niềm tin được coi là có ảnh hưởng trong việc tạo ra một khí hậu đội nhóm cho niềm tin trong các nhóm chức năng chéo.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 634‐65.
Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997), “What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, pp. 239‐90.
Denison, D.R., Hart, S.L. and Kahn, J.A. (1996), ‘‘From chimneys to cross‐functional teams: developing and validating a diagnostic model”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 1005‐23.
Eigel, K.M. and Kehnert, K.W. (1996, “Personality diversity and its relationship to managerial team productivity”, in Ruderman, M.N., Hughes‐James, M.W. and Jackson, S.E. (Eds), Selected Research on Work Team Diversity, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Ford, R.C. and Randolph, W.A. (1992), “Cross‐functional structures: a review and integration of matrix organization and project management”, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, pp. 267‐94.
Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1996), “Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13, pp. 191‐215.
Gruenfeld, D.H., Mannix, E.A., Williams, K.Y. and Neale, M.A. (1996), “Group composition and decision making: how member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67, pp. 1‐15.
Guzzo, R.A. and Salas, E. (1995), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Hackman, J.R. (1987), “The design of work teams”, in Lorsch, J.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 315‐42.
Hackman, J.R. and Morris, C.G. (1975), “Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, NY.
Hackman, J.R. and Walton, R.E. (1986), “Leading groups in organizations”, in Goodman, P.S. and associates (Eds), Designing Effective Work Groups, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 72‐119.
Harvard Business Review (1994), “Cross‐functional teams: are they always the right move?”, Harvard Business Review, November/December.
Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (1996), Diversity in Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Jackson, S.E., May, K.E. and Whitney, K. (1995), “Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams’’, in Guzzo, R.A. and Salas, E. (Eds), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Janz, B.D., Colquitt, J.A. and Noe, R.A. (1997), “Knowledge worker team effectiveness: the role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 877‐904.
Jassawalla, A.R. and Sashittal, H.C. (2000), “Strategies of effective new product team leaders”, California Management Review, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 34‐51.
Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. (1997), “The discipline of teams”, in Katz, R. (Ed.), The Human Side of Managing Technology Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
McAllister, D.J. (1995), “Affect‐ and cognitive‐based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 24‐59.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995), “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 709‐34.
Mayerson, D., Weick, K.E. and Kramer, R.M. (1996), “Swift trust and temporary groups”, in Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R. (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 166‐95.
Northcraft, G.B.., Polzer, J.T., Neal, M.A. and Kramer, R.M. (1995), “Diversity, social identity, and performance: emergent social dynamics in cross‐functional teams”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity in Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 17‐46.
Parker, G.M. (1994), “Cross‐functional collaboration”, Training and Development, October, pp. 49‐52.
Pinto, M.B. and Pinto, J.K. (1990), “Project team communication and cross‐functional cooperation in new program development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, pp. 200‐12.
Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. and Camerer, C. (1998), “Not so different after all: a cross‐discipline view of trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 393‐404.
Sethi, R. (2000a), “New product quality and product development teams”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, pp. 1‐14.
Sethi, R. (2000b), “Superordinate identity in cross‐functional product development teams: its antecedents and effect on new product performance”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 330‐44.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.E. and Sherif, C.W. (1961), Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robber’s Cave Experiment, University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman, OK.
Sitkin, S.B. and Roth, N.L. (1993), “Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust”, Organization Science, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 367‐92.
Smith, K.G., Smith, K.A., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., O’Bannon, D.P. and Scully, J.A. (1994), “Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, pp. 412‐38.
Song, X.M., Montoya‐Weiss, M.M. and Schmidt, J.B. (1997), “Antecedents and consequences of cross‐functional cooperation: a comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, pp. 35‐47.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P. and Futrell, D. (1990), “Work teams: applications and effectiveness”, American Psychologist, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 120‐33.
Triandis, H.C. (1995), “The importance of contexts in studies of diversity”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity in Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 17‐46.
Triandis, H.C., Hall, E.R. and Ewen, R.B. (1965), “Member heterogeneity and dyadic creativity’’, Human Relations, Vol. 18, pp. 33‐55.
Tuckman, B.W. (1965), “Developmental sequence in small groups”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 63, pp. 354‐99.
Watson, W.E., Kumar, K. and Michaelsen, L.K. (1993), “Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 3 pp. 590‐602.
Webber, S.S. and Dohanue, L.M. (2001), “Impact of highly and less job‐related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta‐analysis”, Journal of Management, in press.
Wiersema, M.F. and Bantel, K.A. (1992), “Top management team demography and corporate strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 91‐121.
Yukl, G. (1994), Leadership in Organizations, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.