Le suivi échographique de la deuxième partie du travail

Fitzpatrick, 2001, Influence of persistent occiput posterior on delivery outcome, Obstet Gynecol, 98, 1027, 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01600-3

Farabeuf, 1923

Cunningham, 1997, Conduct of normal labor and delivery, 1

Akmal, 2003, Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 21, 437, 10.1002/uog.103

Sherer, 2002, Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 19, 258, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x

Sherer, 2002, Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 19, 264, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x

Akmal, 2002, Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 12, 172, 10.1080/jmf.12.3.172.177

Souka, 2003, Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 13, 59, 10.1080/jmf.13.1.59.63

Dupuis, 2005, Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 123, 193, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009

Rozenberg, 2008, Comparison of the Learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, 332, 10.1002/uog.5267

Kreiser, 2001, Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor, J Matern Fetal Med, 10, 283, 10.1080/jmf.10.4.283.286

Dupuis, 2005, Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, 868, 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.028

Akmal, 2004, Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal occipital position: interobserver agreement, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 24, 421, 10.1002/uog.1065

Bouhanna, 2009, L’échographie en salle de naissance, 253

Van Ham, 1997, Maternal conséquences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and post-operative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 74, 1, 10.1016/S0301-2115(97)02725-5

Towner, 1999, Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury, N Engl J Med, 341, 1709, 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301

Dietz, 2005, Measuring engagement of fetal head: validity and reproductibility of a new ultrasound technique, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 25, 165, 10.1002/uog.1765

Eggebo, 2006, Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 27, 387, 10.1002/uog.2744

Torkildsen, 2011, Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, 702, 10.1002/uog.8951

Maticot-Baptista, 2009, Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 38, 474, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.04.001

Barbera, 2003, Assessment of fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound

Barbera, 2009, A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 313, 10.1002/uog.6329

Barbera, 2009, Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 320, 10.1002/uog.6322

Kalache, 2009, Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the “angle of progression” predict the mode of delivery?, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 326, 10.1002/uog.6294

Bamberg, 2011, Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, 712, 10.1002/uog.8944

Paltieli, 2009, A question of angle of view, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 34, 363, 10.1002/uog.6435

Dückelmann, 2010, Measurement of fetal head descent using the “angle of progression” on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 35, 216, 10.1002/uog.7521

Henrich, 2006, Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 28, 753, 10.1002/uog.3848

Ghi, 2009, Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 331, 10.1002/uog.6313

Fuchs, 2008, Visualization of fetal fontanels and skull sutures by three-dimensional translabial ultrasound during the second stage of labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, 484, 10.1002/uog.5309

Ghi, 2012, Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 39, 238, 10.1002/uog.9034

Ghi, 2010, Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 36, 500, 10.1002/uog.7752

Ghi, 2009, The benefits of sonography-based volume computer aided displaylabor (SonoVCADlabor) during second stage labor, GE Healthcare