Landscape‐scale accessibility of livestock to tigers: implications of spatial grain for modeling predation risk to mitigate human–carnivore conflict

Ecology and Evolution - Tập 5 Số 6 - Trang 1354-1367 - 2015
Jennifer R. B. Miller1,2, Yadvendradev V. Jhala2, Jyotirmay Jena3, Oswald J. Schmitz1
1School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Yale University New Haven Connecticut 06511
2Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India
3Satpuda Maikal Landscape Programme WWF-India Mandla Madhya Pradesh 481661 India

Tóm tắt

AbstractInnovative conservation tools are greatly needed to reduce livelihood losses and wildlife declines resulting from human–carnivore conflict. Spatial risk modeling is an emerging method for assessing the spatial patterns of predator–prey interactions, with applications for mitigating carnivore attacks on livestock. Large carnivores that ambush prey attack and kill over small areas, requiring models at fine spatial grains to predict livestock depredation hot spots. To detect the best resolution for predicting where carnivores access livestock, we examined the spatial attributes associated with livestock killed by tigers in Kanha Tiger Reserve, India, using risk models generated at 20, 100, and 200‐m spatial grains. We analyzed land‐use, human presence, and vegetation structure variables at 138 kill sites and 439 random sites to identify key landscape attributes where livestock were vulnerable to tigers. Land‐use and human presence variables contributed strongly to predation risk models, with most variables showing high relative importance (≥0.85) at all spatial grains. The risk of a tiger killing livestock increased near dense forests and near the boundary of the park core zone where human presence is restricted. Risk was nonlinearly related to human infrastructure and open vegetation, with the greatest risk occurring 1.2 km from roads, 1.1 km from villages, and 8.0 km from scrubland. Kill sites were characterized by denser, patchier, and more complex vegetation with lower visibility than random sites. Risk maps revealed high‐risk hot spots inside of the core zone boundary and in several patches in the human‐dominated buffer zone. Validation against known kills revealed predictive accuracy for only the 20 m model, the resolution best representing the kill stage of hunting for large carnivores that ambush prey, like the tiger. Results demonstrate that risk models developed at fine spatial grains can offer accurate guidance on landscape attributes livestock should avoid to minimize human–carnivore conflict.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2193/2008-325

10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.014

10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002

10.2307/1383287

Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: practical information‐theoretic approach

10.1073/pnas.1210490109

10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.01.008

10.1641/B570608

Draper N., 1993, Applied regression analysis

Edgington E. S., 1995, Randomization tests

10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.016

10.1017/S0376892997000088

Forest Survey of India, 2009, India state of forest report 2009

10.1109/T-C.1975.224110

10.2193/2006-288

10.1890/12-1615.1

10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00189.x

Harihar A. A. J.Kurien B.Pandav andS. P.Goyal.2007.Response of tiger population to habitat wild ungulate prey and human disturbance in Rajaji National Park Uttarakhand India Wildlife Institute of India.Dehradun.

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13858.x

10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.027

10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[201:UOOEAF]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00955.x

10.1017/S003060530899030X

Jhala Y. V., 2009, Monitoring tigers, co‐predators, prey and their habitats

Jhala Y. V. Q.Qureshi J.Vettakevan J.Bohra B.Yumnam U.Kumar et al.2014.Spatial and population ecology of tiger co‐predator and their prey in Kanha tiger reserve. Progress report 2005–2013.Wildlife Institute of India National Tiger Conservation Authority and Kanha Tiger Reserve Dehradun Delhi and Mandla.

10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[347:RSFBOU]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/s10531-009-9657-8

Kanha Tiger Reserve Forest Department, 2012, Tiger conservation plan for Kanha tiger reserve (2012–2022)

10.2307/5647

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01076.x

10.1073/pnas.0306210101

10.1371/journal.pone.0050433

10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05781.x

10.2174/1874213000902010001

10.2174/1874213001003030001

10.1007/s00267-002-2790-8

Manly B. F., 2002, Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and design for field studies

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01831.x

10.1111/1365-2656.12111

10.1890/12-1688.1

10.1890/07-0260.1

Rambaldi G., 2006, Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 25, 1, 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x

10.1126/science.1241484

Schaller G. B., 1967, The deer and the tiger: a study of wildlife in India

10.2307/2989714

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00305.x

10.1098/rspb.2013.1506

10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.05.004

10.1017/S0030605312001408

10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.011

10.1111/ele.12372

10.1890/13-0336.1

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x

10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.7

10.1890/08-0606.1

10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485

10.1371/journal.pone.0060590

10.1017/CBO9780511614774

WWF‐India, 2011, Large carnivores in the select area of Kanha‐Achanakmar wildlife corridor

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.007

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Ecology and Evolution

Tập 5 Số 6

1354-1367

Thông tin tác giả