Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

Conservation Letters - Tập 7 Số 3 - Trang 149-157 - 2014
Joern Fischer1, David J. Abson2, Van Butsic3,4, M. Jahi Chappell5,6, Johan Ekroos7, Jan Hanspach1, Tobias Kuemmerle8, Henrik G. Smith7,9, Henrik von Wehrden10,1,2,11
1Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Scharnhorststrasse 1, 21335 Lueneburg, Germany
2Futures Research Center, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Scharnhorststrasse 1, 21335 Lueneburg, Germany
3Geography Department, Humboldt-University Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
4Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO), Theodor-Lieser-Str.2, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
5Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 2105 First Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, 55404 USA
6School of the Environment, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA, 98686-9600 USA
7Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Ecology Building, 22362 Lund, Sweden
8Geography Department & Integrative Research Institute on Human‐Environment Systems (IRI THESys) Humboldt‐University Berlin Germany
9Department of Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, 22362 Lund, Sweden
10Center for Methods, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Scharnhorststrasse 1, 21335 Lueneburg, Germany
11Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Savoyen Strasse 1, Vienna 1160, Austria

Tóm tắt

AbstractTo address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (“land sharing”) and separation (“land sparing”) of conservation and production. Controversy has arisen around this framework partly because many scholars have focused specifically on food production rather than more encompassing notions such as land scarcity or food security. Controversy further surrounds the practical value of partial trade‐off analyses, the ways in which biodiversity should be quantified, and a series of scale effects that are not readily accounted for. We see key priorities for the future in (1) addressing these issues when using the existing framework, and (2) developing alternative, holistic ways to conceptualise challenges related to food, biodiversity, and land scarcity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1186/2048‐7010‐2‐2

10.1596/1813-9450-4642

10.1016/j.jeem.2013.01.001

Bommarco R., 2012, Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security, Trends Ecol. Evol

10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01887.x

10.1111/cobi.12046

Chappell M.J., 2013, Oxford handbook on food, politics and society

10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4

10.1890/09.WB.011

10.1073/pnas.1016799108

10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.038

10.1073/pnas.1216303110

10.2307/3544901

10.1890/11-0206.1

10.1126/science.1078710

10.1126/science.334.6056.593-a

10.1890/070019

10.1017/S1464793105006950

10.1038/nature10452

10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 1996, The Rome declaration on world food security and world food summit plan of action

10.1111/1365-2664.12035

10.1016/j.baae.2010.09.001

10.1111/conl.12050

Garnett T., 2012, Sustainable intensification in agriculture. Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. A report on a workshop

10.1126/science.1185383

10.2307/1313298

10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.001

10.1126/science.1106049

10.1038/285568a0

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01528.x

Kendall H.W., 1994, Constraints on the expansion of the global food supply, Ambio, 23, 198

10.1073/pnas.1100480108

10.1890/04-0367

10.1079/AJAA200345

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00442.x

10.1073/pnas.1014773107

10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00229.x

10.1890/080023

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00111.x

10.1017/CBO9780511807763

10.1080/03066150903143079

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00572.x

10.1073/pnas.0905455107

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00248.x

10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.008

10.1126/science.1208742

10.2307/1311782

Pingali P.L., 2007, Handbook of agricultural economics, 2779

10.1073/pnas.0912953109

10.1016/j.jeem.2003.11.003

10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022

10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00201-4

10.1086/284880

10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.021

10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7

10.1007/s10021-012-9552-0

10.1890/13.WB.008

Sen A., 1981, Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation

10.1073/pnas.1117622109

10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00687.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040493.x

10.1086/341532

10.1073/pnas.1116437108

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068

10.3897/natureconservation.1.2786

10.1126/science.308.5726.1257b

Waggoner P.E., 1996, How much land can ten billion people spare for nature?, Daedalus, 125, 73

Wittman H.K., 2010, Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature and community, 91

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00208.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Letters

Tập 7 Số 3

149-157

Thông tin tác giả