Labouring for Livelihoods: Gender, Productivity and Collectivity

The Indian Journal of Labour Economics - Tập 63 - Trang 21-37 - 2020
Bina Agarwal1
1Development Economics and Environment, Global Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Tóm tắt

Current debates in India on work, employment and labour markets have paid rather little attention to three important distinctions: between sustainable livelihoods and labour force participation; between autonomously managing non-family enterprises versus participation in decision-making within the confines of family enterprises; and between cooperation among workers for larger economic returns versus atomised individuals competing for work or livelihoods in unequal markets. This paper conceptually outlines the importance of focusing on work through the lens of livelihoods, autonomy and collectivity, especially for women. Empirically, it analyses whether group farming, wherein women farmers voluntarily pool land, labour, capital and skills to cultivate jointly, while sharing costs and benefits, can help them overcome their production constraints, create viable livelihoods, and gain autonomous identities as farmers? How well can women’s group farms perform in comparison with male-managed small family farms? Based on meticulously undertaken primary surveys of group farming in Kerala and Telangana, the paper compares all-women group farms with largely male-managed small family farms in the same state, in terms of productivity and profits. It also examines the impact on women’s skill capabilities and status, which state is more effective and why, and the lessons these experiences hold for replication elsewhere. New and emerging experiments with farmers’ collectives in eastern India and Gujarat, including all-male and mixed-gender groups, suggest that the group farming model can be adapted effectively to varying contexts. The paper thus demonstrates the importance and potential of transforming the institutions within which work is done, in order to enhance both worker well-being and productivity gains. In conclusion, it reflects on the concept of the Social and Solidarity Economy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agarwal, B. 2019a. Does group farming empower women? Lessons from India’s experiments. Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1628020.

Agarwal, B., Anthwal, P., and Mahesh, M. 2020. Which women own land in India? Between diverse data sets, measures and laws, draft. University of Manchester UK.

Agarwal, B., and S. Vercelli. 2005. Psychology, rationality and economic behaviour: Questioning standard assumptions. London: Palgrave.

FAO. 2011. The state of food and agriculture report. Women in Agriculture. Rome: UN FAO.

Foster, A. D., and M. Rosenzweig. 2011. Are Indian farms too small? Providence: Brown University, mimeo.

GoI. 2019. Agricultural census of India, 2015–16, All India Report on Number and Area of Operational Holdings, Government of India.

Goyal, S.K. 1966. Cooperative farming in India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

Shivamaggi, H.B. 1958. Cooperative farming in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 5 (2): 139–153.

Smith, A. 1759 [1966]. The theory of moral sentiments, vol. 1. Reproductions of economic classics. New York: Augustus M, Kelly.

Sugden, F., B. Agarwal, S. Leder, P. Saikia, M. Raut, A. Kumar, and D. Ray. 2020. Experiments in farmer collectives in eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits and challenges, mimeo.