Labels and the Adjudication of Rape: Words Matter

Sexuality & Culture - Tập 26 - Trang 1579-1598 - 2022
Mara K. Berkland1, Yadong Ji1, Supna C. Jain1
1Department of Communication & Media Studies, North Central College, Naperville, USA

Tóm tắt

Those involved in the adjudication of sexual assault often communicate as much or more concern for the leveling of an inaccurate accusation against the accused than for the effect of the crime on the victim. Gender roles that influence perceptions of sexual assault responsibility have long been credited for the stalemate in the prevention of and justice for sexual violence. This study directly examines whether linguistic labels of sexual misconduct influence the perception of both criminal wrong-doing and the imposition of sanctions. This project hypothesizes that lexical choices in sexual assault labels can elicit or stifle gender stereotypes and rape myths that ultimately encourage a particular perception of the violation and potential sanction for an offense. Using a sample of 152 college students, this study uses a hypothetical scenario paired with three different linguistic labels (rape, sexual assault, non-consensual sexual intercourse) and found that the terms rape and sexual assault negatively correlated to findings of guilt.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alhassan, S. N. (2014). Sexism and gender stereotyping in the Dagbanli language. Gender & Language, 8(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v8i3.393 Anderson, R. E., Tarasoff, L. A., VanKim, N., & Flanders, C. (2021). Differences in rape acknowledgment and mental health outcomes across transgender, nonbinary, and cisgender bisexual youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), 7717–7739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519829763 Angelone, D. J., Cantor, N., Marcantonio, T., & Joppa, M. (2020). Does sexism mediate the gender and rape myth acceptance relationship? Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913632 Baldwin-White, A., Thompson, M. S., & Gray, A. (2016). Pre-and postintervention factor analysis of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 25(6), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71 Bosman, J. (2019, July 5). Elite kid justice: Are privileged teenagers more likely to get a slap on the wrist? New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/05/us/rich-privilege-courts.html Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217 Byers, E. S. (1980). Female communication of consent and nonconsent to sexual intercourse. Journal of the New Brunswick Psychological Association, 5, 12–18. Chan, S. (2007). Gray rape’: A new form of date rape? City Room New York Times [Blog]. https://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/gray-rape-a-new-form-of-date-rape/ Clark, M. D., & Carroll, M. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9373-3 Cooper, C. (2015). Words matter: How language reflects our response to sexual violence. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/women/publications/perspectives/2015/winter/how_language_reflects_our_response_sexual_violence/ Custers, K., & McNallie, J. (2017). The relationship between television sports exposure and rape myth acceptance: The mediating role of sexism and sexual objectification of women. Violence against Women, 23(7), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216651340 Dripps, D. (2008). After rape law: Will the turn to consent normalize the prosecution of sexual assault. Akron Law Review, 41(4), 957–980. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593 Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Gattuso, R. (2018). Is there a ‘gray zone’ in consent? Feministing. http://feministing.com/2018/05/11/is-there-a-gray-zone-in-consent/ Grady, C. (2017). The complicated, inadequate language of sexual violence. Vox. https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/11/30/16644394/language-sexual-violence Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Semantic prosody and judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(7), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000178 Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications. Hayes, A. F., & Montoya, A. K. (2017). A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing an interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1271116 Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996 Husak, D. N., & Thomas, G. C. (1992). Date rape, social convention, and reasonable mistakes. Law and Philosophy, 11(1/2), 95–126. Husak, D. N., & Thomas, G. C. (2001). Rapes without rapists: Consent and reasonable mistake. Philosophical Issues, 11, 86–117. Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739 Kahan, D. M. (2010). Culture, cognition, and consent: Who perceives what, and why, in acquaintance-rape cases. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 729–813. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20698345 Kim, Y., Lee, E., & Lee, H. (2019). Sexual double standard, dating violence recognition, and sexual assertiveness among university students in South Korea. Asian Nursing Research, 13(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.003 Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x] Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704 Maier, S. L. (2008). Rape victim advocates’ perception of the influence of race and ethnicity on victims’ responses to rape. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6(4), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377930802533530 Martinez, T., Wiersma-Mosley, J. D., Jozkowski, K. N., & Becnel, J. (2018). Good guys don’t rape: Greek and non-Greek college student perpetrator rape myths. Behavioral Sciences, 8(7), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8070060 McConnell-Ginet, S. (1980). Linguistics and the feminist challenge. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, & N. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in culture and society (pp. 3–25). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. McConnell-Ginet, S. (2010). Gender, sexuality, and meaning: Linguistic practice and politics. Oxford University Press. McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71 Mettler, K. (2019, July 3). Judge said a teen from a ‘good family’ should not be tried as an adult in sexual assault. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/03/judge-says-teen-good-family-should-not-be-tried-sexual-assault-an-adult/ Noland, V. J., Daley, E. M., Drolet, J. C., Fetro, J. V., Brown, K. R. M., Hassell, C. D., & McDermott, R. J. (2004). Connotative interpretations of sexuality-related terms. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5462-8 Pascoe, C. J., & Hollander, J. A. (2016). Good guys don’t rape: Gender, domination, and mobilizing rape. Gender & Society, 30(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215612707 Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238 Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.551851 Raphael, J. (2013). Rape is rape: How denial, distortion, and victim blaming are fueling a hidden acquaintance rape crisis. Chicago Review Press. Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2 Seabrook, R. C., & Ward, L. M. (2019). Bros will be bros? The effect of fraternity membership on perceived culpability for sexual assault. Violence against Women, 25(12), 1471–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218820196 Shaw, J., Campbell, R., Cain, D., & Feeney, H. (2017). Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records. Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000072 Siefkes-Andrew, A. J., & Alexopoulos, C. (2019). Framing blame in sexual assault: An analysis of attribution in news stories about sexual assault on college campuses. Violence against Women, 25(6), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218801111 Sommer, S., Reynolds, J. J., & Kehn, A. (2016). Mock juror perceptions of rape victims: Impact of case characteristics and individual differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2847–2866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581907 Stuart, S. M., McKimmie, B. M., & Masser, B. M. (2019). Rape perpetrators on trial: The effect of sexual assault-related schemas on attributions of blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(2), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640777 Walsh, K., Sarvet, A. L., Wall, M., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J., Khan, S., ... & Mellins, C. A. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault perpetration and ambiguous consent in a representative sample of college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518823293 Winsor, M. (2016). Scathing letter to father of Stanford sex offender Brock Turner goes viral: A North Carolina father wrote a powerful open letter to Dan Turner. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/scathing-letter-father-stanford-sex-offender-brock-turner/story?id=39723664 Yndo, M. C., & Zawacki, T. (2020). Factors influencing labeling nonconsensual sex as sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7–8), 1803–1827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517699948