LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION1

Journal of the American Water Resources Association - Tập 34 Số 1 - Trang 91-101 - 1998
Raghavan Srinivasan, Tharacad Ramanarayanan, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Steven T. Bednarz1
1(e-m (Arnold): [email protected]).; 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas 76502; Civil Engineer, USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service; Hydraulic Engineer, USDA-ARS; Respectively, Assistant Professor and Postdoctoral Research Associate, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT: This paper describes the application of a river basin scale hydrologic model (described in Part I) to Richland and Chambers Creeks watershed (RC watershed) in upper Trinity River basin in Texas. The inputs to the model were accumulated from hydro‐graphic and geographic databases and maps using a raster‐based GIS. Available weather data from 12 weather stations in and around the watershed and stream flow data from two USGS stream gauge station for the period 1965 to 1984 were used in the flow calibration and validation. Sediment calibration was carried out for the period 1988 through 1994 using the 1994 sediment survey data from the Richland‐Chambers lake. Sediment validation was conducted on a subwatershed (Mill Creek watershed) situated on Chambers Creek of the RC watershed. The model was evaluated by well established statistical and visual methods and was found to explain at least 84 percent and 65 percent of the variability in the observed stream flow data for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. In addition, the model predicted the accumulated sediment load within 2 percent and 9 percent from the observed data for the RC watershed and Mill Creek watershed, respectively.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arnold J. G. 1992.Spatial Scale Variability in Model Development and Parameterization.Ph.D. Dissertation Agricultural Engineering Department Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana pg.186.

10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x

Hession W. C., 1998, A Geographic Information System for Targeting Non‐Point Source Agricultural Pollution, J. Soil and Water Conserv, 43, 264

Mamillapalli S. R.Srinivasan J. G.Arnold andB. A.Engel January 2125 1996.Effect of Spatial Variability on Basin Scale Modeling. In:Proc. Third International NCGIA Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling Sante Fe New Mexico.

10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

Pelletier R. E., 1985, Evaluating Nonpoint Source Pollution Using Remotely Sensed Data in Soil Erosion Models, J. Soil Water Conserv, 40, 332

Rewerts C. C., 1991, ANSWERS on GRASS: Integrating a Watershed Simulation with a GIS

10.13031/2013.27892

Shapiro M., 1992, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Reference Manual

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03304.x

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03303.x

Tim U. S., 1991, Identification of Critical Nonpoint Pollution Source Area Using Geographic Information Systems and Simulation Modeling

Welborn C. T., 1967, Comparative Results of Sediment Sampling with the Texas Sampler and the Depth‐Integrating Samplers and Specific Weight of Fluvial Sediment Deposits in Texas, 109