Knowledge management in the Chinese public sector: empirical investigation

Emerald - Tập 2 Số 3 - Trang 250-263 - 2007
XiaomingCong1, RichardLi‐Hua2, GeorgeStonehouse3
1University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, People's Republic of China
2Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3Napier University Business School, Napier University, Scotland, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to examine knowledge management (KM) processes and its implementation in the public sector in China and seeks to identify success factors that influence KM and attempts to address various key issues in the process in a hope to raise awareness of KM as a potential solution to improve the performance in the public sector.Design/methodology/approachA case study and research experience are presented.FindingsThe study suggests that KM in the public sector still in its infancy and has a long way to go in the KM journey. However, the study has identified a certain number of factors that are essential to the success of the KM initiative and program in the public sector, of which, the appropriateness and effectiveness of knowledge sharing is more important in the public sector than in the private sector. The study examines current situation in terms of KM activities in the public sector in China and fuelled the debate concerning KM in the public sector.Practical implicationsThe outcome of the research could have significant implications for KM programs in public sector organizations in China.Originality/valueThis study is a comprehensive examination and analysis of the process of KM and its implementation in the public sector in China, incorporating both the cultural and organizational factors that play a role in the whole process. The paper describes and develops a framework of KM processes and implementation in the public sector as well as recommendations to practitioners about planning and implementing KM programs and initiatives.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

APQC (2002), “Retaining valuable knowledge: proactive strategies to deal with a shifting work force”, Consortium Learning Forum Best‐Practice Report, APQC, Houston, TX.

Boyne, G.A. (2002), “Public and private management: what's the difference?”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 97‐122.

Brewerton, P. and Millward, L. (2001), Organizational Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Bryman, A. (2001), Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cohen, W. and Leventhal, D. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128‐52.

Creswell, J.W. (2003), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage, London.

Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Drucker, P.F. (1954), The Practice of Management, Harper & Row, New York, NY.

Drucker, P.F. (1974), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, Harper & Row, New York, NY.

Drucker, P.F. (1993), Post‐capitalist Society, Harper Business, New York, NY.

Ghauri, P., Gronhaugh, K. and Kristianslund, I. (1995), Research Methods in Business Studies – A Practical Guide, Prentice‐Hall, New York, NY.

Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999), “What's your strategy for managing knowledge”, Harvard Business Review, March‐April, pp. 106‐16.

Heffron, F. (1989), Organization Theory and Public Organizations, Prentice‐Hall, New York, NY.

Herzberg, F.W. et al. (1959), The Motivation to Work, Wiley, New York, NY.

Hood, C. (1991), “A public management for all seasons?”, Public Administration, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 3‐19.

Hughes, O.E. (1994), Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, St Martin's Press, New York, NY.

Jankowizc, D. (2005), Business Research Projects, 4th ed., Thomson Learning, London.

Lane, J.E. (2000), The Public Sector Concepts, Models and Approaches, 3rd ed., Sage, London, 304‐305, 315‐317.

Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1969), Organization and Environment, Irwin Dorsey, London.

Lawton, A. and Rose, A. (1994), Organization and Management in the Public Sector, 2nd ed., Pitman Publishing, London, pp. 6‐8.

Liebowitz, J. and Beckman, T. (1998), Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manager Should Know, St Lucie Press, New York, NY.

McGregor, D. (1960), The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row, New York, NY.

Murray, M. (1975), “Comparing public and private management: an exploratory essay”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 35, pp. 364‐71.

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

O'Dell, C. and Grayson, C.J. (1998), “If only we know what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices”, California Management Review, Summer, pp. 9‐25.

Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1993), Reinvesting Government, A Plum/Penguin Book, New York, NY.

Pollitt, C. (1990), Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo‐American Experience, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Rainey, H., Backoff, R. and Levine, C. (1976), “Comparing public and private organizations”, Public Administration Review, March/April, p. 234.

Rice, A.K. (1963), The Enterprise and its Environment: A System Theory of Management Organization, Tavistock Publications, London.

Schein, E.H. (1996), “The cultures of management: the key to organizational learning”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp. 9‐19.

Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 27‐43.

Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R. (1991), “Organizational memory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, January, pp. 57‐92.

Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London.

Yu, D. and Hartman, C. (2000), “Washington's knowledge management pioneer”, Knowledge Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 1.

Zack, M.H. (1999b), “Managing codified knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 45‐58.

Cohen, D. (1998), “Toward a knowledge context: report on the first annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on knowledge and the firm”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 22‐39.

Cong, X.M. and Pandya, K. (2003), “Issues of knowledge management in the public sector”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 25‐33.

Cong, X.M., Pandya, K. and Duan, Y.Q. (2004), “Knowledge retention in the public sector”, Proceedings of 5th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Paris, September, 2004.