Key issues surrounding virtual chat reference model

Reference Services Review - 2009
Gang (Gary)Wan1, DennisClark1, JohnFullerton1, GailMacmillan1, Deva E.Reddy1, JaneStephens1, DanielXiao1
1Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the use of co‐browse in live chat, customers' question types, referral to subject experts, and patrons' usage patterns as experienced in the virtual reference (VR) chat reference services at Texas A&M University Libraries.Design/methodology/approachChat transcripts from 2005 to 2007 were sampled and analyzed by peer reviewers. Statistical data in that period were also examined. A set of methods and a pilot study were created to define the measurement components such as question types, expert handling, and co‐browsing.FindingsCo‐browsing is used in 38 percent of the sampled chat sessions. The Texas A&M University live chat service group considers co‐browsing a useful feature. Of questions received on VR, 84 percent are reference questions. Only 8.7 percent of the total questions or 10 percent of the reference questions need to be answered by subject experts. The use of VR increases dramatically in the past two years at the Texas A&M University. The findings also reveal users' logon patterns over weekdays and weekends.Originality/valueThe study contributes and advances understanding in the role VR plays in a large academic library and the role co‐browsing plays in VR services. The study also provides a comprehensive method for transcript and usage data analysis. It is believed that a similar methodology may be replicated elsewhere by other institutions engaging similar services or evaluation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kern, M. (2006), “Looking at the bigger picture: an integrated approach to evaluation of chat reference services”, Reference Librarian, Vol. 46 Nos 95/96, pp. 99‐112.

Krejcie, R. and Morgan, D. (1970), “Determining sample size for research activities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 607‐10.

Kwon, N. and Gregory, V. (2006), “The effects of librarians' behavioral performance on user satisfaction in chat reference services”, Reference & User Services Quarterly, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 137‐48.

Luo, L. (2007), “Chat reference evaluation: a framework of perspectives and measures”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 71‐85.

MacDonald, K. and VanDuinkerken, W. (2005), “Distance education and virtual reference: implementing a marketing plan at Texas A&M University”, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 29‐40.

McGraw, K., Heiland, J. and Harris, J.C. (2003), “Promotion and evaluation of a virtual live reference service”, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 41‐53.

Moyo, L. (2006), “Virtual reference services and instruction: an assessment”, Reference Librarian, Vol. 46 Nos 95/96, pp. 213‐30.

Nilsen, K. and Ross, C. (2006), “Evaluating virtual reference from the users' perspective”, Reference Librarian, Vol. 46 Nos 95/96, pp. 53‐79.

Pomerantz, J. and Luo, L. (2006), “Motivations and uses: evaluating virtual reference service from the users' perspective”, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 350‐73.

Saxton, M.L. and Richardson, J.V. Jr. (2002), Understanding Reference Transactions: Transforming an Art into a Science, Academic Press, Amsterdam, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Reference Services Review

Thông tin tác giả