Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills
Tóm tắt
Introductory biology courses are widely criticized for overemphasizing details and rote memorization of facts. Data to support such claims, however, are surprisingly scarce. We sought to determine whether this claim was evidence-based. To do so we quantified the cognitive level of learning targeted by faculty in introductory-level biology courses. We used Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives to assign cognitive learning levels to course goals as articulated on syllabi and individual items on high-stakes assessments (i.e., exams and quizzes). Our investigation revealed the following: 1) assessment items overwhelmingly targeted lower cognitive levels, 2) the cognitive level of articulated course goals was not predictive of the cognitive level of assessment items, and 3) there was no influence of course size or institution type on the cognitive levels of assessments. These results support the claim that introductory biology courses emphasize facts more than higher-order thinking.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1989, Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology
AAAS, 2009, Vision and Change Conference
American Association of Medical Colleges and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 2009, Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians
Anderson L. W., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Bhola D. S., 2003, EM:IP, 22, 21
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain In: New York: Longmans, Green.
Bransford J., 1999, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School
Entwistle N. J., 1983, Understanding Student Learning
Evans C., 1999, Education, 119, 616
Fink L. D., 2003, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses
Fuller D., 1997, J. Athl. Train., 32, 342
Handelsman J., 2007, Scientific Teaching
Krathwohl D. R., Bloom B. S., Masia B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook II: The Affective Domain In: New York: David McKay Company.
Kreitzer A. E., 1994, Bloom's Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective, 64
La Marca P. M., Redfield D., Winter P. C., Despriet L. (2000). State standards and state assessment systems: A guide to alignment. Series on standards and assessments In: Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, 2007, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future
National Research Council (NRC), 2002, High Schools
NRC, 2003, BIO2010, Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists
NRC, 2007, Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8
National Science Foundation, 1996, Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology
R Development Core Team, 2009, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
Wiggins G. P., 2005, Understanding by Design