Just plain peers across social networks: Peer-feedback networks nested in personal and academic networks in higher education

Angelillo, 2006, Examining shared endeavors by abstracting video coding schemes with fidelity to cases, 189 Askew, 2000, Gifts, ping- pong and loops – Linking feedback and learning, 1 Bastian, 2009, Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks Beaumont, 2011, Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning?, Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671, 10.1080/03075071003731135 Bellotti, 2015 Berg, 1999, The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5 Bolibar, 2016, Macro, meso, micro: Broadening the ‘social’ of social network analysis with a mixed methods approach, Quality and Quantity, 50, 2217, 10.1007/s11135-015-0259-0 Bonacich, 1972, Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113, 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806 Borgatti, 2005, Centrality and network flow, Social Networks, 27, 55, 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 Borgatti, 2014, Social network research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies, 1 Borgatti, 2011, On network theory, Organization Science, 22, 1168, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641 Borgatti, 2003, Ethical and strategic issues in organizational social network analysis, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 337, 10.1177/0021886303258111 Boud, 2000, Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society, Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151, 10.1080/713695728 Boud, 2001, Peer learning and assessment, 67 Boud, 2006, Aligning assessment with long-term learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 399, 10.1080/02602930600679050 Boud Boud, 2013, What is the problem with feedback?, 1 Boud, 2013, Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698, 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 Brill, 2011, Investigating peer review as an intentional learning strategy to foster collaborative knowledge-building in students of instructional design, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23, 114 Burt, 1992 Carless, 2013, Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback, 90 Carrington, 2014, Social network research, 35 2005 Cho, 2007, Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community, Computers & Education, 49, 309, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003 Cho, 2002, Social information sharing in a CSCL community, 43 Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 20, 328, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 Crossley, 2010, The social world of the network: Combining qualitative and quantitative elements in social network analysis, Sociologica, 1 Crossley, 2015 Crossley, 2009, Social network analysis: Introduction to special issue, Methodological Innovations Online, 4, 1, 10.1177/205979910900400101 Dawson, 2008, A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 224 De Laat, 2007, Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 87, 10.1007/s11412-007-9006-4 De Laat, 2014, Unfolding perspectives on networked professional learning: Exploring ties and time, Frontline Learning Research, 2, 72 DiPardo, 1988, Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions, Review of Educational Research, 58, 119, 10.3102/00346543058002119 Edwards Evans, 2013, Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education, Review of Educational Research, 83, 70, 10.3102/0034654312474350 Falchikov, 2001 Falchikov, 2005 Freeman, 1979, Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215, 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 Freeman, 1996, Some antecedents of social network analysis, Connections, 19, 39 Freeman, 2004 Gielen, 2010, Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 304, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 Granovetter, 1973, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360, 10.1086/225469 Granovetter, 1983, The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited, Sociological Theory, 1, 201, 10.2307/202051 Greene, 2011, Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in social inquiry, 259 Grunspan, 2014, Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer fro social network analysis in educational research, CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 167, 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0162 Hammer, 2014, Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 37, 10.1080/10508406.2013.802652 Hansen, 2005, Guiding principles for effective peer response, ELT Journal, 59, 31, 10.1093/elt/cci004 Hattie, 2007, The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77, 81, 10.3102/003465430298487 Haythornthwaite, 2001, Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class, The Information Society, 17, 211, 10.1080/01972240152493065 Haythornthwaite, 2002, Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities, 159 Haythornthwaite, 2008, Learning relations and networks in web-based communities, International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4, 140, 10.1504/IJWBC.2008.017669 Haythornthwaite, 1998, Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49, 1101, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:12<1101::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Z Hmelo-Silver, 2006, Soft leaders, hard artifacts, and the groups we rarely see: Using video to understand peer learning processes, 255 Hollstein, 2014, Mixed methods social network research: An introduction, 3 Hyland, 2006, Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback, 206 Jehn, 1997, Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775 Johnson, 2004, Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researcher, 33, 14, 10.3102/0013189X033007014 Katz, 2004, Network theory and small groups, Small Group Research, 35, 307, 10.1177/1046496404264941 Khokhar, 2015 Knoblauch, 2012, Video-analysis: Methodological aspects of interpretive audiovisual analysis in social research, 9 Kossinets, 2006, Effects of missing data in social networks, Social Networks, 28, 247, 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002 Krippendorff, 2013 Lave, 1996, Teaching, as learning in practice, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 149, 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2 Lave, 1991 Liu, 2006, Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment, Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279, 10.1080/13562510600680582 London, 2015 2013 Moreno, 1934 Narciss, 2008, Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks, 126 Nardi, 2002, NetWORKers and their activity in intentional networks, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205, 10.1023/A:1015241914483 Nicol, 2010, From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501, 10.1080/02602931003786559 Nicol, 2013, Peer review: Putting feedback processes in students' hands, 4, 111 Nicol, 2006, Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199, 10.1080/03075070600572090 Nicol, 2013, Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 102, 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 Opsahl, 2010, Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths, Social Networks, 32, 245, 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006 Patchan, 2015, Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers' texts of varying quality, Instructional Science, 43, 591, 10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x Poverjuc, 2012, Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: A multiple case study, Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 465, 10.1080/13562517.2011.641008 Sadler, 2010, Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535, 10.1080/02602930903541015 Sadler, 2013, Opening up feedback: Teaching learners to see, 54 Sambell, 2016, Assessment and feedback in higher education: Considerable room for improvement, Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1 Schoenfeld, 1992, On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 179, 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_3 Scott, 2013 Sfard, 1998, On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27, 4, 10.3102/0013189X027002004 Shah, 1993, Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149, 10.1007/BF01884769 Strijbos, 2014, Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess, 87 Strijbos, 2010, Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?, Learning and Instruction, 20, 291, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 Strijbos, 2010, Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments, Learning and Instruction, 20, 265, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 Teddlie, 2009 Topping, 1998, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249 Topping, 2005, Trends in peer learning, Educational Psychology, 25, 631, 10.1080/01443410500345172 Van Gennip, 2010, Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions, Learning and Instruction, 20, 280, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 Villamil, 1996, Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies and aspects of social behavior, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6 Villamil, 2006, Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback, 23 Vygotsky, 1978 Wald, 2014, Triangulation and validity of network data, 65 Wasserman, 1994 Wenger, 1998 Wingate, 2010, The impact of formative assessment on the development of academic writing, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 519, 10.1080/02602930903512909 Winstone, 2017, Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes, Educational Psychologist, 52, 17, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 Wölfer, 2015, Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra- and intergroup behavior, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 45, 10.1037/gdn0000021 Yang, 2013, The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes, Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285, 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 Zhu, 2012, Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective, TESOL Quarterly, 46, 362, 10.1002/tesq.22