Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item

Journal of Orthopaedic Science - Tập 12 - Trang 241-248 - 2007
Mitsuru Fukui1,2, Kazuhiro Chiba3,2, Mamoru Kawakami4,2, Shin-ichi Kikuchi5,2, Shin-ichi Konno5,2, Masabumi Miyamoto6,2, Atsushi Seichi7,2, Tadashi Shimamura8,2, Osamu Shirado9,2, Toshihiko Taguchi10,2, Kazuhisa Takahashi11,2, Katsushi Takeshita7,2, Toshikazu Tani12,2, Yoshiaki Toyama4,2, Eiji Wada13,2, Kazuo Yonenobu14,2, Takashi Tanaka15,2, Yoshio Hirota16,2
1Laboratory of Statistics, Osaka City University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
2The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan
9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical School, Irima-gun, Japan
10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
12Department of Orthopaedics, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan
13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hoshigaoka Koseinenkin Hospital, Osaka, Japan
14National Hospital Organization Osaka-Minami Medical Center, Kawachinagano, Japan
15Department of Internal Medicine, Houai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
16Department of Public Health, Osaka City University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Tóm tắt

A new self-administered questionnaire as an outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy was drawn up in Part 1 (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire, JOACMEQ). Because a question with regard to driving a car (C-41) was not suitable for this patient group, the authors composed an alternative question related to neck motion (C-41-2). The purposes of the present study were to perform a secondary survey on patients with cervical myelopathy and to statistically analyze the responses to validate the JOACMEQ, and also to determine if it was possible to convert item C-41 to the alternative question. A member of the Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation from each hospital administered the questionnaire to more than 50 patients with cervical myelopathy in each hospital. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, 24 of which were extracted in the primary survey. The authors statistically examined whether it was possible to convert question C-41 to C-41-2. Three hundred and sixty-eight patients with cervical myelopathy were enrolled in the present study. No questions elicited no answer or “I am not sure” in more than 5% of patients except question C-41. There were no questions that the patients answered with difficulty. There was no tendency that was concentrated on one option as an answer to questions. There was a high correlation between questions C-41 and C-41-2. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and κ value showed that there was high coincidence between the two questions C-41 and C-41-2. It is possible to convert the question C-41 to the alternative question C41-2. The questionnaire has sufficient reliability for clinical use. It is possible that the JOACMEQ will prevail and become a global standard to evaluate outcomes in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

InstitutionalAuthorNameThe Study Group for new JOA score (2007) ArticleTitleAn outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: New Japanese Orthopaedic Association score: Part 1 J Orthop Sci 12 227–40 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00776-007-1118-1 Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1975;99: prefatory note (in Japanese) Revised Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1994;68:490–503 (in Japanese) S Fukuhara Y Suzugamo S Bito K Kurokawa (2001) Manual of SF-36: Japanese version 1.2 Public Health Research Foundation Tokyo M Fukui Y Hirota (2004) ArticleTitleBasic knowledge to establish criteria for the assessment of medical treatment Spine Spinal Cord 17 18–25