Is the standardization of human resource practices perceived as fair across national cultures?

Baltic Journal of Management - Tập 4 Số 2 - Trang 127-148 - 2009
RandiLunnan1, LauraElizabeth Mercer Traavik2
1Department of Strategy and Logistics, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway
2Department of Leadership and Organisational Management, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate perceptions of fairness of a standardized performance appraisal in a multinational enterprise. The paper looks at the first step in understanding fairness perceptions by examining whether national culture influences the view on standardization itself and by comparing China, Lithuania, and Norway.Design/methodology/approachAn experiment using a scenario that outlined a performance appraisal tool in a multinational company is conducted. National culture and individual cultural values are the independent variables and the perception of fairness of the practice is the dependent variable. A sample of 80 management respondents from Lithuania, China, and Norway is taken.FindingsThe findings suggest that national culture influences perceptions of fairness of a standardized performance appraisal tool. Employees from countries undergoing profound economic and political change, that score low on the cultural dimension of self‐expression, tend to see the standardized tool as more fair than employees from a stable country high on self‐expression. Differences in fairness perception at the individual level are found, where respondents high on power distance had higher perceptions of fairness of a standardized tool. Both national and individual levels measures of culture affected perceptions.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is small; however, the differences are strong and indicate that perceptions of fairness vary. The experimental design allows good control, although it can limit generalizability to the field.Practical implicationsMultinational companies must understand that before analysis and choice of specific human resource practices it is important that they are aware of national and individual cultural differences towards standardization itself. Cultural differences affect reactions not only to the specific human practice but also to the standardization. Companies can use dimensions such as power distance and the survival/self‐expression dimension to understand the response of their employees. Being aware of this challenge may lead multinationals to pursue more fine‐tuned ways of communicating and implementing a standardized practice.Originality/valueUsing experiments to understand the implementation of practices in multinational organizations it is identified that, before deciding whether a practice should be locally adapted or standardized, the first step is to find out how standardization itself is perceived.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ambrose, M.L. (2002), “Contemporary justice research: a new look at familiar questions”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 89 No. 1, pp. 803‐12.

Bailey, J.R., Chen, C.C. and Dou, S. (1997), “Conceptions of self and performance‐related feedback in the US, Japan and China”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 605‐25.

Bartlett, B.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1992), Transnational Management, Irwin, Boston, MA.

Bjørkman, I. and Lu, Y. (1999), “The management of human resources in Chinese‐Western joint ventures”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 306‐24.

Blader, S. and Tyler, T.R. (2003), “What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four component model of procedural justice”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 107‐26.

Blader, S., Chang, C.C. and Tyler, T.R. (2001), “Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: comparing cross‐nationally the importance of fair group processes”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 295‐311.

Boyacigiller, N., Kleinberg, J., Phillips, M. and Sackman, S. (2004), “Conceptualizing culture: elucidating the streams of research in international cross‐cultural management”, in Punnett, B.J. and Shenkar, O. (Eds), Handbook for International Management Research, 2nd ed., The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 99‐167.

Brockner, J., Chen, Y.‐R., Leung, K. and Skarlicki, D. (2000), “Culture and procedural fairness: when the effects of what you do depend on how you do it”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, March, pp. 138‐59.

Brockner, J., de Cremer, D., van den Bos, K. and Chen, Y. (2005), “The influence of interdependent self construal on procedural fairness effects”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 96, pp. 155‐67.

Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M.J., Francesco, A.M., Chen, Z.X., Leung, K., Bierbrauer, G., Gomez, C., Kirkman, B.L. and Shapiro, D.L. (2001), “Culture and procedural justice: the influence of power distance on reactions to voice”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 300‐15.

Cable, D.M. and Judge, T.A. (1994), “Pay preferences and job search decisions: a person‐organization fit perspective”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 317‐48.

Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C. and Ng, K. (2001), “Justice at the millennium: a meta‐analytic review for 25 years of organizational justice research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 425‐45.

Cropanzano, R. and Greenberg, J. (1997), “Progress in organizational justice: tunneling through the maze”, in Cooper, C.L. and Robertson, I.T. (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 317‐72.

Earley, P.C. and Gibson, C.B. (1998), “Taking stock in our progress on individualism‐collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community”, Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 265‐305.

Earley, P.C. and Mosakowski, E. (2004), “Cultural intelligence”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82 No. 10, pp. 139‐46.

Earley, P.C., Gibson, C.B. and Chen, C.C. (1999), “‘How did I do?’ versus ‘how did we do?’ Cultural contrasts of performance feedback use and self‐efficacy”, Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 594‐619.

Edstrom, A. and Galbraith, J. (1977), “Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, pp. 248‐63.

Feather, N.T. (1994), “Human values and their relation to justice”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 123‐51.

Gelfand, M.J., Erez, M. and Aycan, Z. (2007), “Cross‐cultural organizational behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 479‐514.

Ghemawat, P. (2007), Redefining Global Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Gooderham, P.N. and Brewster, C. (2003), “Convergence stasis or divergence? Personnel management in Europe. Beta”, The Scandinavian Journal of Business Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 6‐18.

Gooderham, P.N., Nordhaug, O. and Ringdal, K. (1999), “Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: human resource management in European firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 507‐31.

Greenberg, J. (1990), “Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, p. 399.

Greenberg, J. (2001), “Studying organizational justice cross‐culturally: fundamental challenges”, The International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 365‐75.

Greggersen, H., Morrison, A. and Black, J.S. (1998), “Developing leaders for the global frontiers”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp. 21‐32.

Hammerstrøm, S. and Lunnan, R. (2008), “Motivating employees to stay: a study of Norwegian firms in China”, in Lie, M., Lund, R. and Hansen, G.H. (Eds), Making It in China, Høyskoleforlaget, Kristiansand.

Hetrick, S. (2002), “Transferring HR ideas and practices: globalization and convergence in Poland”, Human Resource Development International, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 333‐51.

Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture's Consequences, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Hofstede, G. (2006), “What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers' minds versus respondents'”, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 882‐96.

Holden, N. (2001), “Knowledge management: raising the spectre of the cross‐cultural dimension”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 155‐63.

House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. and Gupta, V. (Eds) (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Huo, Y.P. and Huang, H.J. (2002), “Divergence or convergence? A cross‐national comparison of personnel selection practices”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 38‐54.

Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Post‐modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. (2000), “Modernization, cultural change and traditional values”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 19‐51.

James, K. (1993), “The social context of organizational justice: cultural, intergroup and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions”, in Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Lawrence‐Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R. (1991), “Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 125‐43.

Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B. and Gibson, C.B. (2006), “A quarter century of culture's consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 285‐320.

Laurent, A. (1986), “The cross‐cultural puzzle of international human resource management”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 91‐102.

Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York, NY.

Lind, E.A., Huo, Y.J. and Tyler, T.R. (1994), “…And justice for all: ethnicity, gender, and preferences for dispute resolution procedures”, Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 269‐90.

Lind, E.A., Tyler, T.R. and Huo, Y.H. (1997), “Procedural context and culture: variations in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 73 No. 4, pp. 767‐80.

Lindholm, N. (2000), “National culture and performance management in MNC subsidiaries”, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 45‐66.

Lu, Y. and Bjorkman, I. (1997), “HRM practices in China‐western joint ventures: MNC standardization versus localization”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 614‐28.

Lunnan, R., Lervik, J.E., Traavik, L., Amdam, R.P., Hennestad, B. and Nilsen, S. (2005), “Global transfer of management practices across nations and MNE subcultures”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 77‐81.

Lytle, A.L., Brett, J.M., Barsness, Z.I., Tinsely, C.H. and Janssens, M. (1995), “A paradigm for confirmatory cross‐cultural research in organizational behavior”, Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Stamford, CT, Vol. 17, pp. 167‐214.

McSweeney, B. (2002), “Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith – a failure of analysis”, Human Relations, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 89‐118.

Milliman, J., Nason, J., Gallagher, E., Huo, P., von Glinow, M.A. and Lowe, K. (1998), “The impact of national culture on human resource management practices: the case of performance appraisal”, Advances in International Comparative Management, JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp. 157‐83.

Mockaitis, A.I. (2002), “The national cultural dimensions of Lithuania”, Ekonomika, Vol. 59, pp. 67‐77.

Morris, M. and Leung, K. (2000), “Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 100‐32.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M. and Kemmelmeier, M. (2002), “Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta‐analyses”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 128 No. 1, pp. 3‐72.

Ozawa, K., Crosby, M. and Crosby, F. (1996), “Individualism and resistance to affirmative action: a comparison of Japanese and American samples”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26 No. 13, pp. 1138‐52.

Prahalad, C.K. and Doz, Y.L. (1987), Multinational Mission: Balancing Global Demands and Global Vision, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Rahim, M.A., Magner, N.R. and Shapiro, D.L. (2000), “Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors? What perceptions, precisely?”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 337‐49.

Ramamoorthy, N., Gupta, A., Sardessai, R.M. and Flood, P.C. (2005), “Individualism/collectivism and attitudes towards human resource systems: a comparative study of American, Irish and Indian MBA students”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 852‐69.

Robbins, T., Summers, T., Miller, J. and Hendrix, W. (2000), “Using the group‐value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice”, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 511‐18.

Rosenzweig, P.M. and Nohria, N. (1994), “Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 229‐51.

Rosenzweig, P.M. and Singh, J.V. (1991), “Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 340‐61.

Schuler, R.S. and Jackson, S.E. (1999), Strategic Human Resource Management, Blackwell, Oxford.

Scullion, H. and Linehan, M. (Eds) (2005), International Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, Palgrave, Basingstoke.

Shapiro, A.C. (1978), “Evaluation and control of foreign operations”, International Journal of Accounting, Education and Research, Vol. 14, pp. 83‐104.

Singelis, T.M. (1994), “The measurement of independent and interdependent self construals”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 580‐91.

Skarlicki, F. (2003), “HMR special issue: fairness and human resource management”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 1‐5.

Snape, E., Thompson, D., Yan, F.K.‐C. and Redman, T. (1998), “Performance appraisal and culture: practice and attitudes in Hong Kong and Great Britain”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 841‐61.

Spector, P.E. (2001), “An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994: a comparison of individual and country/province level results”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 50 No. 2, p. 269.

Tahvanainen, M. and Suutari, V. (2005), “Expatriate performance management in MNCs”, in Scullion, H. and Linehan, M. (Eds), International Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 91‐130.

Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., Renard, M.K., Harrison, J.K. and Carroll, S.J. (1995), “Due process in performance appraisal: a quasi‐experiment in procedural justice”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 495‐523.

Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

Tyler, T.R., Lind, E.A. and Huo, Y.J. (2000), “Cultural values and authority relations: the psychology of conflict resolution across cultures”, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 1138‐63.

Waldman, D.A., de Luque, M.S., Washburn, N., House, R.J., Adetoun, B. and Barrasa, A. et al. (2006), “Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 823‐37.

Zhu, C.J. (2005), Human Resource Management in China, Routledge Curzon, New York, NY.

Zhu, C.J. and Dowling, P.J. (2002), “Staffing practices in transition: some empirical evidence from China”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 569‐97.

Colquitt, J. (2001), “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation for a measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 386‐400.

Cropanzano, R. and Wright, T.A. (2003), “Procedural justice and organizational staffing: a tale of two paradigms”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 7‐39.

Folger, R. and Konovsky, M.A. (1989), “Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 115‐30.

Gerhart, B. and Fang, M. (2005), “National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 971‐86.

Ramamoorthy, N. and Carroll, S.J. (1998), “Individualism/collectivism orientations and reactions toward alternative human resource management practices”, Human Relations, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 571‐88.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Baltic Journal of Management

Tập 4 Số 2

127-148

Thông tin tác giả