Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology - Tập 75 Số 5 - Trang 808-817 - 2022
Diana B Galarraga1, Jay Pratt1, Brett A. Cochrane1
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00977

10.1093/brain/aws114

10.1162/jocn.2009.21054

10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.001

10.1037/xhp0000713

10.1177/2515245920903079

10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042

10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.003

10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371

10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.006

10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023

10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.007

10.1007/s004260100065

10.1080/135467996387552

10.1037/cep0000071

10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00010-4

10.1038/nn1066

10.1037/xhp0000369

10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.022

10.3758/BF03194011

10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32

10.1016/0028-3932(73)90049-3

10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00680

10.1016/0001-6918(75)90041-4

10.3758/s13414-018-1550-7

10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.005

10.3758/BF03195335

10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061

10.1037/a0024377

10.1007/s00221-019-05617-9

10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.015

10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102887

10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.020

10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416

10.3758/BF03212254

10.3758/BF03194010

10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001

10.3758/BF03194909

10.1111/1467-9280.00337

10.1037/h0027448

10.1037/h0020586

10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.001

10.1037/10867-000

10.1016/0028-3932(89)90040-7

10.1080/17470218.2014.903984

10.1177/0956797613479610

10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013

Wood G., 2008, Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489

10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121

Zanolie K., Pecher D. (2014). Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: A replication study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00987

10.1038/417138a