Is patient choice an effective mechanism to reduce waiting times?
Tóm tắt
In many countries, patient choice is a routine part of the normal healthcare system. However, many choice initiatives in secondary care are part of policies aimed at reducing waiting times. This article provides evidence on the effectiveness of patient choice as a mechanism to reduce waiting times within a metropolitan area. The London Patient Choice Project was a large-scale pilot offering patients on hospital waiting lists a choice of alternative hospitals with shorter waiting times. A total of 22 500 patients were offered choice and 15 000 accepted. The acceptance rate of 66% was very high by international standards. In this article we address two questions. First, did the introduction of choice significantly reduce waiting times in London relative to the rest of the country where there was no choice? Second, how were the waiting times of London patients not offered choice affected by the choice regime? We examine the evidence on these issues for one specialty, orthopaedics. A difference-in-difference analysis is used to compare waiting times for hospitals within London before and after the introduction of choice. Although there was a small but significant reduction in waiting times in London relative to other areas where there was no patient choice, the main effect of the choice regime was to produce convergence of mean waiting times within London. Convergence was achieved by bringing down waiting times at the hospitals with high waiting times to the levels that prevailed in hospitals with low waiting times. This represented a clear improvement in equity of access, an important objective of the English National Health Service.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Goddard M, Hobden C. Patient choice: a review. Report to the Department of Health. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 2003 Oct
Hurst J, Siciliani L. Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparison of policies in twelve OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2003
Hanning M, Spangberg U. Maximum waiting time: a threat to clinical freedom? Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times. Health Policy 2000; 52(1): 15–32
Brouwer W, van Exel J, Hermans B, et al. Should I stay or should I go? Waiting lists and cross-border care in the Netherlands. Health Policy 2003; 63(3): 289–98
Vrangbaek K, Bech M. County level responses to the introduction of DRG rates for “extended choice” hospital patients in Denmark. Health Policy 2004; 67(1): 25–37
Laghi B, Fagan D. Patients may be treated outside home provinces. The Globe and Mail [Toronto], 2004 Sep 8
Ryan M, McIntosh E, Dean T, et al. Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight. J Public Health Med 2000; 22(2): 202–10
NHS London. London patient choice project [online]. Available from URL: http://www.londonchoice.nhs.uk/ [Accessed 2004 Sep 7]
Department of Health. Hospital waiting times/list statistics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.performance.doh.gov.uk/waitingtimes/index.htm [Accessed 2004 Aug 11]
Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Statistics/HospitalEpisodeStatistics/fs/en [Accessed 2004 Aug 11]
Dawson D, Jacobs R, Martin S, et al. Evaluation of the London Patient Choice Project: system-wide impacts, final report. A report to the London Patient Choice Project. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 2004 Sep
Jacobs R, Martin S. Modelling the response to Choice: waiting times. Centre for Health Economics technical paper no. 33. York: University of York, 2004