Is more competition conducive to the macroeconomic performance in the euro area?

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 38 - Trang 351-380 - 2011
Klaus Weyerstrass1, Johannes Jaenicke2
1Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria
2Faculty of Economics, Law, and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany

Tóm tắt

One of the main goals of the European Union, laid down, inter alia, in the Lisbon Strategy and in the “Europe 2020” Strategy, is to raise employment. One important means of supporting the creation of new jobs is to increase competition. In this paper, it is shown that on average the mark-up, i.e. the deviation of prices from marginal cost in the euro area still exceeds the levels observed in the UK and in the US. After completion of the Single Market Programme in 1993, the mark-up has declined in the euro area and even more in the UK. Nevertheless, there is a strong cross-country variation between Member States, with a particularly high mark-up ratio found for Italy. Panel estimations show that total factor productivity growth, labour productivity growth and the labour market performance in the euro area could be improved by reducing the mark-up. This could be achieved by a proper institutional design. More competition could indeed improve the macroeconomic performance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahn S (2002) Competition, innovation and productivity growth: a review of theory and evidence, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 317 Amable B, Gatti D (2006) Labour and product market reforms: questioning policy complementarity. Ind Corp Change 15:101–122 Badinger H (2007) Has the EU’s single market programme fostered competition? Testing for a decrease in mark-up ratios in EU industries. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69:497–519 Bayoumi T, Laxton D, Pesenti P (2004) Benefits and spillovers of greater competition in Europe: a macroeconomic assessment, NBER Working Paper 10416 Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labour markets. Quart J Econ 118:879–907 Bloch H, Olive M (2001) Pricing over the cycle. Rev Ind Organ 19:99–108 Calmfors L, Driffill J (1988) Centralization of wage bargaining. Econ Policy 2:14–61 Conway P, de Rosa D, Nicoletti G, Steiner F (2006) Regulation, Competition and Productivity Convergence, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 509 Coppens F, Vivet D (2004) Liberalisation of network industries: Is the electricity sector an exception to the rule? National Bank of Belgium, Working Paper 200409 Crafts N (2006) Regulation and productivity performance. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 22:186–202 Estevao M (2004) Why is productivity growth in the Euro area so sluggish? IMF Working Paper WP/04/200 European Commission (2004) The EU Economy: 2004 Review, European Economy No. 6 European Commission (2005) Communication to the spring European council: working together for growth and jobs. A new start for the Lisbon Strategy, Brussels European Commission (2006) Communication to the Spring European Council: Time to move up a gear. The new partnership for growth and jobs, Brussels European Commission (2010) Communication from the Commission: Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels Fiori G, Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S, Schiantarelli F (2007) Employment outcomes and the interaction between product and labour market deregulation: are they substitutes or complements?, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2770 Flaig G, Steiner V (1993) Searching for the “Productivity Slowdown”: some surprising findings from West German manufacturing. Rev Econ Stat 75(1):57–65 Gersbach H (2000) Promoting product market competition to reduce unemployment in Europe, An alternative approach? Kyklos 53:117–134 Griffith R, Harrison R (2004) The link between product market reform and macro-economic performance, European Commission, Economic Papers No. 209 Gwartney J, Lawson R (2009) Economic freedom of the world 2009 annual report. With data set: http://www.freetheworld.com/2009/reports/world/EFWdataset2009.xls Hall RE (1988) The relations between price and marginal cost in US industry. J Polit Econ 96:921–947 Hoj J, Jiminez M, Maher M, Nivoletti G, Wise M (2007) Product market competition in the OECD: taking stock and moving forward, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 275 IMF (2003) Unemployment and labour market institutions: why reforms pay off; April World Economic Outlook Koeniger W, Prat J (2007) Employment protection, product market regulation and firm selection. Econ J 117:302–332 Koszerek D, Havik K, McMorrow K, Röger W, Schönborn F (2007) An overview of the EU KLEMS growth and productivity accounts. European Economoy 290, Brussels Martins JO, Scarpetta S, Pilat D (1996) Mark-up ratios in manufacturing industries. Estimates for 14 OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 162 Nickell S (1996) Competition and Corporate Performance. J Polit Econ 104:724–746 Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S (2003) Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Econ Policy 18(36):9–72 Nicoletti G, Bassanini A, Ernst E, Jean S, Santiago P, Swaim P (2001) Product and labour market interactions in OECD countries, OECD economics Department Working Papers No. 312 Nunziata L (2005) Institutions and wage determination: a multi-country approach. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 67:435–466 Roeger W (1995) Can imperfect competition explain the difference between primal and dual productivity measures? Estimates for US manufacturing. J Polit Econ 103:316–330 Weyerstrass K, Jaenicke J (2008) Spillovers from economic reform. In: Van Aarle B, Weyerstrass K (eds) Economic spillovers, structural reforms and policy coordination in the Euro area. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 129–154 Whinston MD (2007) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 3, pp 2370–2440 Williamson OE (1968) Economies as an antitrust defence: the welfare tradeoffs. Am Econ Rev 58:18–36