Is checklist an effective tool for teaching research students? A survey-based study

BMC Medical Education - Tập 22 - Trang 1-7 - 2022
Abdelrahman M Makram1,2,3, Julia Wang3,4, Gladson Vaghela3,5, Dhir Gala4, Nguyen Khoi Quan3,6, Nguyen Tran Minh Duc7, Atsuko Imoto8, Kazuhiko Moji8,9, Nguyen Tien Huy8,9
1School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
2Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt
3Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/), Nagasaki, Japan
4School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten
5GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar, India
7Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
8School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
9School of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

Tóm tắt

Students face hardships in determining what are the main points that need more studying in every subject. Checklists are one of the ways that can help students identify the most important pieces of information. Accordingly, in this study, we aimed at examining the impact of using educational checklists on the learning process of postgraduate students at Nagasaki University, Japan. Thirty-one Master's students, who finished a “how to write a research protocol” course were recruited by sending them an invitation email that had an attached link to a previously developed and tested questionnaire on the SurveyMonkey® platform. After signing the electronic informed consent, twenty-two participants (response rate = 71%) finished the survey. The data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and expressed in the form of frequencies and percentages. More than half of the students declared that they know the checklist will be used in the course that we investigated. Only two students used checklists as a means of studying (9%). Twelve students (55%) confirmed that no other courses or lessons in the School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health (TMGH) use checklists. No students found the usage of checklists not easy or not practical to apply. Many students thought the length of the checklist was suitable and not too short (64%), although three students (14%) found it lengthy. Moreover, most students described the checklist as beyond good (86%) and they would recommend using a checklist for teaching other college students (73%). Using checklists in education can facilitate the learning process, help in memorization, and deepen the concepts being studied. Further studies are required to examine the impact of checklists in teaching undergraduate students and students from other non-healthcare disciplines.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gawande AA. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. J Nurs Regul. 2011;1:64. Wilson VA, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Improving Achievement and Student Satisfaction through Criteria-Based Evaluation: Checklists and Rubrics in Educational Research Courses. 1999. Nicole Lauzon via LDAOeng: Checklists and Achievement Charts. https://www.ldatschool.ca/checklists-achievement-charts/ (2014). Accessed 23/05/2022. Salinitri FD, Lobkovich AM, Crabtree BL, Wilhelm SM. Reliability and validity of a checklist to evaluate student performance in a problem-based learning group. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(8):6963. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6963. Goodman D, Zagaria AB, Flanagan V, Deselle FS, Hitchings AR, Maloney R, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a checklist and learning collaborative to promote quality and safety in the perinatal care of women with opioid use disorders. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64(1):104–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12943. Davis RL, Zhong Y. The biology of forgetting-A perspective. Neuron. 2017;95(3):490–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.039. Ponds RW, Commissaris KJ, Jolles J. Prevalence and covariates of subjective forgetfulness in a normal population in The Netherlands. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1997;45(3):207–21. https://doi.org/10.2190/MVQ1-WB58-875H-Y4X0. Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(16):4296–301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113. Meinema JG, Buwalda N, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Visser MRM, van Dijk N. Intervention descriptions in medical education: what can be improved? A systematic review and checklist. Acad Med. 2019;94(2):281–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002428. Chia J. Rating scales or checklists for medical school OSCE? A medical student’s perspective. Med Teach. 2020;42(6):711. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1674797. Geeraerts T, Le Guen M. Checklists and cognitive aids in simulation training and daily critical care practice: Simple tools to improve medical performance and patient outcome. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.12.004. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. Hardy JB, Gouin A, Damm C, Compère V, Veber B, Dureuil B. The use of a checklist improves anaesthesiologists’ technical and non-technical performance for simulated malignant hyperthermia management. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.07.009. Ballantine A, Feudtner C. The 10 R’s of clinician education: a checklist. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(4):389–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.33. De La Garza JR, Schmidt MW, Kowalewski KF, Benner L, Muller PC, Kenngott HG, et al. Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1532–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6441-4.