Is There an Additional Value of Using Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2a Immunohistochemistry Compared to Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy Uptake in Predicting Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Response?

Neuroendocrinology - Tập 103 Số 5 - Trang 560-566 - 2016
Roxanne C.S. van Adrichem1, Kimberly Kamp1, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen2, Katharina Biermann2, Richard A. Feelders1, Gaston J H Franssen3, Dik J. Kwekkeboom4, Leo J. Hofland1, Wouter W. de Herder1
1Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Departments of
2Pathology
3Surgery and
4Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> It is unknown whether tumoral somatostatin receptor subtype 2a (sst<sub>2a</sub>) immunohistochemistry (IHC) has additional value compared to somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) uptake using OctreoScan® in predicting response to peptide receptor radiotherapy using <sup>177</sup>Lu-octreotate (PRRT) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The aims of this study were: (1) to establish the percentage of sst<sub>2a</sub> immunopositivity in GEP-NET samples of PRRT-treated patients, (2) to determine the relationship between best GEP-NET response using RECIST 1.0 criteria 1 year after PRRT and tumoral sst<sub>2a</sub> IHC, and (3) to compare characteristics of patients with sst<sub>2a</sub> IHC-negative and -positive tumors. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All 73 consecutive patients were selected for PRRT based on a positive SRS. Radiological response was scored according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. sst<sub>2a</sub> status was detected on tumor samples by IHC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 93% of GEP-NET samples showed sst<sub>2a</sub> IHC positivity. No statistically significant relationship was observed between in vitro sst<sub>2a</sub> expression and in vivo best GEP-NET response 1 year after PRRT (p = 0.47). Sex, primary tumor site, disease stage, ENETS TNM classification, Ki-67 index, highest serum chromogranin-A level, and highest neuron-specific enolase level were not significantly different between patients with negative and positive sst<sub>2a</sub> tumoral IHC with the exception of age at diagnosis (p = 0.007). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> sst<sub>2a</sub> IHC of tumor samples has no additional value compared to SRS uptake using OctreoScan® in predicting tumor response after PRRT.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00428-002-0609-x

10.1097/00019606-200003000-00008

10.1210/jcem.85.10.6864

10.1007/s002590100541

10.1700/989.10722

10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8585

10.1200/JCO.2010.33.7873

10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2553

10.1159/000225951

10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7431

10.1007/s00259-011-1846-5

10.1055/s-0030-1253354

10.1007/s00428-006-0250-1

10.1007/s00428-007-0452-1

10.1007/s10549-007-9746-x

10.1093/jnci/92.3.205

10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.181

10.1038/bjc.2013.682

10.1007/s004280100494

10.1038/modpathol.3800954

10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01175.x

10.1530/ERC-12-0169

10.1007/s00259-013-2402-2

10.1111/cen.12775

10.1159/000179899

10.1530/ERC-10-0282

10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02583.x

10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181feedab

10.1007/s00259-002-0939-6

10.4103/1450-1147.136699

10.1007/s002590050034