Investing in Skews

Emerald - Tập 2 Số 1 - Trang 10-18 - 2000
DILIP B.MADAN1, GAVIN S.MCPHAIL2
1Professor of finance at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland.
2Student at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland.

Tóm tắt

Asset allocation has primarily focused its attention on attaining mean variance efficiency by employing diversification strategies following the portfolio selection methodologies of Markowitz[1952]. These are important principles that have given rise to a large variety of diversified investment choices in mutual funds that now outnumber the available choices for investment in stocks. Paralleling this development has been a growing interest in the second odd moment describing returns, the level of skewness. The empirical stability of return skewness has been noted in Beedles and Simkowitz[1980]. Earlier, the importance of skewness for portfolio selection was studied by Arditi and Levy[1975] and Kraus and Litzenberger[1976]. More recently, motivated by the persistence skews observed in option markets (Bates[1991]), Bakshi Kapadia, and Madan [2000] take up the issue of studying the links between the statistical and risk neutral skews, while Harvey and Siddique[1999] address the asset pricing implications of investor preferences for skewness. Evidence is also presented by Carr, Geman, Madan, and Yor [2000] that the primary model for diversified returns is that of a pure jump return process reflecting both, excess kurtosis and skewness.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arditti F., 1975, The Journal of Finance, 30, 797

Bakshi G., 2000, Working paper

Bates D., 1991, The Journal of Finance, 46, 1009, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03775.x

Beedles W., 1980, TheJournal ofBusiness Research, 8, 457

Carr P., 2000, Working paper

Harvey C., 1999, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34, 465, 10.2307/2676230

Hodges S., 1998, A Generalization of the Sharpe Ratio and its Applications to Valuation Bounds and Risk Measures

Kraus A., 1983, ThejournalofFinance, 31, 1085

Madan D., 1998, European Finance Review, 2, 79, 10.1023/A:1009703431535

Madan D., 1991, Mathematical Finance, 1, 39, 10.1111/j.1467-9965.1991.tb00018.x

Madan D., 1990, Journal of Business, 63, 511, 10.1086/296519

McCulloch J.H., 1978, Journal of Business, 51, 601, 10.1086/296024

Markowitz H., 1952, The Journal ofFinance, 12, 77

Sharpe W., 1963, Management Science, 9, 277, 10.1287/mnsc.9.2.277