Investigation of Ecosystem Services and Circular Economy Interactions under an Inter-organizational Framework
Tóm tắt
Nowadays, the conceptualization of circular economy is an attractive managerial tool among governments and businesses throughout the word, while ecosystem services are a contentious issue due to the particular needs of humans’ well-being. At this review the interactions between the principles of ecosystem services and the circular economy were investigated in the light of inter-organizational systems. This evaluation was based on more and more complex processes, while the integration of the growing circular economy concept within the shrinking parent ecosystem unveiled challenges and constraints for products’ end of life and quality. It was argued that: (a) The existence of social and people-related barriers can be considered under three groups, namely, the “sustainable provision and modeling schemes”, “socio-cultural appreciation and payment schemes”, and “regulatory and maintenance schemes”, (b) The impacts of circular economy—ecosystem services toward an inter-organizational functional stream model associated with distinguished proactive and post treatment risk values (c) The functionality and the accountability of the technosphere are the two critical components to support the restorative and the regenerative perspectives of the biosphere. The aforementioned findings unveiled new emerging paths to be further investigated, offering a deeper appraisal of circular economy under the inter-organizational perception.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Geng, 2008, Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 15, 231, 10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6
Macarthur E. Foundation (2019, March 23). Towards the Circular Economy. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf/.
Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
Ness, 2008, Sustainable urban infrastructure in China: Towards a factor 10 improvement in resource productivity through integrated infrastructure system, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 15, 288
Rios, 2017, Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: The changing role of design, J. Clean. Prod., 160, 109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130
Schiller, 2017, Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: Metabolic evidence for a circular economy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 123, 93, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.007
Rem, 2017, Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 122, 163, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.009
Fischer, 2017, Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry, J. Clean. Prod., 155, 17, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.038
Noya, 2017, Environmental assessment of the entire pork value chain in Catalonia—A strategy to work towards Circular Economy, Sci. Total Environ., 589, 122, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.186
Shi, 2012, China’s Quest for Eco-industrial Parks, Part I, J. Ind. Ecol., 16, 8, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00454.x
Park, 2016, A review of the National Eco-Industrial Park Development Program in Korea: Progress and achievements in the first phase, 2005–2010, J. Clean. Prod., 114, 33, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.115
Genovese, 2017, Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications, Omega, 66, 344, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
Zeng, 2017, Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms, J. Clean. Prod., 155, 54, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.093
Dong, 2013, Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: A hybrid life cycle assessment approach, Environ. Policy, 57, 298
Ghisellini, 2017, A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, J. Clean. Prod., 114, 11, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Gerner, 2018, Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project, Ecosyst. Serv., 30, 327, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.020
Livingstone, 2018, Ecological engagement determines ecosystem service valuation: A case study from Rouge National Urban Park in Toronto, Canada, Ecosyst. Serv., 30, 86, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.006
Tolessa, 2016, Land use/land cover analysis and ecosystem services valuation in the central highlands of Ethiopia, For. Trees Livelihoods, 26, 111, 10.1080/14728028.2016.1221780
Schaubroeck, 2016, Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios; a case study of a Scots pine forest, J. Environ. Manag., 173, 79, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.005
Colombo, 2013, What are the consequences of ignoring attributes in choice experiments? Implications for ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Econ., 96, 25, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.016
Carollo, 2012, Gulf of Mexico Ecosystem Service Valuation Database (GecoServ): Gathering ecosystem services valuation studies to promote their inclusion in the decision-making process, Mar. Policy, 36, 214, 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.006
Villa, 2002, Designing an integrated knowledge base to support ecosystem services valuation, Ecol. Econ., 41, 445, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00093-9
Sutton, 2003, An Empirical Environmental Sustainability Index Derived Solely from Nighttime Satellite Imagery and Ecosystem Service Valuation, J. Popul. Behav. Soc. Environ. Issues, 24, 293, 10.1023/A:1022412304827
Zong, 2006, Research advance in ecosystem services valuation, Chin. J. Ecol., 25, 212
Lienhoop, 2016, Preference Refinement in Deliberative Choice Experiments for Ecosystem Service Valuation, Land Econ., 92, 555, 10.3368/le.92.3.555
Richardson, 2015, The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Econ., 115, 51, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018
Sarkki, 2015, Ecosystem service valuation in a governance debate: Practitioners’ strategic argumentation on forestry in northern Finland, Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 13, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.09.003
Sinha, 2015, Ecosystem services valuation for enhancing conservation and livelihoods in a sacred landscape of the Indian Himalayas, Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Serv. Manag., 11, 156
Whitham, C.E.L., Shi, K., and Riordan, P. (2015). Ecosystem Service Valuation Assessments for Protected Area Management: A Case Study Comparing Methods Using Different Land Cover Classification and Valuation Approaches. PLoS ONE, 10.
Gowdy, 2013, The parable of the bees: Beyond proximate causes in ecosystem service valuation, Environ. Ethics, 35, 41, 10.5840/enviroethics20133515
Miller, R., Nielsen, E., and Huang, C.-H. (2017). Ecosystem Service Valuation through Wildfire Risk Mitigation: Design, Governance, and Outcomes of the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP). Forests, 8.
Zhang, 2017, A consistent ecosystem services valuation method based on Total Economic Value and Equivalent Value Factors: A case study in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China, Ecol. Complex., 29, 40, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.12.008
Hackbart, 2017, Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?, Ecosyst. Serv., 23, 218, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.010
Brazner, 2016, Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies: Using social metrics as an alternative to ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Econ., 126, 58, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.002
Li, 2016, Removing double counting in wetland ecosystem services valuation based on emergy algebra, Chin. J. Ecol., 35, 1108
Li, 2015, Prioritizing protection measures through ecosystem services valuation for the Napahai Wetland, Shangri-La County, Yunnan Province, China, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 22, 142, 10.1080/13504509.2014.926298
Vo, 2015, How remote sensing supports mangrove ecosystem service valuation: A case study in Ca Mau province, Vietnam, Ecosyst. Serv., 14, 67, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.007
Brooks, 2014, Effects of methodology and stakeholder disaggregation on ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Soc., 19, 18, 10.5751/ES-06811-190318
Chen, 2014, Review of Wetland Ecosystem Services Valuation in China, Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 6, 1277, 10.19026/ajfst.6.196
Comello, 2014, Firm-level ecosystem service valuation using mechanistic biogeochemical modeling and functional substitutability, Ecol. Econ., 100, 63, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.014
Li, 2014, How important are the wetlands in the middle-lower Yangtze River region: An ecosystem service valuation approach, Ecosyst. Serv., 10, 54, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.004
Pang, 2014, Evaluation of ecosystem services valuation of alpine wetlands in Zoigê Plateau, Wetl. Sci., 12, 273
Chen, 2007, Ecosystem services valuation of Sanchahe Wetland in Bengbu City, Wetl. Sci., 5, 334
Oleson, 2018, Charting progress towards system-scale ecosystem service valuation in islands, Environ. Conserv., 45, 212, 10.1017/S0376892918000140
Toledo, 2018, Ecosystem service valuation framework applied to a legal case in the Anchicaya region of Colombia, Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 352, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.022
Anderson, 2017, Ecosystem service valuations of South Africa using a variety of land cover data sources and resolutions, Ecosyst. Serv., 27, 173, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.001
Mavrommati, 2017, A novel deliberative multicriteria evaluation approach to ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Soc., 22, 39, 10.5751/ES-09105-220239
Sangha, 2017, Towards an Indigenous Ecosystem Services Valuation Framework: A North Australian Example, Conserv. Soc., 15, 255, 10.4103/cs.cs_16_156
Landon, 2017, Incorporating Sociocultural Phenomena into Ecosystem-Service Valuation: The Importance of Critical Pluralism, BioScience, 67, 233, 10.1093/biosci/biw170
Calvet-Mir, L., March, H., Corbacho-Monné, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., and Reyes-García, V. (2016). Home Garden Ecosystem Services Valuation through a Gender Lens: A Case Study in the Catalan Pyrenees. Sustainability, 8.
Preece, 2016, Ecosystem service valuation reinforces world class value of Cape York Peninsula’s ecosystems but environment and indigenous people lose out, Ecosyst. Serv., 18, 154, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.001
Bennett, 2016, Ecosystem Services Valuation as an Opportunity for Inquiry Learning, J. Geosci. Educ., 64, 175, 10.5408/15-138.1
Scholte, 2015, Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods, Ecol. Econ., 114, 67, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Evans, 2014, Relationships between anthropogenic pressures and ecosystem functions in UK blanket bogs: Linking process understanding to ecosystem service valuation, Ecosyst. Serv., 9, 5, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.013
Fanny, 2014, How (not) to perform ecosystem service valuations: Pricing gorillas in the mist, Biodivers. Conserv., 24, 187, 10.1007/s10531-014-0796-1
Mukherjee, N., Sutherland, W.J., Dicks, L., Hugé, J., Koedam, N., and Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2014). Ecosystem Service Valuations of Mangrove Ecosystems to Inform Decision Making and Future Valuation Exercises. PLoS ONE, 9.
Johnson, 2012, Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: An agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin, Ecol. Econ., 79, 71, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.020
Liu, 2012, An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China, Ecol. Model., 225, 127, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.017
Reyers, 2011, The possibilities and pitfalls presented by a pragmatic approach to ecosystem service valuation in an arid biodiversity hotspot, J. Environ., 75, 612
Idowu, S.O., and Schmidpeter, R. (2015). The Sustainable Provision of Environmental Services: From Regulation to Innovation, Springer.
Lopez, 2008, Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: The meaning of the numbers, Conserv. Biol., 22, 624, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00921.x
Kirchherr, 2017, Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Res. Conserv. Recycl., 127, 221, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Elia, 2017, Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 2741, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196
Figge, 2016, Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance, J. Clean. Prod., 133, 589, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023
Pomponi, 2017, Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 710, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055
Cook, 2014, Fluid transitions to more sustainable product service systems, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 12, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.003
Vezzoli, 2015, New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product–Service Systems’, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.061
Salazar, 2015, Eco-designing Product Service Systems by degrading functions while maintaining user satisfaction, J. Clean. Prod., 87, 452, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.031
Reim, 2015, Product-Service Systems (PSS) and business models. 71. Tactics—A systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 61, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.003
Korhonen, 2018, Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
Witjes, 2016, Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 112, 37, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015
Broadbent, 2016, Steel’s recyclability: Demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 21, 1658, 10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1
Govindan, 2017, A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: A Journal of Cleaner Production focus, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 371, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126
Liu, C., and Côté, R. (2017). A Framework for Integrating Ecosystem Services into China’s Circular Economy: The Case of Eco-Industrial Parks. Sustainability, 9.
Joyce, 2016, The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models, J. Clean. Prod., 135, 1474, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
Masi, 2018, The role of constructed wetlands in a new circular economy, resource oriented, and ecosystem services paradigm, J. Environ. Manag., 216, 275, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.086
Milsum, 1968, The technosphere, the biosphere, the sociosphere Their systems modeling and optimization, IEEE Spectr., 5, 76, 10.1109/MSPEC.1968.5214690
Nelson, 1984, The Institute of Ecotechnics: An institute devoted to developing the discipline of relating technosphere to biosphere, Environmentalist, 4, 205
Bousquet, A. (2015). Prolegomena to postanthropocentric international relations: Biosphere and technosphere in the age of global complexity. World Politics at the Edge of Chaos: Reflections on Complexity and Global Life, SUNY Press. Chapter 7.
Rugani, 2018, Human-nature nexuses: Broadening knowledge on integrated biosphere-technosphere modelling to advance the assessment of ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 30, 193, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.002
Van Buren, N., Demmers, M., Van Der Heijden, R., and Witlox, F. (2016). Towards a Circular Economy: The Role of Dutch Logistics Industries and Governments. Sustainability, 8.
Ruggieri, A., Braccini, A.M., Poponi, S., and Mosconi, E.M. (2016). A Meta-Model of Inter-Organisational Cooperation for the Transition to a Circular Economy. Sustainability, 8.
Singh, 2016, Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: Important lessons for the upcoming circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 342, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020
Khor, 2012, Impact of reverse logistics product disposition towards business performance in Malaysian E&E companies, J. Supply Chain Cust. Relatsh. Manag., 2012, 699469
Mitchell, 2016, Dedicated Energy Crops and Crop Residues for Bioenergy Feedstocks in the Central and Eastern USA, BioEnergy Res., 9, 384, 10.1007/s12155-016-9734-2
Zhang, L., Qu, L., and Gao, Y. (2014, January 24–26). Ecosystem services valuation with a socio-economic perspective: Case from Hubei, China. Proceedings of the Environmental Protection and Sustainable Ecological Development (EPSED 2014), Wuhan, China.
Dupras, 2016, Using ecosystem services valuation to measure the economic impacts of land-use changes on the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme, 1850–2010), Reg. Environ. Chang., 16, 1075, 10.1007/s10113-015-0847-5
Lawrance, 1991, Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data, J. Political Econ., 99, 54, 10.1086/261740
Pindyck, 2007, Uncertainty in Environmental Economics, Environ. Econ. Policy, 1, 45, 10.1093/reep/rem002
Pindyck, 2012, Uncertain outcomes and climate change policy, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 63, 289, 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.12.001
Reynolds, D.B. (2018). Carbon Regulations: Can Economic Science Determine Carbon Costs?, International Association of Energy Economics (IAEE) Energy Forum.