Investigating variation in learning processes in a FutureLearn MOOC

Baker, R., Evans, B., & Dee, T. (2016). A randomized experiment testing the efficacy of a scheduling nudge in a massive open online course (MOOC). AERA Open,2(4), 2332858416674007.

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 .

Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning,9(2), 161–185.

Bogarín, A., Cerezo, R., & Romero, C. (2018). A survey on educational process mining. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,8(1), e1230.

Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world (Vol. 4). Berlin: Springer.

Cross, S., & Conole, G. (2009). Learn about learning design. Part of the OU Learn about series of guides. The Open University: Milton Keynes. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/OULDI/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Learn-about-learning-design_v7.doc .

Cross, S., Galley, R., Brasher, A., & Weller, M. (2012). OULDI-JISC project evaluation report: The impact of new curriculum design tools and approaches on institutional process and design cultures.

Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2016). Gauging MOOC learners’ adherence to the designed learning path. In 9th international conference on EDM.

Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R. F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2017). Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 454–463). ACM.

Davis, D., Seaton, D., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018). Toward large-scale learning design.

Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 51–58). ACM.

Geigle, C., & Zhai, C. (2017). Modeling MOOC student behavior with two-layer hidden Markov models. In Proceedings of the fourth (2017) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 205–208). ACM.

Günther, C. W., & Van Der Aalst, W. M. (2007). Fuzzy mining—Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In International conference on business process management (pp. 328–343). Berlin: Springer.

Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning@ scale conference (pp. 21–30). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2566247 .

Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). An alternative approach for measuring MOOC success based on participant’s intentions.

Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October–December 2014. EADTU.

Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., et al. (2017). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research,88, 43–86.

Juhaňák, L., Zounek, J., & Rohlíková, L. (2017). Using process mining to analyze students’ quiz-taking behavior patterns in a learning management system. Computers in Human Behavior,92, 496–506.

Kizilcec, R. F., Davis, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Towards equal opportunities in MOOCs: affirmation reduces gender & social-class achievement gaps in China. In Proceedings of the fourth (2017) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 121–130). ACM.

Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179). ACM.

Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 6.

Li, Q., & Baker, R. (2018). The different relationships between engagement and outcomes across participant subgroups in massive open online courses. Computers & Education,127, 41–65.

Liu, Z., Brown, R., Lynch, C., Barnes, T., Baker, R. S., Bergner, Y., et al. (2016). MOOC learner behaviors by country and culture; an exploratory analysis. EDM,16, 127–134.

Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in massive open online courses. Computers in Human Behavior,80, 179–196.

Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2018). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673 .

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education,80, 77–83.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,18(2), 92–102.

Morgado, L., Mota, J., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Tomasini, A., Silva, A., Fueyo Gutiérrez, A., Giannatelli, A., Brouns, F. (2014). ECO D2. 2 Instructional design and scenarios for MOOCs version 1.

Nguyen, Q. (2017). Unravelling the dynamics of learning design within and between disciplines in higher education using learning analytics.

Nguyen, Q., Huptych, M., & Rienties, B. (2018). Linking students’ timing of engagement to learning design and academic performance. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 141–150). ACM.

Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2017). Mixing and matching learning design and learning analytics. In International conference on learning and collaboration technologies (pp. 302–316). Berlin: Springer.

Papamitsiou, Z. K., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning Analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society,17(4), 49–64.

Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology,6(4), 262.

Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333–341.

Rizvi, S., & Ghani, S. (2016). Predicting higher education MOOCs engagement-level odds; a stochastic approach. In Presented at the society for research in higher education international annual research conference (SRHE-16). Newport, United Kingdom.

Rizvi, S., Rienties, B., & Khoja, S. A. (2019). The role of demographics in online learning; A decision tree based approach. Computers & Education, 137, 32–47.

Rizvi, S., Rienties, B., & Rogaten, J. (2018). Temporal dynamics of MOOC learning trajectories. In Proceedings of the international conference on data science, E-learning and information systems. DATA’18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279996.3280035 .

Robinson, C., Yeomans, M., Reich, J., Hulleman, C., & Gehlbach, H. (2016). Forecasting student achievement in MOOCs with natural language processing. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 383–387). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2883932 .

Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,3(1), 12–27.

Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology,40(1), 64–82.

Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Educational design for MOOCs: Design considerations for technology-supported learning at large scale. In Open education: From OERs to MOOCs (pp. 39–71). Berlin: Springer.

Shah, D. (2016). Monetization over massiveness: Breaking down MOOCs by the numbers in 2016. EdSurge. https://www.Edsurge.Com/ . Accessed July 25, 2017.

Sharples, M. (2015). FutureLearn learning design guidelines.

Slater, S., Joksimović, S., Kovanovic, V., Baker, R. S., & Gasevic, D. (2017). Tools for educational data mining: A review. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,42(1), 85–106.

Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics,2(1), 72–100.

Sparke, M. (2017). Situated cyborg knowledge in not so borderless online global education: Mapping the geosocial landscape of a MOOC. Geopolitics,22(1), 51–72.

Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forums affect learning gains. International Educational Data Mining Society.

Wen, M., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Identifying latent study habits by mining learner behavior patterns in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 1983–1986). ACM.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1), 68–81.

Winne, P. H. (2017). Leveraging big data to help each learner and accelerate learning science. Teachers College Record,119(3), 1–24.