Investigating Complexity to Assess Student Learning from a Robotics-Based Task

Adolphson, K. (2005). Robotics as a context for meaningful mathematics. In G. Lloyd, M. Wilson, J. Wilkins & S. Behm (Eds) (2005), Proceedings of the PME-NA 27 Conference (pp. 402–409). Roanoke, VA: PME-NA. (http://www.pmena.org/pmenaproceedings/PMENA%2027%202005%20Proceedings.pdf). Apiola, M., & Tedre, M. (2013). Deepening learning through learning-by-inventing. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, 12, 185–202. Barrell, B. (2001). Problem-based learning: An inquiry approach (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. Benitti, F. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. Blanchard, S. (2009). Teaching and learning for the net generation: A robotic-based learning approach? In B. Sriraman, V. Freiman, & N. Lirette-Pitre (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, creativity, and learning: Mathematics with literature, paradoxes, history, technology, and modeling (pp. 217–231). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., & Lirette-Pitre, N. (2010). Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2851–2857. Chambers, J., & Carbonaro, M. (2003). Designing, developing, and implementing a course on LEGO robotics for technology teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 209–241. Clements, D., & Meredith, J. (1993). Research on logo: effects and efficacy. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 4(4), 263–290. Dörner, D. (1986). Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz [Assessment of operative intelligence]. Diagnostica, 32(4), 290–308. Fischer, A., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1), 19–41. Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacogntion, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–30). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Freiman, V., Blanchard, S., Lirette-Pitre, N. (2010). Perceptions of middle school children about mathematical connections in a robotic-based learning task. In A. Araújo, A. Fernandes, A. Azevedo & J. Rodrigues (Eds), Proceedings of the 2010 Educational Interfaces between Mathematics and Industry Conference (pp. 199–209). Lisbon, PT: Centro Internacional de Matemática. (http://www.fi.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/2010_eimi_proceedings.pdf). Goodwin, K., & Highfield, K. (2013). A framework for examining technologies and early mathematics learning. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualising early mathematics learning (pp. 205–226). New York: Springer. Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 81–102). New York: Springer. Government of Canada (2010). Building digital skills for tomorrow. (http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/028.nsf/eng/00041.html). Guilbert, L. (1999). La relation cognitivo-affective de la pensée critique: Vers un modèle d’évaluation? In L. Guilbert, J. Boisvert, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Enseigner et comprendre: Le développement d'une pensée critique (pp. 80–98). Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. Gura, M. (2007). Student robotics: A model for “21st century learning”. In M. Gura & K. King (Eds.), Classroom robotics: Case stories of 21st century instruction for millennial students (pp. 11–31). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Holmquist, S. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning and attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida (http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5043). Holtman, L., Julie, C., Mbekwa, M., Mtetwa, D., & Ngcobo, M. (2011). A comparison of preferences for real-life situations that could be used in school mathematics in three SADC countries. Southern African Review of Education, 17, 120–137. Howland, J., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Boston: Pearson Education. Karim, M., Lemaignan, S., Mondada, F. (2015). A review: Can robots reshape K–12 STEM education? In Proceedings of the 2015 I.E. International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social impacts. (http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/209219/files/2015_ehsan_CanRobotsReshapeStemEducation.pdf). Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. (1999). Innovative tasks to improve critical—and creative-thinking skills. In L. Stiff & F. Curcio (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K–12 (pp. 138–145). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. Mackrell, K. (2015). Feedback and formative assessment with Cabri. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME9 (pp. 2517–2523). Prague: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education and ERME. Matson, E., DeLoach, S., & Pauly, R. (2004). Building interest in math and science for rural and underserved elementary school students using robots. Journal of STEM Education Innovations and Research, 5(3), 35–46. MÉNB. (2007). Les enfants au premier plan. Fredericton: Ministère de l’Éducation du Nouveau-Brunswick. Moundridou, M., & Kalinoglou, A. (2008). Using LEGO Mindstorms as an instructional aid in technical and vocational secondary education: Experiences from an empirical case study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5192, 312–321. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2001). Modeling with purpose: Mathematics as a critical tool. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 295–311). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Olive, J., & Makar, K. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 133–178). New York: Springer. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2001). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Perrenoud, P. (2002). D’une métaphore à l’autre: Transférer ou mobiliser ses connaissances? In J. Dolz & E. Ollagnier (Eds.), L’énigme de la compétence en éducation (pp. 45–60). Brussels: De Boeck. Petre, M., & Price, B. (2004). Using robotics to motivate ‘back door’ learning. Education and Information Technologies, 9(2), 147–158. Porter, G. & AuCoin, A. (2012). Strengthening inclusion, strengthening schools. (Report of the review of inclusive education programs and practices in New Brunswick schools: An action plan for growth). Fredericton, NB: Government of New Brunswick. (http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/ed/pdf/K12/Inclusion/Inclusion.pdf). Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Ricca, B., Lulis, E., Bade, D. (2006). LEGO Mindstorms and the growth of critical thinking. (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.499.7535&rep=rep1&type=pdf). Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 17–28. Savard, A. (2008). Le développement d’une pensée critique envers les jeux de hasard et d’argent par l’enseignement des probabilités à l’école primaire: Vers une prise de décision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Québec, QC: Université Laval. Savard, A., & Highfield, K. (2015). Teachers’ talk about robotics: Where is the mathematics? In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 540–546). Sunshine Coast: MERGA. Savoie-Zajac, L. (2004). La recherche qualitative/interprétative en éducation. In T. Karsenti & L. Savoie-Zajac (Eds.), La recherche en éducation: Étapes et approches (pp. 142–150). Sherbrooke: Éditions du CRP. Stine, D. & Matthews, C. (2009). The US Science and Technology Workforce. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. (https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34539.pdf). Swartz, R., & Perkins, D. (1990). Teaching thinking: Issues and approaches. Pacific Grove: Midwest Publications. Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment—summative and formative: some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3015–3022. ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. Venturini, M. (2015). How teachers think about the role of digital technologies in student assessment in mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bologna, IT: Università di Bologna/Simon Fraser University. Yelland, N. (1994). The strategies and interactions of young children in LOGO tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 10(1), 33–49.