Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover?

Ecology Letters - Tập 10 Số 1 - Trang 77-94 - 2007
Brett A. Melbourne1, Howard V. Cornell1, Kendi F. Davies1, Christopher J. Dugaw2, Sarah C. Elmendorf1, Amy L. Freestone3, Richard J. Hall4, Susan Harrison1, Alan Hastings1, Matt Holland1, Marcel Holyoak1, John Lambrinos5, Kara A. Moore1, Hiroyuki Yokomizo6
1Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
2Department of Mathematics, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
3Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA
4Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Systematique et Evolution, Universite Paris Sud, Orsay Cedex 91405, France
5Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
6Faculty of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-7, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan

Tóm tắt

AbstractWe review and synthesize recent developments in the study of the invasion of communities in heterogeneous environments, considering both the invasibility of the community and impacts to the community. We consider both empirical and theoretical studies. For each of three major kinds of environmental heterogeneity (temporal, spatial and invader‐driven), we find evidence that heterogeneity is critical to the invasibility of the community, the rate of spread, and the impacts on the community following invasion. We propose an environmental heterogeneity hypothesis of invasions, whereby heterogeneity both increases invasion success and reduces the impact to native species in the community, because it promotes invasion and coexistence mechanisms that are not possible in homogeneous environments. This hypothesis could help to explain recent findings that diversity is often increased as a result of biological invasions. It could also explain the scale dependence of the diversity–invasibility relationship. Despite the undoubted importance of heterogeneity to the invasion of communities, it has been studied remarkably little and new research is needed that simultaneously considers invasion, environmental heterogeneity and community characteristics. As a young field, there is an unrivalled opportunity for theoreticians and experimenters to work together to build a tractable theory informed by data.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x

10.1098/rspb.2004.2696

10.1086/283553

Bartha S., 2003, Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession, Appl. Veg. Sci., 6, 205, 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00581.x

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01207.x

10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00090-X

10.1086/303199

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13099.x

10.2307/2265501

10.1890/02-3131

10.1073/pnas.87.24.9610

10.3354/meps268119

10.7208/chicago/9780226101811.001.0001

10.1086/324112

10.1006/tpbi.1994.1013

10.1006/tpbi.2000.1486

10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00095-9

Chesson P., 2005, Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, 279

10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.003

10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0211:EEAEGI]2.0.CO;2

10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970201.x

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.010

10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431

10.1890/04-1196

10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0481:BGDCFI]2.0.CO;2

10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x

10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04205.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00546.x

Elton C.S., 1958, The Ecology of Invasions

10.1890/03-3165

10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.005

10.2307/3546200

Gurney W.S.C., 1998, Ecological Dynamics

10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00092-3

10.1007/s004420050910

10.1016/0040-5809(80)90059-3

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01993-5

10.1086/285705

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1610:ROAFIG]2.0.CO;2

Holyoak M., 2005, Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities

10.1006/bulm.1997.0008

Hubbell S.P., 2001, The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00660.x

10.1890/03-0245

10.1086/318633

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13639.x

10.1073/pnas.85.19.7418

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x

10.1126/science.288.5467.852

10.1086/422859

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01286-X

10.1007/BF00328732

Melbourne B.A., 2005, Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, 307

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0898:EOCSOI]2.0.CO;2

10.1086/338996

10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14582.x

10.1098/rspb.1989.0070

10.1006/bulm.2001.0239

10.1023/A:1010034312781

10.1007/s10530-005-6419-8

10.1890/03-0266

10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50002-3

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037

10.1073/pnas.0437913100

10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00224-6

10.1073/pnas.1835728100

10.1890/03-0841

10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00600.x

Shigesada N., 1997, Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, 10.1093/oso/9780198548522.001.0001

10.1023/A:1010086329619

10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.196

10.1086/424969

10.1126/science.286.5444.1577

10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0025:EPSIHS]2.0.CO;2

Tilman D., 1982, Resource Competition and Community Structure

10.2307/1939377

10.1073/pnas.0403458101

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614

10.1016/0006-3207(87)90089-9

10.1007/s002850200145

10.3354/meps289109

Woodward G., 2001, Invasion of a stream food web by a new top predator, J. Anim. Ecol., 70, 273, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2001.00497.x

10.1890/02-8018

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12654.x