Introducing surprising events can stimulate deep learning in a serious game

British Journal of Educational Technology - Tập 44 Số 1 - Trang 156-169 - 2013
Erik D. van der Spek1, Herre van Oostendorp1, John‐Jules Ch. Meyer2
1Department of Information and Computing Sciences of Utrecht University
2Department of Information and Computing Sciences at the Faculty of Science of Utrecht University

Tóm tắt

AbstractSerious games show great potential, but many fail to live up to that potential. One way to improve serious game design could be to introduce surprising events linked to the instructional material. We modified our serious game for triage training, called Code Red Triage, to include three surprising events pertaining to decision‐making moments in the triage procedure. Forty‐one participants were divided into two groups: one group played a version of the game with the surprising events, and the other group played a control version of the game. A pre‐posttest design showed no significant difference in engagement and surface learning, but did show the participants in the surprising events condition obtained significantly superior knowledge structures, indicating that surprising events in a serious game foster deeper learning.Practitioner NotesWhat is already known about this topic (Very little.) That serious games often fail to reach their potential. That a surprising event can lead to a better comprehension of text. But that a narrative background in a virtual learning environment led to worse learning. What this paper adds A thorough, single‐blind, controlled empirical experiment on the effects of serious game design on different factors of learning and engagement. That introducing small surprising events in a serious game leads to improved deep comprehension of the instructional material. That this intervention has no ostensible effect on engagement. Implications for practice and/or policy Surprising events should be introduced in a serious game to improve learning. Serious game designers should therefore carefully consider how to embed instruction in the game narrative. Research in serious game design is worthwhile (and highly needed) because it can lead to better serious games.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/01638530802629125

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7

Day E. A., 2001, Structural knowledge assessment: comparison of referent structures, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 1022

10.3102/00346543068002179

Graesser A., 2009, Serious games: mechanisms and effects, 83

Half Life 2: Episode Two(Version 2009) [Computer software]. Bellevue WA:Valve Corporation.

10.1080/15031430310013429

10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00021-2

10.1007/s11251-008-9073-6

Jenkins H., 2004, First person: new media as story, performance, game, 118

10.1016/0304-422X(80)90013-3

10.1162/105474601300343612

10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.001

10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Pathfinder(Version 6.3) [Computer software]. Las Cruces NM:Interlink Inc.

Prensky M., 2007, Digital game‐based learning

10.1038/nrn1052

Schvaneveldt R. W., 1985, Pathfinder: scaling with network structures (Memorandum in Computer and Cognitive Science, MCCS‐85‐9, Computing Research Laboratory)

Trumpower D. L., 2010, Specificity of structural assessment of knowledge, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8, 1

10.1109/VS-GAMES.2010.8

10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01021.x

Van Oostendorp H., 1999, The construction of mental representations during reading, 319

10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.001

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

British Journal of Educational Technology

Tập 44 Số 1

156-169

Thông tin tác giả