Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief after Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Journal of International Medical Research - Tập 39 Số 2 - Trang 435-445 - 2011
Hyun Kang1, B-G Kim2
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Tóm tắt

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine to reduce post-operative pain in 64 inguinal herniorrhaphy patients. Intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg per h was randomly assigned to 32 patients (lidocaine group) and intravenous normal saline bolus injection followed by infusion of normal saline was assigned to 32 other patients (control group). Visual analogue scale pain scores, fentanyl consumption and the frequency at which analgesia was administered from a patient-controlled analgesia device (measured by number of button pushes) were significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the control group until 12 h after surgery. Total fentanyl consumption (patient-controlled plus investigator-controlled rescue administration) and the total number of button pushes were significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the control group. It is concluded that intravenous lidocaine injection reduced post-operative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy, is easy to administer and may have potential to become routine practice for this type of surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/00000539-200112000-00001

10.1097/00000542-199711000-00027

Pavlin DJ, 1998, Anesth Analg, 87, 816, 10.1213/00000539-199810000-00014

Chung F, 1995, Anesth Analg, 80, 896

10.1097/00003643-200105000-00006

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb12956.x

10.1097/01.sla.0000217691.81562.7e

10.1213/01.ANE.0000068881.01031.09

10.1213/00000539-199001000-00006

10.1097/00000542-200701000-00007

Groudine SB, 1998, Anesth Analg, 86, 235, 10.1213/00000539-199802000-00003

10.1097/00129689-200208000-00008

10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038

10.1007/BF03012017

10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656

10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00268-7

10.1097/00000542-200009000-00038

Edwards AD, 1999, J Intraven Nurs, 22, 273

10.1093/bja/54.5.501

10.1016/0304-3959(87)91061-X

10.1002/bjs.6375

10.2165/10898560-000000000-00000

10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00233-6

10.1097/00000542-200001000-00017

10.1093/brain/awg060

10.1016/0014-2999(80)90529-4

10.1038/sj.bjp.0705107

10.1097/00000542-200107000-00021

10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817b5a9b

10.1016/S1053-0770(05)80138-7

10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb46915.x

10.1213/01.ANE.0000081061.12235.55

10.1093/bja/ael217

10.2165/00003495-200363070-00003

Rimback G, 1990, Anesth Analg, 70, 414, 10.1213/00000539-199002001-00414