Intersession improvement and outcome in psychotherapy

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy - Tập 26 Số 1 - Trang 146-155 - 2019
Andrew Koffmann1
1Department of Psychology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjective

Psychotherapy patients who experience large, stable symptomatic improvement between sessions are more likely than those without such sudden gains to benefit from treatment. However, there is limited empirical basis for the definition of sudden gains, and it is unclear how they may affect symptomatic change at other points in treatment.

Method

In a psychotherapy training clinic, 149 adults completed a distress measure at each session. For each criterion in the definition of sudden gains, we evaluated the prediction of outcome, possible moderating variables, local score instability, and multisession change before and after score shifts.

Results

Large intersession improvement did not lead to increased rate of change later in treatment, but it did predict outcome, regardless of whether nearby session scores were stable. Early improvement during the first five treatment sessions was an independent predictor of outcome. Large intersession improvement generally occurred in the context of local score instability.

Conclusion

Sudden gains appear to predict outcome because of improvement inherent in the gains themselves. Early overall improvement predicts outcome almost as effectively as do sudden gains. There may be advantages to redefining sudden gains as large intersession improvement, regardless of local score stability.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/a0026455

American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM‐IV‐TR

10.1037/a0015235

10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004

Bohart A. C., 2013, Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 219

10.1037/a0031198

Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

10.1007/s00278-015-0019-6

10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

10.1037/cou0000150

10.1002/jclp.20748

10.1002/jclp.10044

10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329

10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.59

10.1097/NMD.0000000000000263

10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059

10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12

10.1002/da.22119

10.1016/j.brat.2006.06.008

10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.002

10.1080/00223891.2014.907171

10.1080/10503307.2017.1294771

10.1080/10503307.2018.1506950

Lambert M. J., 1996, Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2)

Lambert M. J., 2001, Administration and scoring manual for the Life Status Questionnaire (LSQ30) [Draft Version]

10.1026/1616-3443.36.4.261

10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.06.012

10.1037/a0014488

10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.14

10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.864

10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.894

10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.168

10.1111/cpsp.12029

10.1026/1616-3443.38.1.13

10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.38

10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.173

10.1037/a0032879

10.2174/1573400510666140929195441

10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.008

Wampold B.E. &Imel Z.E.(2015).The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work(2ded.).New York:Routledge DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203582015.

10.1037/ccp0000263