Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Diễn Giải Sự Phụ Thuộc Trong Siêu Hình Học Của Fazang
Tóm tắt
Bài báo này xem xét siêu hình học về sự phụ thuộc lẫn nhau trong tác phẩm của nhà Phật giáo Trung Quốc Fazang. Cách tiếp cận chủ đạo của siêu hình học này giải thích nó như một hình thức của chủ nghĩa nhất quán siêu hình, trong đó mọi thứ phụ thuộc vào mọi thứ khác, không có cá nhân nào là nền tảng hơn bất kỳ cá nhân nào khác, và do đó thực tại tự thân không có nền tảng theo nghĩa là các chuỗi phụ thuộc không bao giờ kết thúc. Ngược lại, tôi lập luận rằng siêu hình học của Fazang nên được hiểu là một loại chủ nghĩa nền tảng mới. Tôi cũng lập luận, sử dụng các kỹ thuật lý thuyết tập hợp và đồ thị, rằng có một cách nhất quán để mô hình hóa cách diễn giải thay thế này, và rằng mô hình này khác biệt theo những cách quan trọng so với mô hình chủ nghĩa nhất quán.
Từ khóa
#siêu hình học #sự phụ thuộc lẫn nhau #Fazang #chủ nghĩa nhất quán #chủ nghĩa nền tảng #lý thuyết tập hợp #lý thuyết đồ thịTài liệu tham khảo
Antognazza, M. R. (2015). The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of Its History. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.974020
Barnes, Elizabeth. (2018). Symmetric Dependence. In Ricki Bliss and Graham Priest (Eds.), Reality and Its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality (pp. 50–69) New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755630.003.0003
Barnhill, David L. (1990). Indra’s Net as Food Chain: Gary Snyder's Ecological Vision. Ten Directions, 11, 20–29.
Baxter, D. L. M. (2018). Self-Differing, Aspects, and Leibniz’s Law. Nous, 52(4), 900–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12199
Bliss, Ricki. Forthcoming. Some Work for a Theory of Grounding? In Magali Roques (Ed.), Grounding in Medieval Philosophy. Boston: Brill.
Bliss, R. L. (2014). Viciousness and the Structure of Reality. Philosophical Studies, 166(2), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0043-0
Metaphysical Dependence, East and West. In Steven M. Emmanuel (Ed.), Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach (pp. 63-85). Malden, MA: John Wily & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119424246.ch4
Cargile, J. (2003). On “Alexander’s” Dictum. Topoi, 22, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024926205716
Chang, G. C. C. (1972). The Buddhist Teaching of Totality: The Philosophy of Hwa Yen Buddhism. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Chou, P. (2003). Wŏnhyo’s View of the Huayan Doctrine. International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture, 2, 109–122.
Cleary, T., & (trans.). (1993). The Flower Ornament Scripture: A Translation of The Avatamsaka Sutra. Shambhala.
Cook, Francis H. (1970). Fa-tsang's Treatise on the Five Doctrines: An Annotated Translation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Cook, F. H. (1977). Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hamar, I. (2012). Deconstructing and Reconstructing Yogācāra: Ten Levels of Consciousness-Only/One Mind in Huayan Buddhism. In R. Gimello, F. Girard, & I. Hamar (Eds.), Avatamsaka (Huayan, Kegon, Flower Ornament) Buddhism in East Asia: Origins and Adaptation of a Visual Culture (pp. 53–71). Harrassowitz.
Harvey, P. (1995). The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvāṇa in Early Buddhism. RoutledgeCurzon.
Ilangakoon, Samantha. (2014). Buddhist Religious Ecological Concepts. In Thich Nhat Tu and Thich Duc Thien (Eds.), Buddhist Response to Environmental Protection, Vietnam Buddhist University Series 22 (pp. 99–107). Hanoi: Religion Press.
Jones, Nicholaos. (2015). Buddhist Reductionism and Emptiness in Huayan Perspective. In Koji Tanaka, Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest (Eds.), The Moon Points Back (pp. 128–149). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190226862.003.0006
Jones, Nicholaos. (2018). The Metaphysics of Identity in Fazang's Huayan Wujiao Zhang: The Inexhaustible Freedom of Dependent Origination. In Youru Wang and Sandra A. Wawrytko (Eds.), Dao Companion to Chinese Buddhist Philosophy (pp. 295–323). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2939-3_13
Kaza, S. (1993). Acting with Compassion: Buddhism, Feminism, and the Environmental Crisis. In C. Adams (Ed.), Ecofeminism and the Sacred (pp. 50–69). Continuum Press.
Lai, W. (1980). The I-Ching and the Formation of the Hua-yen Philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 7(3), 245–258.
Liu, Ming-wood. (1979). The Teaching of Fa-tsang: An Examination of Buddhist Metaphysics. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of California, Los Angeles.
Morganti, Matteo. (2018). The Structure of Physical Reality: Beyond Foundationalism. In Ricki Bliss and Graham Priest (Eds.), Reality and Its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality (pp. 254–272). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755630.003.0014
Muller, A. C. (2016). The Emergence of Essence-Function (ti-yong) 體用 Hermeneutics in the Sinification of Indic Buddhism: An Overview. Bulgyohaglibyu 불교학리뷰 [critical Review for Buddhist Studies], 19, 111–152.
Muller, A. C. (1995). The Key Operative Concepts in Korean Buddhist Syncretic Philosophy; Interpenetration and Essence-Function in Wŏnhyo, Chinul and Kihwa. Tōyō Gakuen Daigaku Kiyō 東洋学園大学紀要 [bulletin of Tōyō Gakuen University], 3, 33–48.
Olds, L. E. (1992). Integrating Ontological Metaphors: Hierarchy and Interrelatedness. Soundings, 75(2–3), 403–420.
Park, S. B. (1983). Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment. State University of New York Press.
Pradeu, T. (2010). What is an Organism? An Immunological Answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2–3), 247–268.
Pridmore, Ralph W. (1991). Theory of Primary Colors and Invariant Hues. Color: Research and Application, 16(2), 122–129.
Priest, G. (2009). The Structure of Emptiness. Philosophy East and West, 59(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.0.0069
Priest, Graham. (2018a). Buddhist Dependence. In Ricki Bliss and Graham Priest (Eds.), Reality and its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality (pp. 126–139). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755630.003.0007
Priest, G. (2018b). The Fifth Corner of Four: An Essay on Buddhist Metaphysics and the Catuṣkoṭi. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758716.001.0001
Thiele, L. P. (2011). Indra’s Net and the Midas Touch: Living Sustainably in a Connected World. MIT Press.
Thompson, Naomi. (2016). Metaphysical Interdependence. In Mark Jago (Ed.), Reality Making (pp. 38–55). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755722.003.0003
Turner, Jason. (2014). Donald Baxter’s Composition as Identity. In A.J. Cotnoir and Donald L.M. Baxter (Eds.), Composition as Identity (pp. 225–243). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669615.003.0012
Van Norden, Bryan and Nicholaos Jones. (2019). Huayan Buddhism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/buddhism-huayan/.
Wang, R. R. (2005). Dong Zhongshu’s Transformation of Yin-Yang Theory and Contesting of Gender Equality. Philosophy East and West, 55(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2005.0013
Wang, R. R. (2015). Yinyang Narrative of Reality: Chinese Metaphysical Thinking. In C. Metaphysics & I. Problems (Eds.), Chenyang Li and Franklin Perkins (pp. 16–32). Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, T. (2005). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x