Interpersonal networks of managerial and professional women and men: descriptive characteristics

Emerald - 1995
Ronald J.Burke1, Mitchell G.Rothstein2, Julia M.Bristor3
1York University, North York, Canada
2University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada
3University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Tóm tắt

Presents descriptive information on interpersonal networks, both inside and outside of one′s organization, among managerial and professional women and men. Sex differences were also examined. Data were collected from 57 women and 55 men in early and mid‐career stages using questionnaires. Respondents indicated an average of 4.9 individuals in their inside networks and 2.8 individuals in their outside networks. There was a higher percentage of men in both networks, but the difference was smaller in outside than in inside networks. Respondents interacted with inside and outside network members about once a week. Inside network members held staff rather than line jobs, were at slightly higher organizational levels and were only modestly connected to powerful organizational leaders. Outside networks consisted mostly of friends and spouses. The networks of women and men had some differences. Women′s networks contained more women than did men′s networks. Women also received a greater number of developmental functions from their outside network, with a similar tendency from their inside network as well.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1 Morrison, A.M., White, R.P. and Van Velsor, E., Breaking the Glass Ceiling, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987.

2 Noe, R.A., “Women and mentoring: a review and research agenda”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, 1988, pp. 65‐78.

3 Clawson, J.G. and Kram, K.E., “Managing cross‐gender mentoring”, Business Horizons, Vol. 27, 1984, pp. 22‐31.

4 Kram, K.E. and Isabella, L.A., “Mentoring alternatives: the role of peer relationships in career development”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, 1985, pp. 110‐32.

5 Ragins, B.R. and Sundstrom, E., “Gender and power in organizations: a longitudinal perspective”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 105, 1989, pp. 51‐88.

6 Ibarra, H., “Personal networks of women and minorities in management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, 1993, pp. 56‐87.

7 Brass, D.J., “Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, 1984, pp. 518‐39.

8 Brass, D.J., “Men′s and women′s networks: a study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, 1985, pp. 327‐43.

9 Ibarra, H., “Differences in men and women′s access to informal networks at work: an intergroup perspective”, paper presented at the National Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco, CA, 1990.

10 Kram, K.E., Mentoring at Work, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1985.

11 Harragan, B.L., Games Mother Never Taught You: Corporate Gamesmanship for Women, Warner Books, New York, NY, 1977.

12 Denton, T.C., “Bonding and supportive relationships among black professional women: rituals of restoration”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 11, 1990, pp. 447‐57.

13 Ibarra, H., “Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising of firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, 1992, pp. 422‐47.