Integrating foresight into government. Is it possible? Is it likely?

Emerald - 2011
KnutErik Solem1
1Professor of Political Science at the Department of Political Science and Sociology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and explain the role of foresight in government, while making an attempt to ascertain why foresight is both necessary and rare. The paper aims to identify main areas where foresight is needed as well as the constraints that it faces. It also aims to provide some prescriptions and recommendations for improving both system and process.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology is based on case studies and literature search on futures/forecasting. Furthermore, analysis and observations are based on the author's own participation in different governmental and research environments; in several academic circles; within “think tanks” and on the international circuit (mostly at the UN, NATO, IAEA, IIASA and OECD) as well as within the Scandinavian scene.FindingsSeveral methodologies and techniques that are identified here may allow people to help perceive, evaluate and control the effects of their actions, present as well as future. However, they have, so far, only been used spasmodically. One reason for this state of affairs is that the difference between “well‐structured” (normal) and “ill‐structured” (futures type)problems has not been properly identified or satisfactorily solved. The political system faces three major problems: the problem of competence; the problem of deliverability; and the problem of legitimacy. All of these can be helped by the understanding and application of proper foresight methods and techniques.Originality/valueFrom the design/methodology point of view, this paper draws on the combined sources of international practice and theoretical implications. Its findings are easily comprehended and hence useful for their practical application for decision making on global as well as regional problems. The concept of fully “learning to unlearn” is of primary importance, as well as that of not “discounting the future”, for which several methods and techniques have been analyzed and suggested.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackoff, R. (1974), Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems, Wiley Publishers, New York, NY.

Coates, J.F. (1985), “Foresight in federal government policymaking”, Futures Research Quarterly, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 29‐53.

Gaivoronskaia, G. and Solem, K.E. (2004), “Genetic testing: affected parties and decision making”, Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 7 No. 5, pp. 481‐93.

Kaplan, R. (1994), “The coming anarchy”, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 273 No. 2, February, pp. 44‐76.

Kaplan, R. (2009), “Anarchy at sea”, The International Herald Tribune, April 14, p. 8.

Kaye, G.D. and Solem, K.E. (1992), “Decision making for global problems”, Futures, the Journal of Forecasting, Planning and Policy, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. %$‐64.

Kobayashi, Y. (2003), “Future mission of Japanese think tanks and NIRA summary of policy brief for Chief Cabinet Secretary”, available at: www.nira.go/jp/newse/panel/chairman.html.

Linstone, H. and Simmons, C. (Eds) (1977), Future Research: New Directions, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W.W. III (1972), The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York, NY.

Rejeski, D. (1994), “TQM: the search for strategy and innovation in the public sector”, Future Studies, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

Solem, K.E. (1980a), Futures of the International System: Reflections on Forecasting, Models and the Future Evolution of the International System, ORAE Project Report No. PR. 143, Directorate of Strategic Analysis, Operational Research and Analysis Establishment, Ottawa.

Solem, K.E. (1980b), Strategic Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Reactor Safety in the Commonwealth of Independent States and Eastern Europe, ORAE Project Report No. PR. 615, Directorate of Social and Economic Analysis, Operational Research and Analysis Establishment, Ottawa.

Solem, K.E. (1995a), “New challenges and possibilities in international politics: some notes on research, planning and decision making”, paper presented at the Third Norwegian National Conference in Political Science, Geilo, January 4‐6.

Solem, K.E. (1995b), “The future of operational research (OR) in planning for uncertainty”, Defence Research Group 1470/5‐95 Technical Proceedings AC/243, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Brussels.

Solem, K.E. (2003a), “Think tanks”, Proceedings of the 11th Norwegian National Political Science Conference, at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim.

Solem, K.E. (2003b), “Integrating foresight into decision making: a framework for environmatics?”, keynote paper presented at the ISESS 2003 Conference, Semmering, May.

Solem, K.E. (2007), Megatrender: Teori, bruk og forståelse, MAGMA tidsskrift for Økonomi og Ledelse, Årgang 3/200, Fagbokforlaget, Sivil/Økonomene, Bergen.

Solem, K.E. and Brattebø, H. (2001), “Industrial ecology as a strategic instrument for sustainability”, The International Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production, Vol. 2 No. 2.

Swayne, D., Denzer, R., Lilburne, L., Purvis, M., Quinn, N.W. and Torey, A. (2000), “Environmental decision support systems: exactly what are they”, in Denzer, R., Swayne, D.A., Purvis, M. and Schimak, G. (Eds), Environmental Software Systems: Environmental Information and Decision Support (Part IV), IFIP TC5 WG5 11, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

Gaivoronskaia, G. and Solem, K.E. (2001), “Managing risks in biotechnology: can we learn from nuclear power?”, Foresight, the journal of futures studies, strategic thinking and policy, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 33‐45.

Kaye, G.D. (1973), “The disappearing decision”, paper presented at the NATO Conference on The Role and Effectiveness of Decision Making: Themes and Practices, Luxembourg, August.

Solem, K.E. and Gaivoronskaia, G. (2005), “Biotechnology and foresight”, Foresight, the journal of futures studies, strategic thinking and policy, Vol. 7 No. 5, pp. 8‐20.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả