Integrating Motivation and Instruction: Towards a Unified Approach in Educational Psychology

Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Educational Achievement Systems.

Ainley, M. (2012). Students' interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (p. 283–302). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18.

Anderman, E.M. (2020). Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101864

Anderman, E.M., & Patrick, H. (2012). Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability/intelligence, and classroom climate. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 173–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_8

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224

Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.). (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study. Van Nostrand.

Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2) (pp. 89–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3

Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181

Ausubel, D. P. (1961). Learning by discovery: Rationale and mystique. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 45, 18–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263656104526904

Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman & Co.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.

Chadwick, D., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S. & Paas, F. (2015). Using cognitive load compliant instructions to support working memory for anxious students. 8th Cognitive Load Theory Conference: CO, USA.

Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Appleton, J.J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed.). National Association of School Psychologists.

Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L.-E., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015). Academic buoyancy, student achievement, and the linking role of control: A cross-lagged analysis of high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12066

Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.

Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277

Cromley, J. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (2012). Instruction and cognition. Cognitive Science, 3, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1192

De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032464

Dean, D., Jr., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91(3), 384–397.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–110). Oxford University Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). Guildford.

Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications (Rev). ADI Press.

Evans, P., & Martin, A. J. (2021). Explicit instruction. In J. Reeve (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Educational Psychology. Routledge.

Evans, P., & Martin, A. J. (2022). Load reduction instruction: Multilevel effects for motivation, engagement, and achievement in mathematics. Submitted for publication.

Finn, J.D., & Zimmer, K.S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (p. 97–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J.A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37

Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001

Graham, S. (2020). An attributional theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101861

Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. Guilford Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865

Hermkes, R., Mach, H., & Minnameier, G. (2018). Interaction-based coding of scaffolding processes. Learning and Instruction, 54, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.003

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682

Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Wigfield, A., & Möller, J. (2022). Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 148(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000354

Jones, B. D., & Carter, D. (2019). Relationships between students’ course perceptions, engagement, and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 22(4), 819–839.

Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4

Kalyuga, S., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2012). Educational implications of expertise reversal effects in learning and performance of complex cognitive and sensorimotor skills. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9195-x

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

Klahr, D. (2009). “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”: What about direct instruction? In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 291–310). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Abc-Clio.

Lee, H. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student learning: What has instruction got to do with it? Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 445–469.

Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2012). The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x

Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2013). Direct instruction and academic achievement. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement. Routledge.

Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2020). Direct instruction. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), Visible learning: Guide to student achievement. Routledge.

Lin, X. (2019). Achievement goal orientations as predictors of self-regulated learning strategies of international ESL students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 214–223.

Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice. British Psychological Society.

Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501

Martin, A. J. (1999–2022) Motivation and Engagement Scale. Lifelong Achievement Group.

Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036

Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic lifespan: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332214

Martin, A. J. (2010). Building classroom success: Eliminating academic fear and failure. Continuum.

Martin, A. J. (2012). Motivation and engagement: Conceptual, operational and empirical clarity. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_14

Martin, A. J. (2015). Teaching academically at-risk students in middle school: The roles of explicit instruction and guided discovery learning. In S. Groundwater-Smith & N. Mockler (Eds.), Big fish, little fish: Teaching and learning in the middle years. Cambridge University Press.

Martin, A. J. (2016). Using Load Reduction Instruction (LRI) to boost motivation and engagement. British Psychological Society.

Martin, A. J. (2021). The role of academic engagement in mediating the link between instruction and academic outcomes: New insights from load reduction instruction and the 4M Academic Engagement Framework. In S. Christenson & A. Reschly (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (2nd ed). Springer.

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Fear of failure: Friend or foe? Australian Psychologist, 38, 31–38.

Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583

Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2018). Load Reduction Instruction: Exploring a framework that assesses explicit instruction through to independent learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.018

Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 861–876.

Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2019). Load reduction instruction: Sequencing explicit instruction and guided discovery to enhance students’ motivation, engagement, learning, and achievement. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in Cognitive Load Theory: Rethinking teaching. Routledge.

Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2021). Load reduction instruction policy. In K-A. Allen., A. Reupert., & L. Oades (Eds). Building better schools with evidence-based policy: Adaptable policy for teachers and school leaders. Routledge.

Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00008-5

Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., & Green, J. (2009). Young people’s interpersonal relationships and academic and non-academic outcomes: The relative salience of teachers, parents, same-sex peers, and opposite-sex peers. Teachers College Record, March, http://www.tcrecord.org

Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement amongst middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025988

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150–162.

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Burns, E. C., Kennett, R., Munro-Smith, V., Collie, R. J., & Pearson, J. (2021). Assessing instructional cognitive load in the context of students’ psychological challenge and threat orientations: A multi-level latent profile analysis of students and classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 656994.

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Burns, E. C., Kennett, R., & Pearson, J. (2021b). Load reduction instruction in science and students’ science engagement and science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000552

Martin, A. J., Kennett, R., Pearson, J., Mansour, M., Papworth, B., & Malmberg, L. E. (2021c). Challenge and threat appraisals in high school science: Investigating the roles of psychological and physiological factors. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1887456

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Nagy, R. P., Collie, R. J., & Bostwick, K. C. P. (2023). Load reduction instruction in mathematics and English classrooms: A multilevel study of student and teacher reports. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102147

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools. ASCD.

Marzano, R. J. (2011). Art and science of teaching / The perils and promises of discovery learning. Educational Leadership, 69, 86–87.

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2010). Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning. (pp. 131–152). In J.L. Plass., R. Moreno., & R. Brunken (Eds). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.009

McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022225

McInerney, D. M., Yeung, A. S., & McInerney, V. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of the Inventory of School Motivation (ISM): Motivation orientations of Navajo and Anglo students. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2, 135–153.

Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hicks, L., Roesser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., Kaplan, A., Arunkumar, R., & Middleton, M. (1997). Patterns of Adaptive Learning (PALS). University of Michigan.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000U6&topic_id=1

Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019

Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K.A. (2012). Enhancing students' performance in traditional education: Implications from the expert performance approach and deliberate practice (pp. 257–293). In K.R. Harris., S. Graham., & T. Urdan (Eds). APA educational psychology handbook. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-010

Nolen, S. B. (2020). A situative turn in the conversation on motivation theories. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101866

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1

Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12

Piaget, J. (1954/2013) The construction of reality in the child. Routledge https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0

Pressley, M., Roehrig, A. D., Raphael, L., Dolezal, S., Bohn, C., Mohan, L., Wharton-McDonald, R., Bogner, K., & Hogan, K. (2003). Teaching processes in elementary and secondary education. In W.M. Reynolds & G.E. Miller (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0708

Purdie, N., & Ellis, L. (2005). A review of the empirical evidence identifying effective interventions and teaching practices for students with learning difficulties in Years 4, 5, and 6. Australian Council for Educational Research.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.

Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12086

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R.K. (2010). Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. (pp. 91–108). In J.L. Plass., R. Moreno., & R. Brunken (Eds). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007

Reschly, A.L., & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1

Rosenshine, B. V. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941309

Rosenshine, B. V. (2009). The empirical support for direct instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Routledge.

Rosenshine, B. V., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). McMillan.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Promoting self-determined school engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of school motivation. Routledge.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263350

Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Information Age Publishing.

Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304398

Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2011). Perceived control and the development of coping. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 35–59). Oxford University Press.

Skinner, Ε.Α., & Pitzer, J.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2

Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d

Sweller, J. (2012). Human cognitive architecture: Why some instructional procedures work and others do not (pp. 295–325). In K.R. Harris., S. Graham., & T. Urdan (Eds). APA educational psychology handbook. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-011

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Routledge.

Urdan, T., & Kaplan, A. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862

Usher, E. L., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Social cognitive theoretical perspective of self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 19–35). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, É. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1992). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297047

Voelkl, K.E. (2012). School identification. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_9

Vygotsky, L. S. (1970). Thought and language. MIT Press.

Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45, 38–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433596

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Wigfield, A., & Koenka, A. C. (2020). Where do we go from here in academic motivation theory and research? Some reflections and recommendations for future work. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101872

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653–678. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100348

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2021). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 1–32.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation. In: F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Academic motivation of adolescents. Information Age Publishing.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In: J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). Cambridge University Press.