Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities
Tóm tắt
Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer has been shown to reduce mortality; however, not all men and women are screened in the USA. Further, there are disparities in screening uptake by people from racial and ethnic minority groups, people with low income, people who lack health insurance, and those who lack access to care. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funds two programs—the Colorectal Cancer Control Program and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program—to help increase cancer screenings among groups that have been economically and socially marginalized. The goal of this manuscript is to describe how programs and their partners integrate evidence-based interventions (e.g., patient reminders) and supporting activities (e.g., practice facilitation to optimize electronic medical records) across colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings, and we suggest research areas based on implementation science. We conducted an exploratory assessment using qualitative and quantitative data to describe implementation of integrated interventions and supporting activities for cancer screening. We conducted 10 site visits and follow-up telephone interviews with health systems and their partners to inform the integration processes. We developed a conceptual model to describe the integration processes and reviewed screening recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force to illustrate challenges in integration. To identify factors important in program implementation, we asked program implementers to rank domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Health systems integrated interventions for all screenings across single and multiple levels. Although potentially efficient, there were challenges due to differing eligibility of screenings by age, gender, frequency, and location of services. Program implementers ranked complexity, cost, implementation climate, and engagement of appropriate staff in implementation among the most important factors to success. Integrating interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of cancer screenings could be an effective and efficient approach, but we currently do not have the evidence to recommend widescale adoption. Detailed multilevel measures related to process, screening, and implementation outcomes, and cost are required to evaluate integrated programs. Systematic studies can help to ascertain the benefits of integrating interventions and supporting activities for multiple cancer screenings, and we suggest research areas that might address current gaps in the literature.
Tài liệu tham khảo
U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: us preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3400321.
U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320(7):674–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10897 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140884.
Siu AL, Force USPST. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):279–96. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2886 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26757170.
Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, White MC, Shapiro JA, de Moor J, Doria-Rose VP, et al. Cancer screening test receipt - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(2):29–35. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7002a1 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444294.
Buskwofie A, David-West G, Clare CA. A review of cervical cancer: incidence and disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020;112(2):229–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.002 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32278478.
Demb J, Gupta S. Racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening pose persistent challenges to health equity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1691–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.042 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31786329.
Hall IJ, Tangka FKL, Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Graubard BI, Breen N. Patterns and trends in cancer screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E97. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170465 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048233.
Seeff LC, DeGroff A, Tangka F, Wanliss E, Major A, Nadel M, et al. Development of a federally funded demonstration colorectal cancer screening program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(2):A64. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18341799.
Joseph DA, DeGroff A. The CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2015. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E159. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.190336 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31808418.
Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Hoover S, Lara C, Eastman C, Glaze B, et al. Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)’s learning laboratory. Cancer Causes Control. 2019;30(2):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1109-x . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552592.
Community Preventive Services Task Force. The guide to community preventive services. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Community Preventive Services Task Force; 2016. Available from: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/cancer-screening-multicomponent-interventions-colorectal-cancer.
Subramanian S, Tangka FK, Hoover S, Degroff A, Royalty J, Seeff LC. Clinical and programmatic costs of implementing colorectal cancer screening: evaluation of five programs. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34(2):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.005.
Subramanian S, Tangka FK, Hoover S, Beebe MC, DeGroff A, Royalty J, et al. Costs of planning and implementing the CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. 2013;119(Suppl 15):2855–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28158 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868480.
Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Beebe MC, Hoover S, Royalty J, Seeff LC. Clinical costs of colorectal cancer screening in 5 federally funded demonstration programs. Cancer. 2013;119 Suppl 15(0 15):2863–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28154 . Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23868481, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731092/.
Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Hoover S, Royalty J, DeGroff A, Joseph D. Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening. Eval Program Plann. 2017;62:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.007 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28190597.
Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Hoover S, Royalty J, Joseph K, DeGroff A, et al. Costs of promoting cancer screening: evidence from CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). Eval Program Plann. 2017;62:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.008 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27989647.
Health Resources & Services Administration. Federally Qualified Health Centers [Internet]. What is a Health Center? Official web site of the U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration; 2021 [updated August [Available from: https://bphc.hrsa.gov/about/what-is-a-health-center/index.html.
Lara CL, Means KL, Morwood KD, Lighthall WR, Hoover S, Tangka FKL, et al. Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4130–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31691 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3035947.
Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Hoover S, DeGroff A, Joseph D, Wong FL, et al. Economic evaluation of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening at federally qualified health centers. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(6):877–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920954168 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990042.
Dacus HLM, Wagner VL, Collins EA, Matson JM, Gates M, Hoover S, et al. Evaluation of patient-focused interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among New York state medicaid managed care patients. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4145–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31692 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359473.
Kemper KE, Glaze BL, Eastman CL, Waldron RC, Hoover S, Flagg T, et al. Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4121–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31693 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359468.
Kim KE, Randal F, Johnson M, Quinn M, Maene C, Hoover S, et al. Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4137–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31690 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359474.
Barajas M, Tangka FKL, Schultz J, Tantod K, Kempster YM, Omelu N, et al. Examining the effectiveness of provider incentives to increase CRC screening uptake in neighborhood healthcare: a California Federally Qualified Health Center. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(6):898–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920954166 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990046.
Conn ME, Kennedy-Rea S, Subramanian S, Baus A, Hoover S, Cunningham C, et al. Cost and effectiveness of reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening uptake in rural federally qualified health centers in West Virginia. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(6):891–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920954164 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990048.
Hardin V, Tangka FKL, Wood T, Boisseau B, Hoover S, DeGroff A, et al. The effectiveness and cost to improve colorectal cancer screening in a federally qualified homeless clinic in Eastern Kentucky. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(6):905–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920954165 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990049.
Kim KE, Tangka FKL, Jayaprakash M, Randal FT, Lam H, Freedman D, et al. Effectiveness and cost of implementing evidence-based interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among an underserved population in Chicago. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(6):884–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920954162 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990041.
Soloe C, Arena L, Schlueter D, Melillo S, DeGroff A, Tangka F, et al. Integrated implementation of evidence-based interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening through public health-primary care partnerships. Implement Sci Commun. Manuscript in review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-127902/v1
Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Edwards HM, Foster MK, Breslau ES, Chollette V, et al. Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012;2012(44):2–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs008 . Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22623590, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482968/.
Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(1):4–13.
Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM, Tosteson AN, Zauber AG, Geiger AM, et al. Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):120. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv120.
Subramanian S, Hoover S, Tangka FKL, DeGroff A, Soloe CS, Arena LC, et al. A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4154–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31686 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359464.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664226.
Potter MB, Somkin CP, Ackerson LM, Gomez V, Dao T, Horberg MA, et al. The FLU-FIT program: an effective colorectal cancer screening program for high volume flu shot clinics. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):577–83. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851145.
Potter MB, Walsh JM, Yu TM, Gildengorin G, Green LW, McPhee SJ. The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21665058.
Lam H, Quinn M, Cipriano-Steffens T, Jayaprakash M, Koebnick E, Randal F, et al. Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00150-9 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059156.
Nelson-Brantley H, Ellerbeck EF, McCrea-Robertson S, Brull J, Bacani McKenney J, Greiner KA, et al. Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study. Fam Med Community Health. 2021;9(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937796. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001326
Schlueter D, DeGroff A, Soloe C, Arena L, Melillo S, Tangka F, et al. Factors that support sustainability of health systems change to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics: a longitudinal qualitative study. Health Promot Pract. 2022:15248399221091999. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582930. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399221091999
Leeman J, Askelson N, Ko LK, Rohweder CL, Avelis J, Best A, et al. Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: a qualitative study. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(2):394–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz023 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794725.
Liang S, Kegler MC, Cotter M, Emily P, Beasley D, Hermstad A, et al. Integrating evidence-based practices for increasing cancer screenings in safety net health systems: a multiple case study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2016;11:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0477-4 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27485452.
Tabung FK, Daguise VG, Lydiard D, Steck SE. An integrated approach to addressing chronic disease risk factors in financially disadvantaged women in South Carolina. Am J Health Promot. 2017;31(4):325–32. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.141010-QUAN-512 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26730554.
Gregory-Mercado KY, Will J, True S, Royalty J, Starcher ET 2nd, Khavjou O, et al. A combined approach to women’s health is associated with a greater likelihood of repeat mammography in a population of financially disadvantaged women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(4):A89. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17875264.
Brandzel SD, Bowles EJA, Wieneke A, Bradford SC, Kimbel K, Gao H, et al. Cancer screening reminders: addressing the spectrum of patient preferences. Perm J. 2017;21:17–051. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-051 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035189.
Buist DSM, Gao H, Anderson ML, Onega T, Brandzel S, Rabelhofer MA, et al. Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters. Prev Med. 2017;102:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655547.
Neugut AI, MacLean SA, Dai WF, Jacobson JS. Physician characteristics and decisions regarding cancer screening: a systematic review. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22(1):48–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2017.0206 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29889616.
Miake-Lye IM, Delevan DM, Ganz DA, Mittman BS, Finley EP. Unpacking organizational readiness for change: an updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):106.
Moss JL, Roy S, Shen C, Cooper JD, Lennon RP, Lengerich EJ, et al. Geographic variation in overscreening for colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer among older adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2011645. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11645 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716514.
Kepka D, Breen N, King JB, Benard VB, Saraiya M. Overuse of papanicolaou testing among older women and among women without a cervix. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):293–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12607 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24276745.
Oregon Health Authority. CCO incentive measure specification sheet for 2019 measurement year: colorectal cancer screening, basic health measurement. Oregon Health Authority; 2018 [Available from: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/ANALYTICS/CCOMetrics/2019-Colorectal-Cancer-Screening.pdf.