Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Quyết định giảng dạy và vai trò của giảng viên toán học tại trường cao đẳng cộng đồng
Tóm tắt
Chúng tôi điều tra lý do cho các quyết định giảng dạy được đề xuất bởi hai nhóm giảng viên toán học của trường cao đẳng cộng đồng (toàn thời gian và bán thời gian), khi họ thảo luận về các hoạt hình trong lớp học hình học lượng giác mà vi phạm một số quy tắc lớp học. Mặc dù cả hai nhóm giảng viên biện minh cho các quyết định của họ theo cách tương tự, nhưng cách họ nói chuyện thì khác nhau. Chúng tôi đã sử dụng ngôn ngữ học chức năng hệ thống để mô tả những khác biệt mà chúng tôi quan sát được: ngôn ngữ của giảng viên bán thời gian có tính chất không chắc chắn hơn, điều này gợi ý về tình trạng mong manh của họ trong tổ chức. Những phát hiện này có thể giải thích nhận thức tiêu cực trong học thuật về giảng viên bán thời gian, nhưng nhận thức đó có thể không được biện minh trong lớp học. Các kết quả của nghiên cứu này gợi ý rằng cần có thêm nghiên cứu chú ý đến cả bối cảnh xã hội và giáo viên như những cá nhân để hiểu rõ hơn về quá trình ra quyết định của giáo viên.
Từ khóa
#quyết định giảng dạy #giảng viên cao đẳng cộng đồng #ngôn ngữ học chức năng hệ thống #nhận thức về giảng viên bán thời gianTài liệu tham khảo
Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. M. (2000). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Agency and language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Ahearn, L. M. (2010). Agency and language. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Japsers (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics highlights: Society and language use (Vol. 7, pp. 28–48). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Alfred, R., Shults, C., Jaquette, O., & Strickland, S. (2009). Community colleges on the horizon: challenge, choice, or abundance. Lanham: Rowman and Littelfield.
Baldwin, R. G., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2011). Contingent faculty as teachers what we know; what we need to know. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1485–1509.
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: the unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). New York: Macmillan.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Beisiegel, M., & Simmt, E. (2012). Formation of mathematics graduate students’ mathematician-as-teacher identity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(1), 34–39.
Benjamin, E. (1998). Declining faculty availability to students is the problem—but tenure is not the explanation. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(5), 716–735.
Benjamin, E. (2002). How over-reliance upon contingent appointments diminishes faculty involvement in student learning. Peer Review, 5(1), 4–10.
Bettinger, E., & Long, B. T. (2004). Do college instructors matter? the effects of adjuncts and graduate assistants on students’ interests and success. (NBER Working Paper No. 10370). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Blair, R., Kirkman, E. E., & Maxwell, J. W. (2013). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States. Fall 2010 CBMS Survey. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
Borko, H., Roberts, S. A., & Shavelson, R. (2008). Teachers’ decision making: from Alan J. Bishop to today. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education (pp. 37–70). New York: Springer.
Carrell, S. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 409–432.
Eagan, M. K., & Jaeger, A. J. (2009). Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on community college transfer. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 168–188.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 647–659.
Griffiths, B. (2015). “This is my profession:” How notions of teaching enable and constrain autonomy of community college writing instructors. (unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Hall, J. K. (2012). Teaching and researching language and culture. New York: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through conversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 2–14.
Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: studying the justifications of actions in mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 405–462.
Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2012). On the instructional triangle and the sources of justifications for the actions of the mathematics teacher. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Herbst, P., & Miyakawa, T. (2008). When, how, and why prove theorems: a methdology to study the perspective of geometry teachers. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 30, 469–486.
Herbst, P., Nachlieli, T., & Chazan, D. (2011). Studying the practical rationality of mathematics teaching: what goes into “installing” a theorem in geometry? Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 1–38.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2011). Understanding non-tenure track faculty new assumptions and theories for conceptualizing behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1419–1442.
Kosko, K., & Herbst, P. (2012). A deeper look at how teachers say what they say: a quantitative modality analysis of teacher-to-teacher talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 589–598.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
McAlister-Raeburn, M., & Mesa, V. (2015). Normativity and autonomy in instructional decision-making. Poster presented at the Undergraduate research opportunity program spring research symposium. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mesa, V., & Herbst, P. (2011a). Designing representations of trigonometry instruction to study the rationality of community college teaching. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 41–52.
Mesa, V., & Herbst, P. (2011b). Using animations of teaching to probe the didactical contract in community college mathematics. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Portland, Oregon.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: a theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
Seidman, E. (1985). In the words of the faculty: Perspectives on improving teaching and educational quality in community colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Townsend, B. K., & Twombly, S. (2007). Community college faculty: Overlooked and undervalued. (ASHE higher education report. Vol. 32, No. 6). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: a framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learning through practice. Teacher Development, 9(3), 315–345.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2010a). Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Walshaw, M. (2010b). Learning to teach: Powerful practices at work during the practicum. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking Pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.