Instructional and motivational classroom discourse and their relationship with teacher autonomy and competence support—findings from teacher professional development

Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering need-supportive teaching style: intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 595–609.

Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.

Alexander, R. J. (2005). Culture, dialogue and learning: notes on an emerging pedagogy. Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology. England: University of Durham.

Appleton, J., Christenson, S., & Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883 .

Assor, A., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Mapping the domain of autonomy support. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 101–120). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56–95.

Behrmann, L., & Souvignier, E. (2015). Effects of fit between teachers’ instructional beliefs and didactical principles of reading programs. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 295–312.

Borko, H., Jacobs, J. K., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012 .

Brunner, E., Domhof, S., & Langer, F. (2002). Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Michigan: Wiley.

Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599–607.

Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rackozy, K., & Pauli, C. (2011). Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: “nice to have” or something more? Learning and Instruction, 21, 452–466. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.008 .

Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111.

Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: the importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.001 .

Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes.

Dawes, L. (2004). Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.

Deci, E., Vallerande, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189x08331140 .

Elbers, E., & Streefland, L. (2000). Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 479–490.

Fischler, H. (1994). Concerning the difference between intention and action: teachers’ conceptions and actions in physics teaching. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and action: Research on teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 165–180). London: Falmer Press.

Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.

Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284–316. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2011.573019 .

Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R., Swanson, R., DeLeon, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. (2016). Teachers' formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44, 267–291. doi: 10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3 .

Gegenfurtner, A., Veermans, K., Festner, D., & Gruber, H. (2009). Motivation to transfer training: an integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 403–423.

Gröschner, A., Seidel, T., Kiemer, K., & Pehmer, A.-K. (2015). Through the lens of teacher professional development components: the "Dialogic Video Cycle" as an innovative program to foster classroom dialogue. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 729–756. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.939692 .

Gröschner, A., Schindler, A.-K., Kiemer, K. & Seidel, T. (2016). Fostering Classroom Dialogue in Math and Science Classrooms: Changing Teacher Practice by Addressing Purposeful Activities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Washington, D.C.

Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512 .

Hetzner, S., Heid, H., & Gruber, H. (2012). Change at work and professional learning: how readiness to change, self-determination and personal initiative affect individual learning through reflection. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 539–555.

Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10.

Howe, C. (2009). Expert support for group work in elementary science: The role of consensus. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. New perspectives in learning and instruction (pp. 93–105). New York: Routledge.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. doi: 10.1037/a0019682 .

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.

Jungwirth, H. (1993). Routines in classroom discourse: an ethnomethodological approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(4), 375–387.

Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23(1), 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002 .

Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (2012). Enhancing autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue in schools: conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 251–269.

Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A.-K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35(1), 94–103.

Knollmann, M., & Wild, E. (2007). Quality of parental support and students’ emotions during homework: moderating effects of students’ motivational orientations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(1), 63–76.

Kunter, M. (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht. Münster: Waxmann.

Lee, V. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: the case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.

Lemos, M. (2001). Context-bound research in the study of motivation in the classroom. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 129–147). Amsterdam: Pergamo.

Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 529–545.

Lipowsky, F., & Rzejak, D. (2015). Key features of effective professional development programmes for teachers. Ricercazione. Six-monthly Journal on Learning. Research and Innovation in Education, 7(2), 27–51.

Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., & Klieme, E. (2007). Gleicher Unterricht-gleiche Chancen für alle? Die Verteilung von Schülerbeiträgen im Klassenunterricht. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 35(2), 125–147.

Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 262(3), 32–51.

Lovitt, C., & Clarke, D. M. (1988). Mathematics curriculum and teaching program. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: a review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295–314.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: the value of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001 .

Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1348/000709909x479853 .

Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430–445. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2014.934087 .

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: a sociocultural approach. New York: Routledge.

Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25.

Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2007). Immediate and delayed effects of using a classroom case exemplar in teacher education: the role of presentation format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 194–206. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.194 .

Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 116–139. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.961800 .

Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386. doi: 10.1177/1094428106291059 .

Morton, T. (2012). Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 101–110.

Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus. Muthén & Muthén.

Myhill, D. A., Jones, S. M., & Hopper, R. (Eds.). (2005). Talking, listening, learning: effective talk in the primary classroom. Maidenhead: Open UniversityPress.

Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. (2012). nparLD: an R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Journal of Statistical Software, 50(12), 1–23.

Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Horn, I. S. (2012). Methods for taking a situative approach to studying the development of motivation, identity, and learning in multiple social contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(2), 267–284.

Opfer, V. D., Pedder, D. G., & Lavicza, Z. (2011). The role of teachers’ orientation to learning in professional development and change: a national study of teachers in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 443–453. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.014 .

Pehmer, A.-K., Kiemer, K., & Gröschner, A. (2014). Produktive Lehrer-Schüler-Kommunikation: ein Kategoriensystem zur Erfassung Produktiver Gesprächsführung im Klassengespräch und in Schülerarbeitsphasen. Friedl-Schöller Endowed Chair for Teaching and Learning Research. TUM School of Education.

Pope, D. C. (2003). Doing school: how we are creating a generation of stressed-out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press.

R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing [online]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org [Accessed 6 November 2013].

Ramm, G., Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., et al. (2006). PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Münster: Waxmann.

Reeve, J. M. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: what autonomy supportive teachers do and what their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(4), 225–236.

Reeve, J. M. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990 .

Reeve, J. M., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.129 .

Reeve, J. M., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy supportive teachers: how they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537–548. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.537 .

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 178–189.

Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: a dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31–60). Greenwich: Information Age Press.

Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., & Wang, C. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: a multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93–110.

Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01066 .

Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: teachers' uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116–126.

Rimmele, R. (2004). Videograph. Kiel: IPN.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 .

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectic perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.

Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51.

Schindler, A.-K., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). Teaching science effectively: a case study on student verbal engagement in classroom dialogue. Orbis Scolae. Striving for Change: Video-Based Teacher Education Programmes and Related Research, 9(2), 9–34.

Schneewind, K. A. (1995). Impact of family processes on control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 114–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

Schoppek, W. (2015). Mehrebenenanalyse oder varianzanalyse? Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 47, 199–209.

Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 228–240. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.002 .

Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Duit, R., & Lehrke, M. (Eds.). (2003a). Technischer Bericht zur Videostudie “Lehr-Lern-Prozesse im Physikunterricht”. Kiel: IPN.

Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2003b). Opportunities for learning motivation in classroom discourse - combination of video analysis and student questionnaires. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31(2), 142–165.

Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., & Kobarg, M. (2005). How to run a video study. Technical report of the IPN Video Study. Münster: Waxmann.

Sherin, M. G., & Van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1348/000709908X304398 .

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.

Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.633 .

Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 .

Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2008). Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 23(3), 295–317.

Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., & Holzberger, D. (2016). Intra-individual differences in developing professional vision—preservice teachers’ changes in the course of an innovative teacher education program. Instructional Science, 40, 293–209. doi: 10.1007/s11251-016-9373-1 .

Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychological Review, 23, 159–188. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7 .

Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). The effects of an experimental programme to support students’ autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 239–253.

Timperley, H., Wilson, A, Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Available from: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341 [Accessed 27 May 2015].

Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011 .

Turner, J., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. The Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1759–1785.

Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: a multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88–106.

Urdan, T. C. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures. European Psychologist, 9(4), 222–231. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.9.4.222 .

Van der Veen, C., van Kruistum, C., & Michaels, S. (2015). Productive classroom dialogue as an activity of shared thinking and communicating: a commentary on marsal. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22(4), 320–325.

van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: international perspectives (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.

Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431–439.

Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Lepola, J. (2001). Long term development of motivation and cognition in family and school contexts. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 295–315). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 294–302.

Vesico, V.D., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1),80–91.

Walker, J. M. (2008). Looking at teacher practices through the lens of parenting style. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2), 218–240.

Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: a review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551. doi: 10.3102/0034654308320292 .

Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–361.

Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493–516.

Wells, G. (2009). Community dialogue: the bridge between individual and society. Language Arts, 4, 290–301.

Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313. doi: 10.1126/science.1230725 .

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

Wu, W., West, S. G., & Taylor, A. B. (2009). Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. Psychological Methods, 14(3), 183.

Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454–462.