Instructional Quality Features in Videotaped Biology Lessons: Content-Independent Description of Characteristics
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98.
Ang, R. P. (2005). Development and validation of the teacher-student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 55–73.
Asoko, H., & Scott, P. (2006). Talk in science classrooms. In W. Harlen (Ed.), ASE guide to primary science education (pp. 158–166). Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.
Baumert, J., Bos, W., & Lehmann, R. (2000). TIMSS/III. Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn [TIMSS/III. Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Mathematical and science education at the end of school]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., …, & Weiß, M. (2001). PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich [PISA 2000: basic competencies of students in international comparison]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A, …, & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544–559.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: quality and equity of future primary teachers' mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110386798 .
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20106 .
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Heidelberg: Springer.
Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE life sciences education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148 .
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.
Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Krauss, S., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Blum, W., …, & Tsai, Y.-M. (2006). Die professionelle Kompetenz von Mathematiklehrkräften: Konzeptualisierung, Erfassung und Bedeutung für den Unterricht. Eine Zwischenbilanz des COACTIV Projekts [The professional competence of mathematics teachers: conceptualization, observation and importance for instruction]. In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG Schwerpunktprogramms [Studies about educational quality of school, final report of the DFG priority program] (pp. 54–82). Münster: Waxmann.
Burchinal, M., Howes, C., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Predicting child outcomes at the end of kindergarten from the quality of pre-kindergarten teacher–child interactions and instruction. Applied Developmental Science, 12(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690802199418 .
Casabianca, J. M., McCaffrey, D. F., Gitomer, D. H., Bell, C. A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Effect of observation mode on measures of secondary mathematics teaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 757–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413486987 .
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centred teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.
Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 49–62). New York: Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Demuth, R. (Ed.). (2008). Chemie im Kontext: Von der Innovation zur nachhaltigen Verbreitung eines Unterrichtskonzepts [Chemistry in context: From innovation to the sustainable dissemination of a teaching concept]. Münster: Waxmann.
Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., & Neuhaus B. J. (2017). Die methodische und inhaltliche Ausrichtung quantitativer Videostudien zur Unterrichtsqualität im mathematischnaturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht. Ein Review. [The Methodical and Contentrelated Orientation of Quantitative Video Studies on Instructional Quality in Mathematics and Science Education. A Review]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-017-0058-3 .
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Elster, D. (2006). bik: Erste Ergebnisse der qualitativen Evaluation [bik: first results from the qualitative evaluation]. Retrieved from http://bik.ipn.uni-kiel.de/typo3/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Elster_Evaluation.pdf
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.
Ergönenc, J., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2014). The impact of pedagogical content knowledge on cognitive activation and student learning. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland (pp. 145–159). Waxmann: Münster.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Handbook of classroom management: research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fischer, H. E., Labudde, P., Neumann, K., & Viiri, J. (2014). Quality of instruction in physics: comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Münster: Waxmann.
Förtsch, C., Werner, S., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2016). Effects of biology teachers’ professional knowledge and cognitive activation on students’ achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 2642–2666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1257170 .
Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Dorfner, T., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). Effects of cognitive activation in biology lessons on students’ situational interest and achievement. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9517-y .
Glaser, B. R., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Grossman, P. (2014). Collecting evidence of instruction with video and observation data in NCES surveys. Washington, DC: Prepared for the National Academy of Education’s Workshop to Examine Current and Potential Uses of NCES Longitudinal Surveys by the Education Research Community.
Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Gosport: Ashford Colour Press Ltd..
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 .
Helmke, A. (2014). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Quality of teaching and teacher professionalism: diagnosis, evaluation and improvement of teaching.]. Bobingen: Klett.
Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002 .
Jatzwauk, P., Rumann, S., & Sandmann, A. (2008). Der Einfluss des Aufgabeneinsatzes im Biologieunterricht auf die Lernleistung der Schüler - Ergebnisse einer Videostudie [The effect of usage of tasks in biology education on learning performance—a video study]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 14, 263–283.
Jüttner, M., Boone, W., Park, S., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Development and use of a test instrument to measure biology teachers’ content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9157-y .
Kauertz, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2006). Assessing students’ level of knowledge and analyzing the reasons for learning difficulties in physics by Rasch analysis. In X. Liu & W. J. Boone (Eds.), Applications of Rasch measurement in science education (pp. 212–246). Maple Grove: JAM.
Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378 .
Klieme, E. (2006). Empirische Unterrichtsforschung: Aktuelle Entwicklungen, theoretische Grundlagen und fachspezifische Befunde. Einführung in den Thementeil [Empirical education research: current developments, theoretical fundamentals and subject-specific findings. Introduction to the part]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 765–773.
Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: Aufgabenkultur und Unterrichtsgestaltung [Mathematics instruction in secondary level I: “task culture and teaching structure”]. In Bundesministerium für Bildungund Forschung (BMBF) (Ed.), TIMSS – Impulse für Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte und Video-Dokumente [TIMSS—impulses for school and instruction. Research results, reform initiatives, practice results and video documents] (pp. 43–57). Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).
Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.
Kounin, J. S. (2006). Techniken der Klassenführung. Standardwerke aus Psychologie und Pädagogik - Reprints: Vol. 3. [Techniques of classroom management. Standard work from psychology and pedagogy—reprints: vol. 3]. Münster: Waxmann.
Kremer, K., Fischer, H. E., Kauertz, A., Mayer, J., Sumfleth, E., & Walpuski, M. (2012). Assessment of standards-based outcomes in science education: perspectives from the German project ESNaS. In S. Bernholt, K. Neumann, & P. Nentwig (Eds.), Making it tangible: learning outcomes in science education (pp. 201–218). Münster: Waxmann.
Kunter, M., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Psychologie des Unterrichts [Psychology of instruction]. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2011). Das Modell der Unterrichtsqualität in COACTIV: Eine multikriteriale Analyse. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klussmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV [Professional competence of teachers. Results of the research program COACTIV] (pp. 85–113). Waxmann: Münster.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002 .
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: results from the COACTIV project. New York: Springer.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013b). Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583 .
Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010 .
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187058 .
Lenske, G., Wagner, W., Wirth, J., Thillmann, H., Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., & Leutner, D. (2016). Die Bedeutung des pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens für die Qualität der Klassenführung und den Lernzuwachs der Schüler/innen im Physikunterricht [The importance of pedagogical knowledge for classroom management and for students’ achievement]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 19(1), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-015-0659-x .
Linacre, J. M. (2015). Winsteps (Version 3.81.0) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.shtml
Lipowsky, F. (2006). Auf den Lehrer kommt es an. Empirische Evidenzen für Zusammenhänge zwischen Lehrerkompetenzen, Lehrerhandeln und dem Lernen der Schüler [It depends on the teacher. Empirical evidence for correlations between teachers’ competencies, teachers’ actions and students’ learning]. In C. Allemann-Ghionda & E. Terhart (Eds.), Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 51. Beiheft. Kompetenzen und Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern: Ausbildung und Beruf (pp. 47–70). Beltz: Weinheim.
Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 .
Liu, N., & Neuhaus, B. (2013). Gender inequality in biology classes in China and its effects on students’ short-term outcomes. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.868060 .
Lücken, M. (2006). bik: Hintergründe der Evaluation und vorläufige Ergebnisse [bik: background of evaluation and preliminary results]. Retrieved from http://bik.ipn.uni-kiel.de/typo3/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Evaluation_L_cken.pdf
Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Duit, R. (2010). Physik im Kontext – Konzepte, Ideeen, Materialien für effizienten Physikunterricht [Physics in context—concepts, ideas, materials for efficient physics teaching]. Seelze: Friedrich Verlag.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., & Kyriakides, L. (2016). The scientific properties of teacher effects/effective teaching processes. In C. Chapman, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, P. Sammons, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Routledge international handbooks: the Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement: research, policy and practice (pp. 100–123). London: Routledge.
Munby, H., Russel, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers' knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 877–904). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Nawani, J., Rixius, J., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2016). Influence of using challenging tasks in biology classrooms on students’ cognitive knowledge structure: an empirical video study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1882–1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1213456 .
Neuhaus, B. J. (2007). Unterrichtsqualität als Forschungsfeld für empirische biologiedidaktische Studien [Instructional quality as a research field for empirical educational studies on biology education]. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Springer- Lehrbuch. Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung. Ein Handbuch für Lehramtsstudenten und Doktoranden [Springer- Textbook. Theories in research on biology education] (pp. 243–254). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies: a rationale for the assessment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220103 .
Osborne, J. (2010). Science without literacy: a ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559 .
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6 .
Perkins, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 91–114). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. L. (2012). Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS): secondary class manual. Charlottesville: Teachstone.
Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1971). Teaching as a subversive activity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Praetorius, A. K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lessons is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31, 2–12.
Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 523–553.
Schlesinger, L., & Jentsch, A. (2016). Theoretical and methodological challenges in measuring instructional quality in mathematics education using classroom observations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 29–40.
Schmelzing, S., van Driel, J. H., Jüttner, M., Brandenbusch, S., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013c). Development, evaluation, and validation of a paper-and-pencil test for measuring two components of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge concerning the “cardiovascular system”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1369–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9384-6 .
Scott, P. H. (1997). Developing science concepts in secondary classrooms: an analysis of pedagogical interactions from a Vygotskian perspective. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Scott, P., & Ametller, J. (2007). Teaching science in a meaningful way: striking a balance between ‘opening up’ and ‘closing down’ classroom talk. School Sciene Review, 88(324), 1–8.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317 .
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., & Kobarg, M. (2005). How to run a video study: technical report of the IPN video study. Münster: Waxmann.
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Rimmele, R., Dalehefte, I. M., Herweg, C., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2006). Blicke auf den Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie [Views to the physics instruction. Results from the IPN video study]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(6), 798–821.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Tepner, O., Borowski, A., Dollny, S., Fischer, H. E., Jüttner, M., Kirschner, S., …, & Wirth, J. (2012). Modell zur Entwicklung von Testitems zur Erfassung des Professionswissens von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften [Model for the development of test items measuring science teachers’ professional knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 7–28.
The Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of The Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. (2005a). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards in biology for the intermediate school-leaving qualification]. München: Wolters Kluwer.
The Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of The Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. (2005b). Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards in chemistry for the intermediate school-leaving qualification]. München: Wolters Kluwer.
The Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of The Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. (2005c). Bildungsstandards im Fach Physik für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards in physics for the intermediate school-leaving qualification]. München: Wolters Kluwer.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748 .
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
von Kotzebue, L., Förtsch, C., Reinold, P., Werner, S., Sczudlek, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2015). Quantitative Videostudien zum gymnasialen Biologieunterricht in Deutschland – Aktuelle Tendenzen und Entwicklungen. [Quantitative video studies on German biology instruction in the Gymnasium – actual trends and developments]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 21(1), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-015-0033-9 .
Voss, T., & Kunter, M. (2013). Teachers’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: results from the COACTIV project (pp. 207–228). New York: Springer.
Voss, T., Kunter, M., Seiz, J., Hoehne, V., & Baumert, J. (2014). Die Bedeutung des pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens von angehenden Lehrkräften für die Unterrichtsqualität [The significance of the pedagogical-psychological knowledge of future teachers for the quality of teaching]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(2), 184–201.
Wadouh, J., Liu, N., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2014). The effect of knowledge linking levels in biology lessons upon students’ knowledge structure. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 25–47.
Walberg, H. J., & Paik, S. J. (2000). Effective educational practices (Vol. 3). Brussels: UNESCO International Academy of Education/International Bureau of Education (IAE).
Wang, M., Haertel, G., & Walberg, H. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063003249 .
Werner, S. (2016). Zusammenhänge zwischen dem fachspezifischen Professionswissen einer Lehrkraft, dessen Unterrichtsgestaltung und Schülervariablen am Beispiel eines elaborierten Modelleinsatzes [Relations between the subject-specific content knowledge of a teacher, his instructional design and students’ variables on the example of an elaborated use of models]. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Werner, S., Förtsch, C., Boone, W., von Kotzebue, L. & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). Investigating how German biology teachers use models in classroom instruction: A video study. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9624-4 .
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yore, L. D., Biszanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.