Instructional Practices of Elementary Social Studies Teachers in North and South Carolina

Journal of Social Studies Research - Tập 38 - Trang 15-31 - 2014
Tina L. Heafner1, George B. Lipscomb2, Paul G. Fitchett1
1University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Middle, Secondary, and K-12 Education, College of Education, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States
2Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, United States

Tóm tắt

Using data from the Survey of the Status of Social Studies ( S4), this article describes the instructional decisions and practices of elementary teachers in two neighboring states, one where social studies is tested and another where it is not. We define students’ opportunity to learn within these states as a composite of three variables: time allocations for social studies (teacher reported instructional time), methods for teaching social studies (teacher reported instructional strategies), and content focus (teacher reported content emphases and state-mandated curriculum standards). Our guiding research question for this study was: To what extent do teachers’ perceptions of elementary school social studies instructional practices and content vary between two states with different testing policies for social studies? Initial findings revealed notable differences that could not be explained by testing policies alone. Therefore, we conducted an exploratory content analysis of the elementary social studies curricula in these neighboring states. We uncovered curricular differences that suggest that state standards influence teachers’ decisions in both what and how they choose to teach social studies. However, there were curriculum differences that did not align with S4 instructional methods and content focus output. Thus, we concluded that other factors apart from the curriculum guide teachers’ decision-making. Results provided evidence that students have different opportunities to learn based on (1) state testing policies in social studies, (2) curriculum content, (3) how social studies is delivered (e.g., stand-alone versus integration), and (4) time allocated to social studies. We concluded that these variables constrict or expand students’ opportunity to learn social studies and may influence teachers’ pedagogical and content choices in elementary social studies.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alleman J., Brophy J. Powerful units on food, clothing, and shelter Vol. 12001 HeinemanPortsmouth, NH 10.3102/0013189X07306523 Au W., 2009, Teacher Education Quarterly, 36, 43 10.1080/00933104.1997.10505821 10.4324/9781410610508 Berry, B., Smylie, M. & Fuller, E. (2008). Understanding teacher working conditions: A review and look to the future. Paper prepared for the Center for Teaching Quality. Hillsborough, NC, pp. 1–48. 10.1108/SSRP-02-2010-B0003 10.1080/00933104.2008.10473374 Brophy J., 1993, Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 4: Case studies of teaching and learning in social studies, 219 Brophy J., 2008, Handbook of research in social studies education, 33 Brophy J., Alleman J., Knighton B. Inside the social studies classroom 2009 RoutledgeNew York, NY Center on Educational Policy Choices, changes, challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era 2007 Center on Educational PolicyWashington, DC Center on Educational Policy Instructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects 2008 Centor on Educational PolicyWashington, DC Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). Vision for the College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Inquiry in Social Studies State Standards, pp. 1–8. Retrieved from: 〈http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/Vision_for_the_College_Career_and_Civic_Life_Framework_for_Inquiry_in_Social_Studies_State_Standards.html〉. Creswell J.W. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 2011 Addison WesleyBoston, MA 10.1177/0042085907304964 Duplass J.A. Teaching elementary social studies: Strategies, standards, and internet resources 2008 Houghton MifflinNew York, NY Farkas S., 2010, AEI Program on American Citizenship 10.1080/00933104.2010.10473418 10.1177/0895904812453998 Fitchett, P. G. & VanFossen, P. J. (2010). Survey of the status of social studies.Retrieved from: 〈http://coedpages.uncc.edu/coe/surveys/NationalSocialStudiesSurvey(final).pdf〉. 10.1108/SSRP-01-2013-B0001 10.3200/TSSS.95.2.71-74 10.1080/00933104.2006.10473307 Goodlad J. A place called school 2nd ed.2004 McGraw-HillNew York, NY Gradwell J.M., 2006, Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across states, 157 Grant S.G. History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms 2003 Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahway, NJ Grant S.G., 2007, Social Education, 71, 358 Grant S.G. Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States 2006 Information Age PublishingGreenwich, CT 10.1080/00094056.1937.10724151 Heafner, T. L. & Fitchett, P. G. (in review). An opportunity to learn US history: What NAEP data suggest regarding the opportunity gap. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 10.1080/00377996.2011.592165 Heafner T.L., 2012, Journal of Social Studies Research, 36, 190 10.1108/SSRP-02-2006-B0001 Heafner, T. & Passe, J. (2008). Playing the high stakes accountability game: Social studies on the sidelines. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY. Hess D., 2006, Handbook of research in social studies education, 124 10.4324/9780203878880 10.1108/SSRP-03-2009-B0012 Hirsch E. Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report to Governor Mike Easley on the 2004 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey 2005 Southeast Center for Teaching QualityChapel Hill, NC Hirsch E. North Carolina teacher working conditions survey brief: Teacher working conditions are student learning outcomes 2010 New Teacher CenterSanta Cruz, CA Hirsch E., Church K. North Carolina teacher working conditions survey brief: Teacher working conditions are student learning outcomes 2009 New Teacher CenterSanta Cruz, CA Hirsch E., Emerick S., Church K., Fuller E. Teacher working conditions are student learning outcomes: A report on the 2006 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey 2007 Center for Teaching QualityHillsborough, NC Holloway J.E., 2009, The Journal of Social Studes Research, 33, 235 Howard G.R. We can't teach what we don't know: White teachers, multiracial schools 2006 Teachers College PressNew York, NY Ladd, H. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of policy-relevant outcomes? Urban Institute: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Working Paper 33. Leming J.S., Ellington L., Schug M. Social studies in our nation's elementary and middle schools 2006 The Center of Survey Research and AnalysisHartford, CT Levstik L.S., 2008, Handbook of research in social studies education Lintner T., 2008, Journal of Social Studies Research, 32, 3 Martorella P.H., Beal C.M., Bolick C.M. Teaching social studies in middle and secondary schools 4th ed.2005 PearsonColumbus, OH 10.1177/003172170708800815 National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011a). The Nation's Report Card: Civics 2010 (No. NCES 2011-466). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education. National Center for Educatonal Statistics. (2011b). The Nation's Report Card: Geography 2010 (No. NCES 2011-467). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011c). The Nation's Report Card: US History (No. NCES 2011-468). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. NCDPI Standard Course of Study, 2006. Available from: 〈http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/docs/curriculum/socialstudies/scos/socialstudies.pdf〉. Patton M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods 2nd ed.1990 SageNewbury Park, CA 10.1080/00933104.2011.10473446 Ravitch D. The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education 2010 Basic BooksNew York, NY Ravitch D., Finn C. What do our 17-year olds know? A report on the National Assessment of History and Literature 1987 Harper CollinsNew York Reeves, C., Emerick, S. & Hirsch, E. (2006). Creating non-instructional time for elementary school teachers: Strategies from schools in North Carolina. Paper prepared for the Center for Teaching Quality, Hillsborough, NC, pp. 1–8. 10.1080/00933104.2006.10473318 Shaver, J. P. (1989). What is known about elementary school social studies? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Shaver, J. P., Davis Jr.O. L. & Helburn, S. W. (1978). An interpretive report on the status of pre-college social studies education on three NSF-funded studies. Available from ERIC (ED164363) from National Council for the Social Studies. Sierrere S.C., 2010, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 23, 4 Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook 1999 Sage PublicationsLondon 10.3102/0013189X009011011 Thornton S.J. Teaching social studies that matters 2005 Teachers College PressNew York 10.1080/00933104.2005.10473287 van Hover S.D., 2006, Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States, 195 van Hover, S. & Yeager, E. (2006). Virginia vs. Florida: Two beginning history teachers’ perceptions of the influence of high-stakes tests on their instructional decision-making. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA, April 2006. VanSledright B. In search of America's past 2002 Teachers College PressNew York VanSledright B. The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy 2011 RoutledgeNew York, NY Vogler K., 2007, Journal of Social Studies Research, 31, 20 Waring S.M., 2010, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 294 10.1177/016146810710900804 10.1177/016146810911100401 10.1108/SSRP-03-2006-B0005
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Social Studies Research

Tập 38

15-31

Thông tin tác giả