Giảng dạy khoa học dựa trên điều tra—nó là gì và liệu nó có quan trọng không? Kết quả từ một tổng hợp nghiên cứu giai đoạn 1984 đến 2002
Tóm tắt
Mục tiêu của Dự án Tổng hợp Điều tra là tổng hợp các phát hiện từ các nghiên cứu được tiến hành trong khoảng thời gian từ 1984 đến 2002 để giải quyết câu hỏi nghiên cứu,
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson R., 2007, Handbook of research on science education, 807
Bay M. Staver J. Bryan T. &Hale J.(1990 April).Science instruction for the mildly handicapped: Direct instruction versus discovery teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Atlanta GA.
Cakir M., 2008, Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implication for science pedagogy: A literature review, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3, 193
Chang C.‐Y. &Barufaldi J.(1997 March).Initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks through a problem solving based instructional model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Oak Brook IL.
Chang C.‐Y. &Mao S.‐L.(1998).The effects of an inquiry‐based instructional method on earth science students' achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching San Diego CA.
Dana L.(2001).The effects of the level of inquiry of situated secondary science laboratory activities on students' understanding of concepts and the nature of science ability to use process skills and attitudes toward problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Massachusetts‐Lowell.
Department for Education and Employment, 1992, The national curriculum for England
European Commission, 2007, Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe
Garson G.D., 2008, Logistic regression
Goodrum D. &Rennie L. Commonwealth of Australia. (2007).Australian school science education national action plan 2008–2012: Volume 1. Retrieved fromhttp://www.innovation.gov.au/Science AndResearch/publications/Documents/Volume1final_28August2008.pdf
Inter Academies Panel, 2006, Report of the working group on international collaboration in the evaluation of inquiry‐based science education programs
Lipsey M., 2001, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 49
McDavitt D.(1994).Teaching for understanding: Attaining higher order learning and increased achievement through experiential instruction. Unpublished manuscript Curry School of Education University of Virginia.
Myers L.(1988).Analysis of student outcomes in ninth‐grade physical science taught with a science/technology/society focus versus one taught with a textbook orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa.
National Research Council, 1996, National Science Education Standards
National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 P.L.107‐110. (2002).
Onwuegbuzie A., 2003, Typology of analytical and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research, Current Issues in Education [on‐line], 6
Pedhazur E., 1991, Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach
Sinclair A., 1994, Prediction making as an instructional strategy: Implications of teacher effects on learning, attitude toward science, and classroom participation, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 153
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc (April 2006a).Technical report 1: Generating the synthesis sample of studies. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport1.pdf
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc. (April 2006b).Technical Report 2: Conceptualizing inquiry science instruction. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport2.pdf.
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc. (April 2006c).Technical Report 3: Operationalizing the inclusion/exclusion coding process. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport3.pdf.
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc (April 2006d).Technical Report 4: Report‐study reconciliation process. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport4.pdf.
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc (April 2006e).Technical Report 5: Operationalizing the inquiry science instruction coding process. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport5.pdf.
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc (June 2009a).Technical report 6: Operationalizing the coding of research rigor context and study findings. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport6.pdf
The Inquiry Synthesis Project Center for Science Education Education Development Center Inc (June 2009b).Technical Report 7: Bibliography of Studies Included in Final Inquiry Synthesis Project Analyses. Retrieved fromhttp://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/pdfs/technicalReport7.pdf.
Vogt W.P., 1999, Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences