Information sharing, neighborhood demarcation, and yardstick competition: an empirical analysis of intergovernmental expenditure interaction in Japan
Tóm tắt
The Japanese government provides information on local fiscal performance through the Fiscal Index Tables for Similar Municipalities (FITS-M). The FITS-M categorize municipalities into groups of “similar localities” and provide them with the fiscal indices of their group members, enabling municipalities to use the tables to identify their “neighbors” (i.e., those in the same FITS-M group) and refer to their fiscal information as a “yardstick” for fiscal planning. We take advantage of this system to estimate municipal spending function. In particular, we examine whether the FITS-M help identify a defensible spatial weights matrix that properly describes municipal spending interactions. Our analysis shows that they do. In particular, geographical proximity is significant only between a pair of municipalities within a given FITS-M group, and it does not affect competition between pairs belonging to different groups even if they are located close to each other. This would suggest that the FITS-M work as intended, indicating that spending interaction among Japanese municipalities originates from yardstick competition and not from other types of fiscal competition.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahrens, A., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2015). Two-step Lasso estimation of the spatial weights matrix. Econometrics, 3(1), 128–155.
Akai, N., & Suhara, M. (2013). Strategic interaction among local governments in Japan: An application to cultural expenditure. Japanese Economic Review, 64(2), 232–247.
Anselin, L. (1984). Specification tests on the structure of interaction in spatial econometric models. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 54(1), 165–182.
Anselin, L. (1986). Non-nested tests on the weight structure in spatial autoregressive models: Some Monte-Carlo results. Journal of Regional Science, 26(2), 267–284.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, L., & Bera, A. K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. E. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 237–290). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2/3), 529–544.
Bailey, S. J., & Connolly, S. (1998). The flypaper effect: Identifying areas for further research. Public Choice, 95(3/4), 335–361.
Bailey, N., Holly, S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). A two-stage approach to spatiotemporal analysis with strong and weak cross-sectional dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics. doi:10.1002/jae.2468.
Bartolini, D., & Santolini, R. (2012). Political yardstick competition among Italian municipalities on spending decisions. Annals of Regional Science, 49(1), 213–235.
Beenstock, M., & Felsenstein, D. (2012). Nonparametric estimation of the spatial connectivity matrix using spatial panel data. Geographical Analysis, 44(4), 386–397.
Belotti, F., Hughes, G., & Mortari, A. P. (2013). XSMLE: Stata module for spatial panel data models estimation. Statistical Software Components S457610, Boston College Department of Economics, Revised March 15, 2014.
Bergstrom, T. C., & Goodman, R. P. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review, 63(3), 280–296.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.
Bhattacharjee, A., & Holly, S. (2013). Understanding interactions in social networks and committees. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(1), 23–53.
Bhattacharjee, A., & Jensen-Butler, C. (2013). Estimation of the spatial weights matrix under structural constraints. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(4), 617–634.
Bhattacharjee, A., Castro, E., Maiti, T., & Marques, J. (2015). Endogenous spatial structure and delineation of submarkets: A new framework with application to housing markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics. doi:10.1002/jae.2478.
Bivand, R., & Szymanski, S. (1997). Spatial dependence through local yardstick competition: Theory and testing. Economics Letters, 55(2), 257–265.
Bivand, R., & Szymanski, S. (2000). Modeling the spatial impact of the introduction of Compulsory Competitive Tendering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(2), 203–219.
Boadway, R. (1983). On the method of taxation and the provision of local public goods: Comment. American Economic Review, 72(4), 846–851.
Boarnet, M., & Glazer, A. (2002). Federal grants and yardstick competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 53–64.
Boarnet, M., Cemiglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2004). Yardstick competition in intergovernmental relationships: Theory and empirical predictions. Economics Letters, 83(3), 325–333.
Brueckner, J. K. (1998). Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(3), 438–467.
Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 175–188.
Brueckner, J. K., & Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54(3), 203–230.
Burridge, P. (2012). Improving the J test in the SARAR model by likelihood-based estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(1), 75–107.
Burridge, P., & Fingleton, B. (2010). Bootstrap inference in spatial econometrics: The J-test. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 93–119.
Caldeira, E. (2012). Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 878–897.
Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R, Jr. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307.
Chirinko, R. S., & Wilson, D. J. (2008/2013). Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper series 2008-03.
Costa, H., Veiga, L. G., & Portela, M. (2015). Interactions in local governments’ spending decisions: Evidence from Portugal. Regional Studies, 49(9), 1441–1456.
Dahlberg, M., & Edmark, K. (2008). Is there a “race-to-the-bottom” in the setting of welfare benefit levels? Evidence from a policy intervention. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1193–1209.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica, 49(3), 781–793.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inferences in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ermini, B., & Santolini, R. (2010). Local expenditure interaction in Italian municipalities: Do local council partnerships make a difference? Local Government Studies, 36(5), 655–677.
ESRI Japan. (2011). The national database on municipal borders [Zenkoku shi-cho-son kai data], Version 7.1. http://www.esrij.com/products/japan-shp/. Accessed November 12, 2014.
Facchini, F. (2014). The determinants of public spending: A survey in a methodological perspective. MPRA paper no. 53006, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
Figlio, D. N., Kolpin, V. W., & Reid, W. E. (1999). Do states play welfare games? Journal of Urban Economics, 46(3), 437–454.
Finney, M. M., & Yoon, M. J. (2003). Asymmetric interdependence in the provision of a local public good: An empirical examination. Public Finance Review, 31(6), 648–668.
Folmer, H., & Oud, J. (2008). How to get rid of W: A latent variables approach to modelling spatially lagged variables. Environment and Planning A, 40(10), 2526–2538.
Foucault, M., Madies, T., & Paty, S. (2008). Public spending interactions and local politics: Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice, 137(1), 57–80.
Gebremariam, G. H., Gebremariam, T. G., & Schaeffer, P. V. (2012). County-level determinants of local public services in Appalachia: A multivariate spatial autoregressive model approach. Annals of Regional Science, 49(1), 175–190.
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. (2014). Latitude and longitude of prefectural and municipal office locations [To-do-fu-ken Shi-cho-son no To-zai-nan-boku Ten no Keido Ido]. http://www.gsi.go.jp/KOKUJYOHO/center.htm. Accessed November 12, 2014.
Getis, A., & Aldstadt, J. (2004). Constructing the spatial weights matrix using a local statistic. Geographical Analysis, 36(2), 90–104.
Geys, B. (2006). Looking across borders: A test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3), 443–462.
Granger, C. W. J., King, M. L., & White, H. (1995). Comments on testing economic theories and the use of model selection criteria. Journal of Econometrics, 67(1), 173–187.
Griffith, A. D., & Lagona, R. (1998). On the quality of likelihood-based estimators in spatial autoregressive models when the data dependence structure is misspecified. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 69(1), 153–174.
Hanes, N. (2002). Spatial spillover effects in the Swedish local rescue services. Regional Studies, 36(5), 531–539.
Harris, R., Moffat, J., & Kravtsova, V. (2011). In search of “W”. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6(3), 249–270.
Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226.
Holly, S., Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2010). A spatio-temporal model of house prices in the USA. Journal of Econometrics, 158(1), 160–173.
Kelejian, H. H. (2008). A spatial J-test for model specification against a single or set of non-nested alternatives. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 1(1), 3–11.
Kelejian, H. H., & Piras, G. (2011). An extension of Kelejian’s J-test for non-nested spatial models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(3), 281–292.
Kelejian, H. H., & Piras, G. (2014). Estimation of spatial models with endogenous weighting matrices and an application to a demand model for cigarettes. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 46(C), 140–149.
Kelejian, H. H., & Piras, G. (2015). An extension of the J-test to a spatial panel data framework. Journal of Applied Econometrics. doi:10.1002/jae.2425.
Leamer, E. E. (1983). Let’s take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review, 73(1), 31–43.
Lee, L. F., & Yu, J. (2010a). Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 154(2), 165–185.
Lee, L. F., & Yu, J. (2010b). Some recent developments in spatial panel data models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 255–271.
Leenders, R. T. A. J. (2002). Modelling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24(1), 21–47.
Lu, X., & White, H. (2014). Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics. Journal of Econometrics, 178(P1), 194–206.
Leduc, S., Wilson, D. (2015). Are state governments roadblocks to federal stimulus? Evidence on the flypaper effect of highway grants in the 2009 Recovery Act. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper series, 2013-16.
Lundberg, J. (2006). Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies, 40(6), 631–644.
Lundberg, J. (2014). On the definition of W in empirical models of yardstick competition. Annals of Regional Science, 52(2), 597–610.
MacKinnon, J. G. (1983). Model specification tests against non-nested alternatives. Econometric Reviews, 2(1), 85–110.
MacKinnon, J. G. (1992). Model specification tests and artificial regressions. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(1), 102–146.
Matsuki, S. (2010). The twelve months of municipal budgeting [Jichitai zaimu no 12- kagetsu]. Tokyo: Gakuyo Shobo. (in Japanese).
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2014a). Annual report on municipal finances [Shi-Cho-Son betsu Kessan Joukyo Shirabe]. http://www.soumu.go.jp/iken/kessan_jokyo_2.html. Accessed September 16, 2014) (in Japanese).
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2014b). The fiscal indices tables for similar municipalities [Ruiji Dantai Betsu Shichoson Zaisei Shisu Hyo]. http://www.soumu.go.jp/iken/ruiji/. Accessed September 16, 2014 (in Japanese).
Murdoch, J. C., Rahmatian, M., & Thayer, M. A. (1993). A spatially autoregressive median voter model of recreational expenditures. Public Finance Quarterly, 21(3), 334–350.
Negishi, M. (2007). The role of modern fiscal analysis: On the historical processes leading to the establishment of the Fiscal Index Tables of Similar Municipalities [Gendai no chihozaisei bunseki no yakuwari: Ruijidantaibestu Shichoson Zaisei Shisuhyo no seiritsu katei no bunseki wo chushin to shite]. Local Public Finance [Chiho Zaisei], 46(9), 273–293. (in Japanese).
Nikkei Digital Media. (2014). Regional information files. Nikkei Economic Electronic Databank System. http://www.nikkei.co.jp/needs/. Accessed September 16, 2014.
Nishihama, S. (2007). Fiscal analysis of expenditure structures among similar municipalities [Saishutsu Kozo kara Mita Ruiji Dantai no Zaisei Bunseki]. Jichi Osaka, 57(12), 31–38. (in Japanese).
Nogare, C. D., & Galizzi, M. M. (2011). The political economy of cultural spending: Evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3), 203–231.
Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012.
Pesaran, M. H., & Weeks, M. (2003). Non-nested hypothesis testing: An overview. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (Chapter 13). College Station, TX: Blackwell.
Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1991). The likelihood dominance criterion: A new approach to model selection. Journal of Econometrics, 47(2–3), 227–242.
Qu, X., & Lee, L. F. (2015). Estimating a spatial autoregressive model with an endogenous spatial weight matrix. Journal of Econometrics, 184(2), 209–232.
Revelli, F. (2001). Spatial patterns in local taxation: Tax mimicking or error mimicking? Applied Economics, 33(9), 1101–1107.
Revelli, F. (2003). Reaction or interaction? Spatial process identification in multi-tiered government structures. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1), 29–53.
Revelli, F. (2006). Performance rating and yardstick competition in social service provision. Journal of Public Economics, 90(3), 459–475.
Revelli, F., & Tovmo, P. (2007). Revealed yardstick competition: Local government efficiency patterns in Norway. Journal of Urban Economics, 90(3), 459–475.
Rincke, J. (2010). A commuting-based refinement of the contiguity matrix for spatial models, and an application to local police expenditures. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 324–330.
Saha, A., Shumway, R., Talpaz, H. (1994). Performance of likelihood dominance and other nonnested model selection criteria: Some Monte Carlo results. Department of Agricultural Economics working paper. College Station: Texas A&M University.
Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 97–117.
Sandler, T. (1992). Collective action: Theory and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shleifer, A. (1985). A theory of yardstick competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3), 319–327.
Smith, T. (2009). Estimation bias in spatial models with strongly connected weight matrices. Geographical Analysis, 41(3), 307–332.
Solé-Ollé, A. (2006). Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(1), 32–53.
Stakhovych, S., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2008). Specification of spatial models: A simulation study on weights matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 88(2), 389–408.
Stetzer, F. (1982). Specifying weights in spatial forecasting models: The results of some experiments. Environment and Planning A, 14(5), 571–584.
Werck, K., Heydels, B., & Geys, B. (2008). The impact of “central places” on spatial spending patterns: Evidence from Flemish local government. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(1), 35–58.
Wildasin, D. E. (1988). Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition. Journal of Public Economics, 35(2), 229–240.
Williams, A. (1966). The optimal provision of public goods in a system of local government. Journal of Political Economy, 74(1), 18–33.
Wrede, M. (2001). Yardstick competition to tame the Leviathan. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 705–721.
Yu, J., de Jong, R., & Lee, L. F. (2008). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both \(n\) and \(T\) are large. Journal of Econometrics, 146(1), 118–134.