Informal Helping and Subsequent Health and Well-Being in Older U.S. Adults

Julia S. Nakamura1, Matthew T. Lee2,3, Tyler J. VanderWeele2,4,5, Eric S. Kim1,2,6
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
3Institute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, USA
4Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
5Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
6Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Tóm tắt

Growing evidence suggests that informal helping (unpaid volunteering not coordinated by an organization or institution) is associated with improved health and well-being outcomes. However, studies have not investigated whether changes in informal helping are associated with subsequent health and well-being. This study evaluated if changes in informal helping (between t0;2006/2008 and t1;2010/2012) were associated with 35 indicators of physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health and well-being (at t2;2014/2016) using data from 12,998 participants in the Health and Retirement study — a national cohort of US adults aged > 50. Over the four-year follow-up period, informal helping ≥ 100 (versus 0) hours/year was associated with a 32% lower mortality risk (95% CI [0.54, 0.86]), and improved physical health (e.g., 20% reduced risk of stroke (95% CI [0.65, 0.98])), health behaviors (e.g., 11% increased likelihood of frequent physical activity (95% CI [1.04, 1.20])), and psychosocial outcomes (e.g., higher purpose in life (β = 0.15, 95% CI [0.07, 0.22])). However, there was little evidence of associations with various other outcomes. In secondary analyses, this study adjusted for formal volunteering and a variety of social factors (e.g., social network factors, receiving social support, and social participation) and results were largely unchanged. Encouraging informal helping may improve various aspects of individuals’ health and well-being and also promote societal well-being.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA. Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56(1):365–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.

Burr JA, Mutchler JE, Han SH. Volunteering and health in later life. In: Ferraro F, Carr D, editors. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Elsevier; 2021:303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815970-5.00019-X.

Einolf CJ, Prouteau L, Nezhina T, Ibrayeva AR. Informal, unorganized volunteering. In: The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016:223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_10.

Dean J. Informal volunteering, inequality, and illegitimacy. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2022;51(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211034580.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population ageing 2019. 2020. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf.

Kubzansky LD, Huffman JC, Boehm JK, et al. Positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(12):1382–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.042.

VanderWeele TJ. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(31):8148–56. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114.

Burr JA, Han S, Lee HJ, Tavares JL, Mutchler JE. Health benefits associated with three helping behaviors: Evidence for incident cardiovascular disease. J Gerontol Ser B. 2018;73(3):492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx082.

Han SH, Tavares JL, Evans M, Saczynski J, Burr JA. Social activities, incident cardiovascular disease, and mortality: Health behaviors mediation. J Aging Health. 2017;29(2):268–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316635565.

Qu H, Konrath S, Poulin M. Which types of giving are associated with reduced mortality risk among older adults? Pers Individl Dif. 2020;154:109668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109668.

Kahana E, Bhatta T, Lovegreen LD, Kahana B, Midlarsky E. Altruism, helping, and volunteering: Pathways to well-being in late life. J Aging Health. 2013;25(1):159–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312469665.

Matthews K, Nazroo J. The impact of volunteering and its characteristics on well-being after state pension age: Longitudinal evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Gerontol Ser B. 2021;76(3):632–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa146.

Krekel C, De Neve JE, Fancourt D, Layard R. A local community course that raises wellbeing and pro-sociality: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021;188:322–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.05.021.

Wahrendorf M, Ribet C, Zins M, Siegrist J. Social productivity and depressive symptoms in early old age–results from the GAZEL study. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(3):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802120805.

Li Y, Ferraro KF. Volunteering and depression in later life: Social benefit or selection processes? J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600106.

VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB, Chen Y. Outcome-wide longitudinal designs for causal inference: A new template for empirical studies. Statist Sci. 2020;35(3). https://doi.org/10.1214/19-STS728.

Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Human aging: Usual and successful. Science. 1987;237(4811):143–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3299702.

Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Hall JS, editors. Handbook of adult resilience. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 2010.

Aldwin CM, Igarashi H. Successful, optimal, and resilient aging: A psychosocial perspective. In: Lichtenberg PA, Mast BT, Carpenter BD, Loebach Wetherell J, editors. APA handbook of clinical geropsychology, Vol. 1: History and status of the field and perspectives on aging. American Psychological Association; 2015:331–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/14458-014.

Depp CA, Jeste DV. Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(1):6–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc.

Sonnega A, Faul JD, Ofstedal MB, Langa KM, Phillips JW, Weir DR. Cohort profile: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):576–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu067.

Smith J, Ryan L, Fisher GG, Sonnega A, Weir D. Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire. 2017;2006–2016:72.

Johnson SS. The art of health promotion: Ideas for improving health outcomes. Am J Health Promot. 2017;31(2):163–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117691705.

Jenkins KR, Ofstedal MB, Weir D. Documentation of health behaviours and risk factors measured in the Health and Retirement Study. 2008. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/dr-010.pdf.

Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc. 1961;56(293):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090.

VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB. Some desirable properties of the Bonferroni correction: Is the Bonferroni correction really so bad? Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(3):617–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy250.

VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: Introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2607.

Harel O, Mitchell EM, Perkins NJ, et al. Multiple imputation for incomplete data in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(3):576–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx349.

Terry R, Townley G. Exploring the role of social support in promoting community integration: An integrated literature review. Am J Community Psychol. 2019;64(3):509–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12336.

Gottlieb BH. The development and application of a classification scheme of informal helping behaviours. Can J Behav Sci. 1978:10(2):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081539.

Lauzier-Jobin F, Houle J. A comparison of formal and informal help in the context of mental health recovery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022;68(4):729–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640211004988.

Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987;4(4):497–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407587044007.

Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR. Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):127–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127.

Poulin MJ, Brown SL, Dillard AJ, Smith DM. Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):1649–55. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300876.

Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6):843–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4.

Age-Friendly World. The WHO age-friendly cities framework. https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/age-friendly-cities-framework/.

Emlet CA, Moceri JT. The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/173247.