Individual Accessibility Revisited: Implications for Geographical Analysis in the Twenty‐first Century

Geographical Analysis - Tập 35 Số 4 - Trang 341-353 - 2003
Mei‐Po Kwan1, Joe Weber2
1Associate Professor of geography in the Department of Geography, The Ohio State University. E-mail: [email protected]
2Department of Geography, University of Alabama. Email: [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Analytical methods for evaluating accessibility have been based on a spatial logic through which the impedance of distance shapes mobility and urban form through processes of locational and travel decision making. These methods are not suitable for understanding individual experiences because of recent changes in the processes underlying contemporary urbanism and the increasing importance of information and communications technologies (ICTs) in people's daily lives. In this paper we argue that analysis of individual accessibility can no longer ignore the complexities and opportunities brought forth by these changes. Further, we argue that the effect of distance on the spatial structure of contemporary cities and human spatial behavior has become much more complicated than what has been conceived in conventional urban models and concepts of accessibility. We suggest that the methods and measures formulated around the mid‐twentieth century are becoming increasingly inadequate for grappling with the complex relationships among urban form, mobility, and individual accessibility. We consider some new possibilities for modeling individual accessibility and their implications for geographical analysis in the twenty‐first century.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.4159/harvard.9780674730854

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00279.x

10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00045-4

Burgess E. W., 1925, The City, 47

Burns L. D., 1979, Transportation, Temporal, and Spatial Components of Accessibility

10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01102.x

Davis M., 1998, Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster

10.1111/1467-8306.00084

10.1023/A:1005293330869

10.1068/b12811

10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_11

10.1016/0016-7185(91)90003-9

10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01933.x

Fishman R., 1990, Megalopolis Unbound, The Wilson Quarterly, 14, 25

10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_5

Garreau J., 1991, Edge City: Life on the New Frontier

10.1111/0004-5608.00114

Gillespie A., 2000, Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies, 229

10.1068/a210145

10.1016/0166-0462(91)90032-I

10.1068/a160807

10.1191/030913298671334137

Green M., 1996, Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment, 41

10.1068/b100219

10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x

10.1086/261107

Handy S., 1992, Regional versus Local Accessibility: Neo‐Traditional Development and Its Implications for Non‐Work Travel, Built Environment, 18, 253

10.1068/a291175

10.4324/9780203397411

10.1177/000271624524200103

10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_9

10.1068/a210221

Henderson D. K., 1996, Impacts of Center‐Based Telecommuting on Travel and Emissions: Analysis of the Puget Sound Demonstration Project, Transportation Research, 1, 29

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00277.x

10.1080/00420989120080071

Hoyt H., 1939, The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities

10.1080/00221347308981301

Janelle D. G., 1995, The Geography of Urban Transportation, 407

10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0

Jones K., 1996, Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment, 79

10.1007/s101090300104

Kitamura R., 1990, In Developments in Dynamic and Activity‐Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, 145

10.1191/030913298668331585

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x

10.1111/0033-0124.00158

10.1111/j.1944-8287.1999.tb00126.x

10.1007/s101090050034

10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00125.x

10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_14

10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00017-6

10.1068/b2560

10.2747/0272-3638.23.5.471

Kwan M.‐P., 1998, Network‐Based Constraints‐Oriented Choice Set Formation Using GIS, Geographical Systems, 5, 139

Kwan M.‐P., 2003, Spatially Integrated Social Science

10.1007/s101090300107

10.1080/01972240290075084

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00385.x

Lenntorp B., 1976, Paths in Space‐Time Environments: A Time‐Geographic Study of the Movement Possibilities of Individuals

Lenntorp B., 1978, Human Activity and Time Geography, 162

Marshall A., 2000, How Cities Work: Suburbs, Sprawl, and the Roads Not Taken

Michelson W., 1985, From Sun to Sun: Daily Obligations and Community Structure in the Lives of Employed Women and Their Families

10.1111/gean.1999.31.1.187

10.1016/0191-2607(90)90060-J

10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00010-8

Muth R. F., 1969, Cities and Housing: The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use

Nie N., 2000, Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report

10.1080/136588100240976

10.1007/BF00186566

10.1068/a110299

10.1016/0016-7185(87)90012-1

10.1177/089443930001800411

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00952.x

10.1068/b250345

10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.334

10.1086/261844

10.1080/136588198241581

UCLA‐CCP., 2003, The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future

Vance J. E., 1964, Geography and Urban Evolution in the San Francisco Bay Area

10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00010-2

10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4

10.1080/00420989320081681

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00280.x

10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00276.x

10.2747/0272-3638.14.3.277

10.1068/b2691

Weber J.(2001).Evaluating the Effects of Context and Scale on Individual Accessibility: A Multilevel Approach Ph.D. diss. Department of Geography Ohio State University.

10.1007/s101090300103

10.1111/0033-0124.00328

WeberJ. andM.‐P.Kwan(2003).Evaluating the Effects of Geographic Contexts on Individual Accessibility: A Multilevel Approach.Urban Geography (forthcoming).