Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning

Baker, 1997, Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 174, 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.x

Bangert-Drowns, 1991, The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61, 213, 10.3102/00346543061002213

Black, 1998, Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7, 10.1080/0969595980050102

Bloxham, 2004, Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 721, 10.1080/0260293042000227254

Boud, 2000, Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society, Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151, 10.1080/713695728

Chiu, 2008, Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 415, 10.1080/10508400802224830

Cho, 2008, Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: an empirical investigation, Communications of the ACM, 51, 83, 10.1145/1325555.1325571

Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 20, 328, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006

Cho, 2007, Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline, Computers and Education, 48, 409, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004

Cho, 2006, Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts, Written Communication, 23, 260, 10.1177/0741088306289261

Coleman, 1998, Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science, The Journal of Learning Sciences, 7, 387, 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672059

Falchikov, 1995, Improving feedback to and from students, 157

Falchikov, N. (1996, July). Improving learning through critical peer feedback and reflection. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference 1996: Different approaches: Theory and practice in Higher Education, Perth, Australia.

Falchikov, 2000, Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks, Review of Educational Research, 70, 287, 10.3102/00346543070003287

Gibbs, 2004, Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3

Gielen, 2010, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum, British Educational Research Journal, 36, 143, 10.1080/01411920902894070

Goldstein, 1995

Graham, 2007, A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

Hanrahan, 2001, Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the students' views, Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 53, 10.1080/07294360123776

Kali, 2008, Assessing the assessors: added value in web-based multi-cycle peer assessment in higher education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 3, 10.1142/S1793206808000434

Karegianes, 1980, The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth grade students, Journal of Educational Research, 73, 203, 10.1080/00220671.1980.10885236

Kim, M. (2005). The effects of the assessor and assessee's roles on preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness, performance, and attitude in a technology-related design task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

Kluger, 1996, The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254, 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Magin, 2001, Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: how reliable are they?, Studies in Higher Education, 26, 287, 10.1080/03075070120076264

Miller, 2003, The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 383, 10.1080/0260293032000066218

Mory, 2003, Feedback research revisited, 745

Narciss, 2008, Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks, 125

Narciss, 2006, Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction, Learning and Instruction, 16, 310, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003

Nelson, 1993, Peer response groups: do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?, TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135, 10.2307/3586965

Orsmond, 2002, The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 309, 10.1080/0260293022000001337

Prins, 2006, Feedback for general practitioners in training: quality, styles, and preferences, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 289, 10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z

Rada, 2002, Patterns in student–student commenting, IEEE Transactions on Education, 45, 262, 10.1109/TE.2002.1024619

SAS Institute, 2004

Searby, 1997, An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the school of music, Kingston University, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 371, 10.1080/0260293970220402

Slavin, 1989, Research on cooperative learning: an international perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 231, 10.1080/0031383890330401

Sluijsmans, 2002, Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443, 10.1080/0260293022000009311

Snijders, 1999

Strijbos, 2010, Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?, Learning and Instruction, 20, 291, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008

Topping, 1998, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249

Tsui, 2000, Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9

Van den Berg, 2006, Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 19, 10.1080/02602930500262346

Van Gennip, 2010, Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: the role of interpersonal variables and conceptions, Learning and Instruction, 20, 280, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010

Van Steendam, 2010, The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL, Learning and Instruction, 20, 316, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009

Van Zundert, 2010, Effective peer assesment processes: research findings and future directions, Learning and Instruction, 20, 270, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004

Webb, 1991, Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366, 10.2307/749186

Webb, 2003, Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0

Yang, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004