Implications of a Data-Driven Approach to Treatment with Growth Hormone in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency and Turner Syndrome

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 11 - Trang 237-249 - 2013
Stefan Kaspers1, Michael B. Ranke2, Donald Han3, Jane Loftus1, Hartmut Wollmann1, Anders Lindberg4, Mathieu Roelants5, Joris Kleintjens6
1Pfizer Ltd., Endocrine Care, Tadworth, UK
2Paediatric Endocrinology Section, Children’s Hospital, University of Tuebingen, Tubingen, Germany
3Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, USA
4KIGS/KIMS/ACROSTUDY Medical Outcomes, Pfizer Health AB, Sollentuna, Sweden
5Laboratory of Anthropogenetics, Free University, Brussels, Belgium
6Quintiles Consulting, Hawthorne, USA

Tóm tắt

Response to growth hormone (GH) therapy may vary between individual patients. Therefore the use of GH in children should be closely monitored to avoid over, under, or ineffective treatment regimens. The treatment response can be evaluated using growth prediction models. In an effort to improve the accuracy of these prediction models, Ranke et al. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(3):1229–37) proposed a novel ‘data-driven’ approach based on a quantitative analysis of a large cohort of patients from the Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) treated with Genotropin (human growth hormone). This model allows physicians to predict and evaluate the level of growth response and responsiveness for their patients so they can adapt treatment accordingly. By comparing the actually observed and the predicted growth response the ability of an individual to respond to GH (responsiveness) can be estimated and further treatment can be adapted accordingly To determine the potential population level reduction in the amount of GH used and impact on height outcome of using this data-driven approach to guide treatment decisions, compared to conventional, ‘experience-based’ GH treatment in prepubertal patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or Turner syndrome (TS). A model was developed to study the height outcome and the total amount of GH used in the presence or absence of data-driven treatment decisions. The proportion of patients for whom height outcome could be improved or GH use could be reduced (i.e. for low compliance, high or low responder) was estimated using the KIGS cohort. The analysis assumed that this segmentation allows physicians to tailor dosage to the individual patient’s needs or even to discontinue therapy when it is not effective. The analysis used a 4-year time horizon, with Germany as an example country, but results are extendable to other countries. Only the total amount of GH used was included, and effects were defined as the height outcome after 4 years. The analysis estimated that an evidence-driven approach may reduce the total amount of GH utilized by 7.0 % over 4 years for the treatment of short stature in prepubertal patients with GHD and TS in Germany. Despite the reduction in drug use the average growth outcomes remained unaffected with the new treatment approach. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results are robust. Our analysis showed that using a data-driven approach to guide treatment decisions for children with GHD or TS is estimated to result in efficiencies in the amount of GH used, without reducing the average growth in the population.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bang P, Bjerknes R, Dahlgren J, et al. A comparison of different definitions of growth response in short prepubertal children treated with growth hormone. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;75(5):335–45. Werther G. Growth hormone measurements versus auxology in treatment decisions: the Australian experience. J Pediatr. 1996;128(5 Pt 2):S47–51. Werther GA, Wang M, Cowell CT. An auxology-based growth hormone program: update on the Australian experience. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2003;16(Suppl 3):613–8. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, KIGS International Board. Observed and predicted growth responses in prepubertal children with growth disorders: guidance of growth hormone treatment by empirical variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1229–37. Bang P, Ahmed SF, Argente J, Backeljauw P, Bettendorf M, Bona G, Coutant R, Rosenfeld RG, Walenkamp MJ, Savage MO. Identification and management of poor response to growth-promoting therapy in children with short stature. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(2):169–81. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Brosz M, Kaspers S, Loftus J, Wollmann H, et al. Accurate long-term prediction of height during the first four years of growth hormone treatment in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency or Turner syndrome. Horm Res Paediatr. 2012;78(1):8–17. Bakker B, Frane J, Anhalt H, Lippe B, Rosenfeld RG. Height velocity targets from the national cooperative growth study for first-year growth hormone responses in short children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(2):352–7. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Derivation and validation of a mathematical model for predicting the response to exogenous recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in prepubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency. KIGS International Board. Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(4):1174–83. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Prediction of long-term response to recombinant human growth hormone in Turner syndrome: development and validation of mathematical models. KIGS International Board. Kabi International Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4212–8. Pfizer Limited. Summary of Product Characteristics, Date of revision of the text: March 2012, electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC). http://www.medicines.org.uk. Accessed Dec 2012. Ranke MB, Lindberg A. Predicting growth in response to growth hormone treatment. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2009;19(1):1–11. Reiter EO, Price DA, Wilton P, Albertsson-Wikland K, Ranke MB. Effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on the near-final height of 1258 patients with idiopathic GH deficiency: analysis of a large international database. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(6):2047–54. Golay A. Pharmacoeconomic aspects of poor adherence: can better adherence reduce healthcare costs? J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):594–608. Roter DL, Hall JA, Merisca R, Nordstrom B, Cretin D, Svarstad B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 1998;36(8):1138–61. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Human growth hormone (somatropin) for the treatment of growth failure in children (review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 42), Technology Appraisal 188, 2010. Department of Health and Aging, Australian Government. Guidelines for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Growth Hormone Program. http://www.health.gov.au/hgh. Accessed Sep 2010. Wilson TA, Rose SR, Cohen P, Rogol AD, Backeljauw P, Brown R, Hardin DS, Kemp SF, Lawson M, Radovick S, Rosenthal SM, Silverman L, Speiser P, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrinology Society Drug and Therapeutics Committee. Update of guidelines for the use of growth hormone in children: the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrinology Society Drug and Therapeutics Committee. J Pediatr. 2003;143(4):415–21. Bryant J, Cave C, Mihaylova B, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of growth hormone in children: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(18):1–168. Takeda A, Cooper K, Bird A, et al. Recombinant human growth hormone for the treatment of growth disorders in children: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(42):1–209. iii–iv. Joshi AV, Munro V, Russell MW. Cost-utility of somatropin (rDNA origin) in the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in children. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(2):351–7. Kapoor RR, Burke SA, Sparrow SE, et al. Monitoring of concordance in growth hormone therapy. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:147–8. Cutfield WS, Derraik JG, Gunn AJ, et al. Non-compliance with growth hormone treatment in children is common and impairs linear growth. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16223. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Martin DD, et al. The mathematical model for total pubertal growth in idiopathic growth hormone (GH) deficiency suggests a moderate role of GH dose. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4748–53. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Albertsson-Wikland K, Wilton P, Price DA, Reiter EO. Increased response, but lower responsiveness, to growth hormone (GH) in very young children (aged 0–3 years) with idiopathic GH deficiency: analysis of data from KIGS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1966–71. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Cowell CT, et al. Prediction of response to growth hormone treatment in short children born small for gestational age: analysis of data from KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:125–31. Ranke M, Guilbaud O. Growth hormone levels in response to stimulation tests and responsiveness to growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature. Kabi Pharm Int Growth Study. 1992;8(1):34–41.