Impacts of climate, disturbance and topography on distribution of herbaceous cover in Southern California chaparral: Insights from a remote‐sensing method

Diversity and Distributions - Tập 24 Số 4 - Trang 497-508 - 2018
Isaac Park1,2, Jennifer Hooper3, James M. Flegal4, G. Darrel Jenerette1,2
1Center for Conservation Biology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
2Department of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
3USDA-Forest Service, Angeles National Forest, Arcadia, CA, USA
4Department of Statistics, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractAimWhile chaparral communities have historically been considered resistant to invasion and type conversion into grasslands, interacting global changes such as increased drought and anthropogenic disturbance may have reduced this resistance. Existing monitoring methods are not well‐suited to evaluate the distribution of invasive herbs and grasses within chaparral at regional scales. In this study, we determine the extent of invasions by forbs and grasses into formerly chaparral vegetation and evaluate contributions of moisture, disturbance and anthropogenic activity and topography to the distribution of herbaceous cover throughout chaparral‐dominated communities.LocationThe Angeles National Forest (ANF), California, USA.MethodsWe developed a remote‐sensing method to estimate the distribution of herbaceous cover within chaparral by leveraging intra‐annual phenological differences in normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) between herbaceous forbs and grasses and evergreen shrublands using Landsat remote‐sensing imagery. The distribution of herbaceous cover was then related to multiple spatially explicit variables describing individual and interactive effects of local moisture availability and anthropogenic disturbance.ResultsHerbaceous cover represents approximately 31% of the ANF within the elevation range typically dominated by chaparral. Disturbance‐related and anthropogenic factors explained 17% of observed variation, while differences in moisture availability explained 47% of observed variation in herbaceous cover and were associated with increased invasive cover.Main conclusionsLandscapes historically dominated by chaparral may exhibit high degrees of herbaceous cover. While fire frequency and other anthropogenic disturbances are likely the primary catalyst for invasion of chaparral by herbaceous species, this study shows that moisture availability is a more important factor in determining which locations are successfully invaded. These results indicate that chaparral vulnerability to invasion in southern California may increase in the next century due to reduced precipitation associated with projected climate change.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen E. B., 2005, Planning for biodiversity: Bringing research and management together. Gen. Trch. Rep. PSW‐GTR‐195, 79

Boyko H., 1945, On forest types of the semi‐arid areas at lower altitudes, Palestine Journal of Botany, Rehovot Series, 5, 1

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01232.x

10.1007/s10661-011-2228-y

Bytnerowicz A., 1995, Nitrogen deposition in California forests: A review, Environmental Pollution, 902, 127

10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1

10.5194/bg-7-907-2010

Cook D. R., 2009, Applied regression including computing and graphics

1968 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Berkeley CA E. S. Corbett R. P. Crouse U.S.F.S.R.P. Psw‐48 Rainfall interception by annual grass and chaparral; losses compared 1 12

10.1155/2014/923027

10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.008

10.1080/15481603.2013.778559

D'Antonio C. M., 2001, Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: A California perspective, Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, 2, 233

10.1525/california/9780520252202.003.0006

10.3398/064.073.0105

10.1029/WR020i011p01643

10.1007/BF00379344

10.1007/BF00054665

10.3732/ajb.89.5.820

Debano L. F., 1984, Enhancement of riparian vegetation following shrub control in Arizona chaparral, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39, 317

10.2737/PSW-GTR-104

English D. B. K., 2002, Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring Process: Research Method Documentation, 14, 10.2737/SRS-GTR-57

10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09729.x

10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.034

10.2307/3237291

10.1111/j.1654-109X.2002.tb00543.x

10.1111/1467-9671.00084

Franklin J., 2000, Multi‐attribute vegetation maps of forest service lands in California supporting resource management decisions, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66, 1209

10.1007/BF00379955

Fry J., 2011, Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the coterminous United States, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 77, 858

10.2307/1942049

1994 H. Gordon T. C. White Usda Forest Service & Pacific Southwest Region Ecological guide to southern California chaparral plant series 1 162

10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.09.002

Haidinger T. L., 1993, Role of high fire frequency in destruction of mixed chaparral, Madroño, 40, 141

Hamilton J. G., 1997, Changing perceptions of pre‐European grasslands in California, Madroño, 44, 311

10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7

10.1029/WR007i001p00071

Homer C. G., 2015, Completion of the 2011 national land cover database for the conterminous United States ‐ Representing a decade of land cover change information, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81, 345

10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5

Jacobsen A. L. &Davis S. D.(2004).Fire frequency impacts non‐sprouting chaparral shrubs in the Santa Monica mountains of southern California. 10th MEDECOS Conference (ed by Arianoutsou and Papanastasis). Rhodes Greece.

10.2136/sssaj2004.8760

10.1007/978-94-009-4822-8_7

10.2307/3236001

Keeley J. E., 2001, Proceedings of the invasive species workshop: The role of fire in the control and spread of invasive species. Fire conference 2000: The First National Congress on fire ecology, prevention, and management, 81

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00339.x

10.1890/04-1222

Keeley J. E., 2012, Fire in mediterranean ecosystems

10.1007/s00442-012-2253-8

10.1890/04-1005

10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00200.x

10.1890/13-1313.1

Kummerow J., 1985, Post‐fire seedling establishment of Adenostema fasciculatum and Ceonothus greggii in southern California chaparral, Madroño, 32, 148

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00086.x

10.1007/s00442-005-0259-1

10.1071/WF10099

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01299.x

10.1109/LGRS.2005.857030

10.1080/01431160410001726067

10.1371/journal.pone.0110637

10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0515:FBANSA]2.0.CO;2

10.1525/9780520934337

10.1071/WF9950013

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2001.tb02615.x

2009 K. Myers T. Stoughton K. Walker J. Zylstra P.S.R. Usda Forest Service Burned Area Emergency Response Specialist Report: Noxious and invasive non‐native weeds specialist report and noxious weed detection survey plan 1 13

National Assessment Synthesis Team, 2000, Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate variability and change

Orme A. R., 1970, The effect of vegetation conversion and flood discharge on stream channel geometry: A case of southern California watersheds, Proceedings of the American Association of Geographers, 2, 65

10.1353/pcg.1971.0004

Paddock W. A. S., 2013, Factors determining mortality of adult chaparral shrubs in an extreme drought year in California, Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, 31, 49, 10.5642/aliso.20133101.08

Parker T. V., 2016, Ecosystems of California, 479

Pase C. P., 1982, Californian (coastal) chaparral, Desert Plants, 4, 91

10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d0

10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00142-0

10.1525/california/9780520252202.003.0007

2013 H. D. Safford K. Van de Water C. Clark USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region and The Nature Conservancy‐California California Fire Return Interval Departure (FRID) map 2012 version

10.2307/1930518

10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.015

10.1111/ddi.12076

10.1016/0016-7061(94)00034-8

10.1371/journal.pone.0156720

Warbington R., 2000, USDA Forest Service, 1

Warbington R., 2002, USDA Forest Service, 1

10.1071/BT96030

10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.029

10.2136/vzj2004.1007

10.2307/1937204

10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00098.x