Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”

European Journal of Hybrid Imaging - Tập 4 - Trang 1-6 - 2020
Thiago V. M. Lima1,2, Ujwal Bhure1, Maria de Sol Pérez Lago1, Yannick Thali1, Savo Matijasevic1, Justus Roos1, Klaus Strobel1
1Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
2Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Novel reconstruction algorithms, such as xSPECT Bone, are gaining more and more importance in Nuclear Medicine. With xSPECT Bone, the reconstructed emission image is enhanced by the information obtained in the corresponding CT image. The CT defines tissue classes according to the Hounsfield units. In the iterative reconstruction, each tissue class is handled separately in the forward projection step, and all together in the back projection step. As a consequence, xSPECT Bone reconstruction generates images with improved boundary delineation and better anatomic representation of tracer activity. Applying this technique, however, showed that artefacts may occur, when no uptake regions, like metal implants, exhibit fictitious uniform tracer uptake. Due to limitations in spatial resolution in gamma cameras, the xSPECT Bone reconstructed image resulted in spill-out activity from surrounding high uptake region being uniformly distributed over the metal implants. This new technology of xSPECT Bone reconstruction in general enhances the image quality of SPECT/CT; however, the potential introduction of specific artefacts which inadvertently come along with this new technology and their frequency have not yet been addressed in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to identify and characterize these specific metal artefacts (the so-called shining metal artefact) in order to reduce false positives and avoid potentially misdiagnosing loosened or infected implants. In this work, we report five cases imaged with bone SPECT/CT of 5 anatomical regions (foot, elbow, spine, shoulder, ribs and knee). All cases demonstrated “shining metal artefacts” in xSPECT Bone reconstruction. While xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm significantly improves image quality for the diagnosis of bone and joint disorders with SPECT/CT, specific “shining metal artefacts” caused by the xSPECT Bone have to be recognized in order to avoid image misinterpretation suggesting metallic implant loosening or possible infection. The simultaneous analysis of conventionally reconstructed SPECT images (for Siemens the Flash3D reconstruction) helps to avoid misinterpretation of potential artefacts introduced by xSPECT Bone reconstruction.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Duncan I, Ingold N (2018) The clinical value of xSPECT/CT Bone versus SPECT/CT. A prospective comparison of 200 scans. European journal of hybrid imaging. 2(1):1–12 Gnanasegaran G, Barwick T, Adamson K, Mohan H, Sharp D, Fogelman I (2009) Multislice SPECT/CT in benign and malignant bone disease: when the ordinary turns into the extraordinary. Semin Nucl Med. 39(6):431–442 Gnanasegaran G, Paycha F, Strobel K, van der Bruggen W, Kampen WU, Kuwert T et al (2018) Bone SPECT/CT in postoperative spine. Semin Nucl Med. 48(5):410–424 Hudyana H, Maes A, Vandenberghe T, Fidlers L, Sathekge M, Nicolai D et al (2016) Accuracy of bone SPECT/CT for identifying hardware loosening in patients who underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screws. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 43(2):349–354 Hutton BF (2011) Recent advances in iterative reconstruction for clinical SPECT/PET and CT. Acta Oncologica. 50(6):851–858 Kampen WU, Westphal F, Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kuwert T, Van der Bruggen W et al (2018) SPECT/CT in postoperative foot and ankle pain. Semin Nucl Med. 48(5):454–468 Murer AM, Hirschmann MT, Amsler F, Rasch H, Huegli RW (2020) Bone SPECT/CT has excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of loosening and patellofemoral problems after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 28(4):1029–1035 Romer W, Olk A, Hennig FF, Bautz W, Kuwert T (2005) Assessment of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement with 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/spiral-CT hybrid imaging. Nuklearmedizin. 44(6):N58–N60 Scharf S (2009) SPECT/CT imaging in general orthopedic practice. Semin Nucl Med. 39(5):293–307 Van den Wyngaert T, Palli SR, Imhoff RJ, Hirschmann MT (2018a) Cost-effectiveness of bone SPECT/CT in painful total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 59(11):1742–1750 Van den Wyngaert T, Paycha F, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W et al (2018b) SPECT/CT in postoperative painful hip arthroplasty. Semin Nucl Med. 48(5):425–438 Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK et al (2016) The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 43(9):1723–1738 van der Bruggen W, Hirschmann MT, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, Gnanasegaran G et al (2018) SPECT/CT in the postoperative painful knee. Semin Nucl Med. 48(5):439–453 Vija AH (2013) Introduction to xSPECT* technology: evolving multi-modal SPECT to become context-based and quantitative. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Molecular Imaging, White Paper