Impact of fashion braces on oral health related quality of life: a web-based cross-sectional study

Zaki Hakami1, Haegeun Chung2, Seham Moafa3, Hadia Nasser3, Hajar Sowadi3, Safeena Abdul Khader Saheb1, Ahmed M. Bokhari4, Nina K. Anderson5
1Division of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
2Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, USA
3College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
4Division of Dental Public Health, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
5Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Medicine, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Orthodontic braces have become symbols of wealth and fashion accessories in some parts of the world. However, there is a scarcity of information about the effects of fashion braces on various aspects of quality of life. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the effects of fashion braces on oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out with data collection from a Google form questionnaire distributed in Saudi Arabia via various forms of social media over a period of 4 months. OHRQoL was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. The fashion braces group included respondents who had braces installed for fashion purposes only. Therapeutic braces group included subjects who were wearing braces to treat any malocclusion problems. Control group included subjects who did not have any kind of braces. People who had previously completed orthodontic treatments were excluded from the study. The negative impacts were divided into seven domains and a total OHIP score was calculated. Statistical analyses and data illustration were performed with SPSS v25 (IBM, NY). Results A total of 1141 people voluntarily participated in the study. More than 60% of the participants were in the control group while 33.7% had conventional braces for therapeutic reasons and 3.4% had fashion braces. Sociodemographic distributions varied among the groups, with the majority of the fashion braces group having education below the university level and family incomes less than average. There were significant group differences in OHIP domains. Physical pain was the most frequently reported complaint by all subjects and was the highest in the therapeutic braces group. People with therapeutic braces reported significantly higher functional limitation and physical disability than the controls. Fashion braces group reported significantly lower psychological discomfort and disability, social disability and handicap compared to control groups. Conclusions The illustrated effects of fashion braces on OHRQoL suggest the need to study the role of social media and educate the public on the use of braces to minimize the negative effects experienced by individuals.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;11:3–11.

O’Brien K, Kay L, Fox D, Mandall N. Assessing oral health outcomes for orthodontics – measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health. 1998;15:22–6.

Sischo L, Broder HL. Oral health-related quality of life. What, why, how and future implications. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1264–70.

De Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and oral health related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod. 2004;31:20–7.

Choi SH, Cha JY, Lee KJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Changes in psychological health, subjective food intake ability and oral health-related quality of life during orthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44:860–9.

Işiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçin S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dento Orthop. 2006;129:8–16.

Lee R, Hwang S, Lim H, Cha JY, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Treatment satisfaction and its influencing factors among adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dento Orthop. 2018;153:808–17.

Abdul Wahab RM, Hasan SK, Yamin NEM, Ibrahim Z. Awareness of fake braces usage among Y-generations. J Int Dent Med Res. 2019;12:663–6.

Al Habashneh R, Khader YS, Salameh S. Use of the Arabic version of oral health impact profile-14 to evaluate the impact of periodontal disease on oral health-related quality of life among Jordanian adults. J Oral Sci. 2012;54:113–20.

Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:284–90.

Nasir SH, Abu Bakar N, Samad R. Elemental and microstructural analysis of fake, real and standard orthodontic brackets. J Phys. 2018;1073:052002.

Zhang M, McGrath C, Hagg U. Changes in oral health related quality of life during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133:25–9.

Zhou Y, Zheng M, Lin J, Wang Y, Ni ZY. Self-ligating brackets and their impact on Oral health-related quality of life in Chinese adolescence patients: a longitudinal prospective study. Sci World J. 2014;2014:352031.

Agou S, Locker S, Muirhead V, Tompson B, Streiner DL. Does psychological well-being influence oral-health-related quality of life reports in children receiving orthodontic treatment? Am J Orthod Dento Orthop. 2011;139:369–77.

Wide U, Hakeberg M. Oral health-related quality of life, measured using the five-item version of the oral health impact profile, in relation to socio-economic status: a population survey in Sweden. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126:41–5.

Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS. Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:221–30.

Gomes AP, da Silva EG, Gonçalves SH, Huhtala MF, Martinho FC, Gonçalves SE, et al. Relationship between patient’s education level and knowledge on oral health preventive measures. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2015;1:1–7.

Tsakos G, Sheiham A, Ilffe S, Kharicha K, Harari D, Swift CG, Gillman G, Stuck AE. The impact of educational level on oral health-related quality of life in older people in London. Euro J Oral Sci. 2009;117:286–292.