If You’re a Rawlsian, How Come You’re So Close to Utilitarianism and Intuitionism? A Critique of Daniels’s Accountability for Reasonableness

Gabriele Badano1
1Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, and Girton College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ashcroft, R. (2008). Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: A polemic. Public Health Ethics, 1, 3–9.

Bognar, G., & Hirose, I. (2014). The ethics of health care rationing: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

Daniels, N. (1999). Enabling democratic deliberation: How managed care organizations ought to make decisions about coverage for new technologies. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 198–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Daniels, N. (2008). Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (2008). Setting limits fairly: Learning how to share resources (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ferner, R., & McDowell, S. (2006). How NICE may be outflanked. BMJ, 332, 1268–1271.

Friedman, A. (2008). Beyond accountability for reasonableness. Bioethics, 22, 101–112.

Goddard, M., Hauck, K., & Smith, P. (2006). Priority setting in health—A political economy perspective. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1, 79–90.

Hasman, A., & Holm, S. (2005). Accountability for reasonableness: Opening the black box of process. Health Care Analysis, 13, 261–273.

Hirose, I. (2013). Aggregation and the separateness of persons. Utilitas, 25, 182–205.

Kamm, F. (2007). Intricate ethics: Rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Landwehr, C. (2013). Procedural justice and democratic institutional design in health-care priority-setting. Contemporary Political Theory, 12, 296–317.

Mechanic, D. (1995). Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing. BMJ, 310, 1655–1659.

Mechanic, D. (1997). Muddling through elegantly: Finding the proper balance in rationing. Health Affairs, 16, 83–92.

Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

NICE. (2008). Social value judgements: Principles for the development of NICE guidance (2nd ed.). London: NICE.

NICE. (2014). Value-based assessment of health technologies: Consultation paper. London: NICE.

Norcross, A. (2009). Two dogmas of deontology: Aggregation, rights, and the separateness of persons. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26, 76–95.

Rawlins, M., Barnett, D., & Stevens, A. (2010). Pharmacoeconomics: NICE’s approach to decision-making. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacolology, 70, 346–349.

Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Richardson, H. (1990). Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, 279–310.

Rid, A. (2009). Justice and procedure: How does ‘accountability for reasonableness’ result in fair limit-setting decisions? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 12–16.

Robinson, R. (1999). Limits to rationality: Economics, economists and priority setting. Health Policy, 49, 13–26.

Scanlon, T. (1982). Contractualism and utilitarianism. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 103–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Syrett, K. (2007). Law, legitimacy and the rationing of health care: A contextual and comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Voorhoeve, A. (2014). How should we aggregate relevant claims? Ethics, 125, 64–87.

Williams, I., Dickinson, H., & Robinson, S. (2012). Rationing in health care: The theory and practice of priority setting. Bristol: Policy Press.