Identity salience moderates processing of group-relevant information

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology - Tập 46 - Trang 441-444 - 2010
Angela T. Maitner1, Diane M. Mackie2, Heather M. Claypool3, Richard J. Crisp4
1Department of International Studies, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
2Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
3Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States
4School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NP, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvaro, 1996, Cognitive responses to minority- or majority-based communications: Factors that underlie minority influence, British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 105, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01086.x Alvaro, 1997, Indirect minority influence. Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.949 Brown, 2000, Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges, European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745, 10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O Cacioppo, 1986, Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032 Chaiken, 1980, Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752, 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 Chaiken, 1989, Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context, 212 Crano, 1998, The context/comparison model of social influence. Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change, 175 David, 1996, Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01091.x Fujioka, 2005, Emotional TV viewing and minority audience. How Mexican Americans process and evaluate TV news about in-group members, Communication Research, 32, 566, 10.1177/0093650205279210 James, 1890, Vols. 1–2 Jarvis, B. (2006). MediaLab (Version 2004) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corp. Johnson, 1989, Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290, 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290 Mackie, 1986, Social identification effects in group polarization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720, 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720 Mackie, 1992, Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145, 10.1177/0146167292182005 Mackie, 2000, The impact of group membership on persuasion: Revisiting who says what to whom with what effect ?, 135 Mackie, 1990, Processing of persuasive in-group messages, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812 McGarty, 1994, The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion, Small Group Research, 25, 267, 10.1177/1046496494252007 Petty, 1986, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, 124, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 Petty, 1981, Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847, 10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847 Pickett, 2004, Getting a clue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095, 10.1177/0146167203262085 Ray, 2008, Changing categorization of self can change emotions about outgroups, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1210, 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.014 Shih, 1999, Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance, Psychological Science, 10, 80, 10.1111/1467-9280.00111 Turner, 1987 Van Knippenberg, 1994, In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing, British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01026.x Van Knippenberg, 1992, Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms, European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 141, 10.1002/ejsp.2420220204