Identification of ocular refraction based on deep learning algorithm as a novel retinoscopy method

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 21 Số 1 - Trang 1-13 - 2022
Zou, Haohan1,2, Shi, Shenda3,4, Yang, Xiaoyan2,5, Ma, Jiaonan2, Fan, Qian2, Chen, Xuan1,2, Wang, Yibing1,2, Zhang, Mingdong1,2, Song, Jiaxin1,2, Jiang, Yanglin2,5, Li, Lihua5, He, Xin4, Jhanji, Vishal6, Wang, Shengjin4,7, Song, Meina3,4, Wang, Yan1,2,8
1Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
2Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
3School of Computer Science, School of National Pilot Software Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
4HuaHui Jian AI Tech Ltd., Tianjin, China
5Tianjin Eye Hospital Optometric Center, Tianjin, China
6UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
7Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
8Nankai University Eye Institute, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

Tóm tắt

The evaluation of refraction is indispensable in ophthalmic clinics, generally requiring a refractor or retinoscopy under cycloplegia. Retinal fundus photographs (RFPs) supply a wealth of information related to the human eye and might provide a promising approach that is more convenient and objective. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a fusion model-based deep learning system (FMDLS) to identify ocular refraction via RFPs and compare with the cycloplegic refraction. In this population-based comparative study, we retrospectively collected 11,973 RFPs from May 1, 2020 to November 20, 2021. The performance of the regression models for sphere and cylinder was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and F1-score were used to evaluate the classification model of the cylinder axis. Overall, 7873 RFPs were retained for analysis. For sphere and cylinder, the MAE values between the FMDLS and cycloplegic refraction were 0.50 D and 0.31 D, representing an increase of 29.41% and 26.67%, respectively, when compared with the single models. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.949 and 0.807, respectively. For axis analysis, the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve value of the classification model were 0.89, 0.941, 0.882, and 0.814, respectively, and the F1-score was 0.88. The FMDLS successfully identified the ocular refraction in sphere, cylinder, and axis, and showed good agreement with the cycloplegic refraction. The RFPs can provide not only comprehensive fundus information but also the refractive state of the eye, highlighting their potential clinical value.

Tài liệu tham khảo