ISSR Marker Based Population Genetic Study ofMelocanna baccifera(Roxb.) Kurz: A Commercially Important Bamboo of Manipur, North-East India

Scientifica - Tập 2017 - Trang 1-9 - 2017
Heikrujam Nilkanta1, Thoungamba Amom1, Leimapokpam Tikendra1, Hamidur Rahaman1, Potshangbam Nongdam1
1Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal, Manipur, 795003, India

Tóm tắt

Melocanna baccifera(Roxb.) Kurz is an economically important bamboo of North-East India experiencing population depletion in its natural habitats. Genetic variation studies were conducted in 7 populations sampled from 5 districts of Manipur using ISSR molecular markers. The investigation was carried out as a primary step towards developing effective conservation strategies for the protection of bamboo germplasm. ISSR marker analysis showed significant level of genetic variation within the populations as revealed by moderately high average values of Nei’s genetic diversity (H0.1639), Shannon’s diversity index (I0.2563), percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB 59.18), total genetic variation (Ht0.1961), and genetic diversity within population (Hs0.1639). The study also divulged a high genetic variation at species level with Shannon’s diversity index (I), Nei’s genetic diversity (H), and percentage of polymorphic band (PPB%) recorded at 0.3218, 0.1939, and 88.37, respectively. Genetic differentiation among the populations (Gst) was merely 19.42% leaving 80.58% of genetic variation exhibited within the populations. The low genetic diversity between populations was consistent with AMOVA. The low genetic differentiation among populations coupled with existence of significantly high genetic diversity at species level indicated the urgent necessity of preserving and protecting all the existing natural bamboo populations in the region.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1990

10.1016/s0065-2296(08)00005-0

10.1155/2014/679073

2006, Diversity of bamboo species in North-east India, 312

2009, Indian Forester, 6, 817

2010

10.3390/ijms140714860

10.4238/2014.march.6.3

10.1007/s11033-015-3867-9

10.1007/s13205-014-0201-5

10.1098/rstb.1996.0112

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03399.x

10.1139/g05-101

10.1111/j.1601-5223.2011.02208.x

10.1111/efp.12019

2014, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 12, 541

2015, Comptes Rendus Biologies, 11, 723

10.1016/j.bse.2015.11.001

1986

2000, Scientia Silvae Sinica, 3, 57

10.1007/s10722-011-9732-3

10.1007/bf00225152

1997, Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 38, 145

10.1007/pl00013936

10.1139/G05-022

10.1093/aob/mcl143

10.1139/G07-101

10.3390/ijms13044446

10.1134/S1022795414030132

10.1007/s001220050456

10.1007/s10722-009-9450-2

10.1007/s001220051440

10.1007/bf02772892

10.1038/hdy.2008.61

1987, Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11

1999

1978, Genetics, 89, 583, 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583

1997

10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460

10.1093/molbev/msr121

2000, Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945

10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x

10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

10.1086/282771

10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01378.x

2009, Current Science, 96, 1165

10.1006/anbo.2001.1435

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x

10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.08.003

10.3732/ajb.0800368

10.3390/ijms13044396

10.1007/bf00120641

1991

1987, Gene flow and distribution of genetic variation in plant populations, 53

10.1007/bf02805258

10.1007/s10528-005-5215-6

10.1360/biodiv.060053